Skip to main content

New Approaches to Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) is charged under a variety of statutes, including the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act, with evaluating the potential health risks of chemicals present in the human environment. In considering the implementation of these laws, it is important to note that the situations to be evaluated range from workers occupationally exposed during the manufacture of industrial chemicals or during the preparation and application of pesticides, to widespread, but low level, exposure of large segments of the general population through the food, water or air. Such situations are in direct contrast to the health risks associated with pharmaceutical agents, where the exposure is direct and controlled and the benefits accrue to the exposed individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen BC, Van Landingham C, Howe R, Kavlock RJ, Kimmel CA, Faustman EF (1992) Dose-response modeling for developmental toxicity. The Toxicologist 12(1): 300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes D, Dourson M (1988) Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessment. Regulatory Toxicol Pharmacol 8: 471–486.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crump KS (1984) A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fund Appl Toxicol 4: 854–871.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daston GP, Rogers JM, Versteg DJ, Sabourin TD, Baines D, Marsh SS (1991) Interspecies comparisons of A/D ratios are not constant across species. Fund Appl Toxicol 17: (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA (1966) Guidelines for reproduction and teratology studies of drugs. Bureau of Drugs, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaylor DW (1989) Quantitative risk analysis for quantal reproductive outcomes. Environ Hlth Perspect 79: 243–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel GL, Kimmel CA, Francis EZ, eds (1988) Evaluation of Maternal and Developmental Toxicity. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagen 7: 203–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel CA, Wellington DG, Farland W, Ross P, Manson JM, Chernoff N, Young JF, Selevan SG, Kaplan N, Chen C, Chitlik LD, Siegel-Scott C, Valaoras G, Wells S (1989) Overview of a Workshop on Quantitative Models for Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment. Environ Hlth Perspect 79: 209–215.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel CA (1990) Quantitative approaches to human risk assessment for non-cancer health effects. Neurotoxicol 11: 189–198.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kodell RL, Howe RB, Chen JJ, Gaylor DW (1991) Mathematical modelling of reproductive and developmental toxicity effects for quantitative risk assessment. Risk Analysis 11: in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupper LL, Portier C, Hogan MD, Yamamoto E (1986) The impact of litter effects on dose-response modelling in teratology. Biometrics 42: 85–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1983) Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: managing the process. Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health. Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council. Washington D.C., National Academy Press, pp 17-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai K, van Ryzin J (1985) A dose-response model for teratological experiments involving quantal response. Biometrics 41: 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setzer RW, Rogers JM (1992) Assessing developmental hazard: The reliability of the A/D ratio. Teratology, in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MK, Randall JL, Read EJ, Stober JA (1989) Teratogenic activity of trichloroacetic acid in the rat. Teratology 40: 445–451.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1982) Pesticide Assessment Guidelines, Subdivision F. Hazard evaluation: human and domestic animals. EPA-540/9-82-025.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1985) Toxic Substances Control Act Test Guidelines; Final rules. Fed Reg 50: 39426-39428 and 39433-39434.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1986) Guidelines for the Health Assessment of Suspect Developmental Toxicants. Fed Reg 51: 34028-34040.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1989) Proposed Amendments to the Guidelines for the Health Assessment of Suspect Developmental Toxicants; Request for Comments; Notice. Fed Reg 54: 9386–9403.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1991) Guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment; Notice. Fed Reg 56: 63798–63826.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kavlock, R.J., Kimmel, C.A. (1992). New Approaches to Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In: Neubert, D., Kavlock, R.J., Merker, HJ., Klein, J. (eds) Risk Assessment of Prenatally-Induced Adverse Health Effects. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77753-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77753-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-77755-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77753-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics