Skip to main content

The Evolution and Coordination of U.S. Commodity and Resource Policies

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Agricultural Management and Economics ((AGRICULT.MANAG.))

Abstract

There is a growing popular and professional awareness of the incoherence of government policy. It has been argued in numerous forums that the Federal government’s contradictory policies hobble U.S. industry. In the popular media, many articles have described these incoherent policies (e.g., Business Week 1980). A frequently cited example is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) restricting the use of pesticides while the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USD A) promotes pesticides for agricultural and forestry uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alston JM, Edwards WE, Freebairn JW (1988) Market distortions and benefits from research. Am J Agric Econ 70:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batie SS (1983) Soil erosion: crisis in America’s croplands? The Conservation Foundation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie SS, Diebel PL (1989) Managing Agricultural contamination of ground water: state strategies. Dep Agric Econ, Virginia Polytech Inst and State Univ, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie S, Shabman L, Kramer R (1985) US agriculture and natural resource policy. In: Price K (ed) The dilemmas of choice. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, pp 127–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol WJ (1972) On taxation and the control of externalities. Am Econ Rev 62:307–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker G (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for influence. Q J Econ 48:371–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati J (1982) Directly unproductive, profit-seeking activities. J Polit Econ 70:998–1002

    Google Scholar 

  • Bills NL, Dideriksen RI (1980) Land and water base: historical overview and current inventory. In: Farm structure. Committee print, 96th Congr, Second Session, Senate Committee Agric Nutr Forestry, Washington DC, pp 101–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Bills, NL, Heimlich RE (1984) Assessing erosion on US cropland: land management and physical features. AER-513. US Dep Agric, Econ Res Serv

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1988) Cash versus kind, self-selection, and efficient transfers. Am Econ Rev 78:691–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso CJ (1987) Pesticides and politics: the life cycle of a public issue. Univ Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding K (1962) The feather river anthology or ‘holy water’ (unpubl)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1962) The calculus of consent. Univ Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Week (1980) The incoherence of government policy, pp 66–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Fawcett, Greenwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman JS, Moore JC (1978) The new welfare economics 1939–1974. Int Econ Rev 19:547–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ III:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane WW (1979) The development of American agriculture: a historical analysis. Univ Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson P (1984) New perspectives on soil conservation policy. J Soil Water Conserv 39:222–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosson P, Brubaker S (1982) Resources and environmental effects of US agriculture. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, Chap 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Reports of the President (1986, 1987) Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Englebert EA, Scheuring AF (eds) (1982) Competition for California water: alternative resolutions. Univ California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher AC, Peterson FM (1976) The environment in economics. J Econ Lit 14:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster WE, Rausser GC (1988) Farmer behavior under risk of failure. Dep Agric Resour Econ, Working Pap 488, Univ California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster WE, Rausser GC (1989) A political-economic rationale for coupled welfare transfer policies. Dep Agric Resour Econ, Working Pap 498, Univ California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner BL (1983) Efficient redistribution through commodity markets. Am J Agric Econ 65:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner BL (1987) Causes of US farm commodity programs. J Polit Econ 95:290–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman WM (1955) The intransitivity of certain criteria used in welfare economics. Oxford Econ Pap 7:25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray R (1988) Piecemeal policy proliferation in political economic markets. Dep Agric Resour Econ, Univ California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, JR (1940) The valuation of social income. Economica 7:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes BH (1979) History of Federal water resources programs and policies, 1961–70. Misc Pub No 1379. US Dep Agric, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Just RE, Zilberman D (1987) In defense offence to fence. Working Pap, Dep Agric Resour Econ, Univ California, Berkeley (unpubl)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor N (1939) Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparison of utility. Econ J 49:549–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis LN (1988) Setting research priorities. Calif Agric 42:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D (1986) The welfare economics of price supports in US agriculture. Am Econ Rev 76:1135–1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey RG, Lancaster K (1956–57) The general theory of second best. Rev Econ Stud 24:11–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi TJ (1965) How farmers get what they want. In: Lowi TJ (ed) Legislative politics USA. Little, Brown Inc, New York, pp 132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre AA (1987) Why pesticides received extensive use in America: a political economy of agricultural pest management to 1970. Nat Resour J 27:533–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RC (1979) National environmental lobbies and the apparent illogic of collective action. In: Russell CS (ed) Collective decision making: applications from public choice theory. Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore, pp 87–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore CV (1970) The Reclamation Reform Act-PEST or Pesticide? West J Agric Econ 8:245–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng Y-K (1984) Quasi-Pareto social improvements. Am Econ Rev 74:1033–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavelis G A (1985) Natural resource capital formation in American agriculture: Irrigation, drainage, and conservation, 1855–1980. US Dep Agric, Econ Res Serv, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman S (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. J Law Econ 19:211–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins J (1982) Insects, experts, and the insecticide crisis. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky AM (1972) Probabilistic compensation criteria. Q J Econ 86:407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn ML (1980) An historical survey of drought planning. In: Rosenberg NJ (ed) Drought in the Great Plains. Water Resour Publ, Littleton, pp 135–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen WD (1965) The civil war: a catalyst of agricultural revolution. Agric History 39:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen WD (1981) History of soil conservation policy, institutions, and incentives. In: Halcrow HG, Heady EO, Cotner ML (eds) Soil conservation policies, institutions, and incentives. Soil Conserv Soc Am, Ankeny, pp 3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC (1974) Technological change, production, and investment in natural resource industries. Am Econ Rev 64:1049–1059

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC (1982) Political economic markets: PERTs and PESTs in food and agriculture. Am J Agric Econ 64:821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, de Gorter H (1989) Endogenizing policy in models of agricultural markets. In: Maunder A, Valdes A (eds) Agriculture and governments in an interdependent world. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, pp 259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, Foster WE (1989) A coherent policy for US agriculture. In: Horowich G, Lynch GJ (eds) Food, policy, and politics: A perspective on agriculture and development. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 191–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, Foster WE (1990) Political preference functions and the market for public policy reform. Am J Agric Econ, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, Howitt R (1975) Stochastic control of environmental externalities. Ann Econ Social Measurement 4:227–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser GC, Lapan H (1979) Natural resources, goods, bads, and alternative institutional frameworks. Resour Energy 2:271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer K, Hinkle MK (1989) The evolution of pesticide policy; Environmental interests and agriculture. In: Kramer CS (ed) Political economy of US agriculture: Challenges for the 1990s. Resources for the Future, Washington DC, pp 147–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer K, Kramer R (1989) Resource and agricultural policy. Econ Res Serv Duke Univ (in prep)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan VW (1982) Agricultural research policy. Univ Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky T (1941) A note on welfare propositions in economics. Rev Econ Stud 6:77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg TH (1974) On taxation and the control of externalities: Comment. Am Econ Rev 64:462–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten L (1979) Foundations of farm policy. Univ Nebraska Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweeten L (1989) Adjustments in agriculture and its infrastructure in the 1990’s. In: Positioning agriculture for the 1990’s: a decade of change. Nat Planning Comm, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress, House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations (1980) Hearings… Agriculture, rural development, and related agencies’ appropriations for 1981 (Part 3), 96th Congr, 2nd edn. Washington DC, pp 571–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb DK (1972) Externalities and welfare. Columbia Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster D (1985) Rivers of empire: water, aridity and the growth of the American West. Pantheon, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rausser, G.C., Foster, W.E. (1991). The Evolution and Coordination of U.S. Commodity and Resource Policies. In: Just, R.E., Bockstael, N. (eds) Commodity and Resource Policies in Agricultural Systems. Agricultural Management and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75499-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75499-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75501-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75499-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics