Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Ordnungen des Politischen pp 103–124Cite as

Die postfundamentalistische Diskursanalyse und die Engpässe kritischer Praxis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Staat – Souveränität – Nation ((SSN))

Zusammenfassung

Die aktuelle diskursive Wende in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften wirftgrundlegende Fragen in Bezug auf kritische Praxis und Analyse auf. Diskurstheorien, die auf den Arbeiten von Michel Foucault und Ernesto Laclau fußen, haben nicht nur argumentiert, dass die Wahrnehmung der Welt durch soziale Subjekte deren diskursspezifische epistemische Horizonte widerspiegelt, sondern es wurde auch bestritten, dass Diskurse einen außerdiskursiven Ort der Begründung und Rechtfertigung besitzen könnten (vgl. Foucault 1991; Laclau & Mouffe 1990). Wenn jede sinnvolle Praxis diskursiv hervorgebracht bzw. rationalisiert wurde, dann bedeutet dies, dass nicht nur soziale, politische, religiöse und andere kulturelle Praktiken von den sie rationalisierenden und definierenden Diskursen bedingt sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Åkerstrøm Andersen, Niels, 2003: Discursive Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, Robert J. 1981: Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory. In: British Journal of Sociology 32, Heft 3, S. 330–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Tom 2014: Critique is a Thing of This World: Towards an Analogy of Critique. In: History of the Human Sciences 27, H.1, S. 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, 2010: Soziologie und Sozialkritik. Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, Geoff, 2009: The Charmed Circle of Ideology: A Critique of Laclau and Mouffe, Butler and Žižek. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre, 1992: The Paris Workshop. In: Bourdieu, Pierre & Wacquant, Loic (Hg.): An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, S. 217–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman, Thomas, 2003: The Failure of the Radical Democratic Imaginary: Žižek Versus Laclau and Mouffe on Vestigal Utopia. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 29, H.2, S. 183–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, 2002: What is Critique? An Essay on Foucault’s Virtue. In: Ingram, David (Hg.): The Political Blackwell Readings in Continental Philosophy, New Jersey, S. 212–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, 2009: Critique, Dissent, Disciplinarity. In: Critical Inquiry 35, H.3, S. 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cederström, Carl & Spicer, Andre, 2014: Discourse of the Real Kind: A post-foundational Approach to Organizational Discourse Analysis. In: Organization 21, H.2, S. 178–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celikates, Robin, 2006: From Critical Theory to a Social Theory of Critique: On the Critique of Ideology after the Pragmatic Turn. In: Constellations 13, H.1, S. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Maeve, 2006: Resurrecting the Rationality of Ideology Critique: Reflections on Laclau and Ideology Critique. In: Constellations 13, H.1, S. 4–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon, 1999: Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon, 2004: Is There a Normative Deficit in the Theory of Discourse? In: Critchley, Simon & Marchart, Oliver (Hg.): Laclau: A Critical Reader. London and New York, S. 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, Amarpal K., (1996): Can the Subaltern Vote? Radical Democracy, Discourses of Representation and Rights, and Questions of Race. In: Trend, David (Hg.): Radical Democracy: Identity, Citizenship, and the State, New York, S. 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirović, Alex, 2007: Hegemonie und die diskursive Konstruktion der Gesellschaft. In: Nonhoff, Martin (Hg.): Diskurs, radikale Demokratie und Hegemonie. Zum politischen Denken von Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouffe, Bielefeld, S. 55–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diken, Bülent, 2008: Nihilism. London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, Pierpaolo, 2011: Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, 1991: Politics and the Study of Discourse. In: Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin & Miller, Peter (Hg.): The Foucault Effect, Chicago, S. 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, 1997: What is Critique? In: Lotringer, Sylvere & Hochroth, Lysa (Hg.): The Politics of Truth, New York, S. 823–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel, 2000[1982]: Space, Knowledge, and Power. In: Faubion, James D. (Hg.): Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, Volume 3, London, S. 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 1975: Truth and Method. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gengnagel, Vincent & Hirschfeld, Alex, 2015: Die Herrschaft und ‚das Politische‘: Machtanalyse zwischen Konsens und Konflikt. In: Hofmann, Willy & Martinsen, Renate (Hg.): Die andere Seite der Politik: Theorien kultureller Konstruktion des Politischen. Wiesbaden, S. 85-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, Jason, 2001: The Grip of Ideology: a Lacanian Approach to the Theory of Ideology. In: Journal of Political Ideologies 6, H.2, S. 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, Jason & Howarth, David R., 2007: Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, Jason & Howarth, David R., 2008: Critical Explanation in Social Science: A Logics Approach. In: Swiss Journal of Sociology 54, H.1, S. 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynos, Jason, Howarth, David R., Norval, Aletta & Speed, Ewan, 2009: Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods. Review Paper NCRM/014. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin, 2008[1988]: Ontology: The Hermeneutics of Facticity. Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel, 1999: Pathologies of the Social: The Past and Present of Social Theory. In: Rasmussen, David (Hg.): The Handbook of Critical Theory, Oxford, S. 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel, 2000: The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique of Society: The Dialectic of Enlightenment in Light of Current Debates in Social Criticism. In: Constellations 7, H.1, S. 116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, Axel, 2011: Das Recht der Freiheit. Grundriss einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, David R., 2006: The Method of Articulation. In: van den Brink, Margo & Metze, Tamara (Hg.): Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in Social Science, Utrecht, S. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, David R., 2008: Ethos, Agonism and Populism: William Connolly and the Case for Radical Democracy. In: British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10, S. 171–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, Simon, 1998: Adorno: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, Jonathan, 2001: Derrida’s Spectres of Ideology. In: Journal of Political Ideologies 6, H.1, S. 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen, Antti, 2002: Reason, Recognition, and Internal Critique. In: Inquiry. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 45, H.4, S. 479–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Reiner, 2011: Wissenssoziologische Diskursanalyse: Grundlegung eines Forschungsprogramms. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Reiner, 2012: Doing Discourse Analysis: An Introduction for Social Scientists. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Andrew M., 1993: Poststructuralism and the Epistemological Basis of Anarchism. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23, H.3, S. 327–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompridis, Nikolas, 1994: On World Disclosure: Heidegger, Habermas and Dewey. In: Thesis Eleven 37, H.1, S. 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompridis, Nikolas, 2000: Reorienting Critique: From Ironist Theory to Transformative Practice. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 26, H.4, S. 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Colin, 2010: Historical Critique or Transcendental Critique in Foucault: Two Kantian Lineages. In: Foucault Studies 8, S. 100–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, 1996: Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Discourse. In: Mouffe, Chantal (Hg.): Deconstruction and Pragmatism: Simon Critchley, Jacques Derrida, Ernesto Laclau and Richard Rorty, London and New York, S. 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, 1997: The Death and Resurrection of the Theory of Ideology. In: MLN 112, H.3, S. 297–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, 2000: Identity and Discourse: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In: Butler, Judith, Laclau, Ernesto & Žižek, Slavoj (Hg.): Contingency, Discourse, Universality. Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, London and New York, S. 44–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto, 2004: Glimpsing the Future. In: Critchley, Simon & Marchart, Oliver (Hg.): Laclau: A Critical Reader. New York, S. 279–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal, 1990: Post-Marxism without Apologies. In: Laclau, Ernesto (Hg.): New Reflections of the Revolution of Our Time, London, S. 97–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal, 2001[1985]: Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre, 1968: Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69, S. 149–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre, 1999: Lecture 8: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Motterlini, Matteo (Hg.): For and Against Method, Chicago, S. 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, 2004: Why has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. In: Critical Inquiry 30, H.2, S. 225–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, Will, 2013: Restoring Society to Post-Structuralist Politics: Mouffe, Gramsci and Radical Democracy. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 39, H.3, S. 299–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort, Claude, 1988: Democracy and Political Theory. Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, Oliver, 2007: Post-Foundational Political Thought. Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchart, Oliver, 2011: Democracy and Minimal Politics: The Political Difference and its Consequences. In: The South Atlantic Quarterly 110, H.4, S. 965–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, Tomas, 2013a: Culture of Enterprise in Neoliberalism: The Specters of Entrepreneurship. London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, Tomas, 2013b: Whither Governmentality Research? A Case Study of the Governmentalization of the Entrepreneur in the French Epistemological Tradition. In: Historical Social Research 38, H.4, S. 293–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, Tomas, 2015a: Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: From Political Difference to Empirical Research. Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, Tomas, 2015b: Post-Foundational Discourse Analysis: A Suggestion for a Research Programme. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 16, H.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marttila, Tomas, 2015c: Die kritische Epistemologie der poststrukturalistischen Hegemonietheorie. In: Langer, Antje, Nonhoff, Martin & Reisigl, Martin (Hg.): Diskursanalyse und Kritik. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miklitsch, Robert, 1995: The Rhetoric of Post-Marxism: Discourse and Institutionality in Laclau and Mouffe, Resnick and Wolff. In: Social Text 45, H.1, S. 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal, 1992: Citizenship and the Political Identity. In: October 61, S. 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal, 2000a: The Democratic Paradox. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal, 2000b: Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism. In: Reihe Politikwissenschaft, No. 72. Wien: Institute for Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal, 2002: Politics and Passions: The Stakes of Democracy. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal, 2005a: On the Political. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, Chantal, 2005b[1993]: The Return of the Political. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich W., 1954: Werke in drei Bänden. Band II. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, Dick, 2003: Unhastening Science: Autonomy and Reflexivity in the Social Theory of Knowledge. Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saar, Martin, 2007: Genealogie als Kritik. Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward W., 1983: The World, the Text and the Critic. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparke, Matthew, 2005: In the Space of Theory: Postfoundational Geographies of the Nation State. Minneapolis and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrakakis, Yannis, 2007: The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics. Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, Jacob, 1999: New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Žižek. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tønder, Lars & Thomassen, Lasse, 2005: Introduction: Rethinking Radical Democracy Between Abundance and Lack. In: Tønder, Lars & Thomassen, Lasse (Hg.): Radical Democracy: Politics between Abundance and Lack, Manchester, S. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vobruba, Georg, 2001: Gesellschaftsinterne Kritik: Eine Positionsbestimmung. In: Dialektik: Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie 2, S. 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin, Richard, 1992: The Terms of Cultural Criticism: The Frankfurt School, Existentialism, Poststructuralism. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj, 1991: For They Do Not Know What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj, 1993: Tarrying with the Negative. Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. München, Deutschland

    Tomas Marttila

  2. Bamberg, Deutschland

    Vincent Gengnagel

Authors
  1. Tomas Marttila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vincent Gengnagel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomas Marttila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Universität Wien , Wien, Austria

    Oliver Marchart

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marttila, T., Gengnagel, V. (2017). Die postfundamentalistische Diskursanalyse und die Engpässe kritischer Praxis. In: Marchart, O. (eds) Ordnungen des Politischen. Staat – Souveränität – Nation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17259-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17259-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17258-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17259-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation