Skip to main content

On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws

  • Chapter
Upwind and High-Resolution Schemes

Abstract

This paper reviews some of the recent developments in upstream difference schemes through a unified representation, in order to enable comparison between the various schemes. Special attention is given to the Godunov-type schemes that result from using an approximate solution of the Riemann problem. For schemes based on flux splitting, the approximate Riemann solution can be interpreted as a solution of the collisionless Boltzmann equation.

Received by the editors March 29, 1982, and in revised form May 5, 1982. This research was sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under contract NAS1-15810 while the first and third authors were in residence at ICASE, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia.

The work of this author was supported in part by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under contract NCA2-OR525-001 at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, and by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-76ER03077.

The work of this author was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC02-76ER03077.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Courant, E. Isaacson and M. ReesOn the solution of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations.Comm. Pure Appi. Math., 5 (1952), pp. 243–255.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. G. Crandall and A. Majda, Monotone difference approximations for scalar conservation laws,Math. Comp., 34 (1980), pp. 1–21.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Glimm, Solutions in the large for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of equations, Comm. Pure Appl.Math. 18 (1965), pp. 697–715.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. S. K. Godunov A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of equations of fluid dynamics. Math. Sbornik, 47 (1959), pp. 271–306. (In Russian.)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Harten, High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws Report DOE/ER/03077-.67,New York Univ., March 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Harten, J. M. Hyman and P. D. Lax, On finite-difference approximations and entropy conditions for shocks, Comm. Pure Appi. Math., 29 (1976), pp. 297–322.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Harten and P. D. Lax A random choice finite-difference scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 18 (1981), pp. 289–315.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Harten, On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy, ICASE Report 81–34,ICASE, Hampton, VA, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Harten and J. M. Hyman, A self-adjusting grid for the computation of weak solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws, Report LA9105, Center for Nonlinear Studies, Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. C. Huang Pseudo-unsteady difference schemes for discontinuous solutions of steady-state one-dimensional fluid dynamics problems, J. Comp. Phys., 42 (1981), pp. 195–211.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kaniel and J. Falcovitz, Transport approach for compressible flow, Proc. 4th International IRIA Symposium on Computing Methods in Science and Engineering, Versailles, Dec. 1979, R. Glowinski and P. L. Lions, eds., North Holland, Amsterdam, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. D. Lax Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves,CBMS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 11, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. van Leer Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. III, J. Comp. Phys., 23 (1977) pp. 263–275.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. B. van Leer, Upwind differencing for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, in Numerical Methods for Engineering, Vol. 1, Dunod, Paris, 1980, pp. 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. van Leer, Flux-vector splitting for the Euler equations presented at the 8th Internat. Conference on Numerical Methods for Engineering, Aachen, June, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Osher, Numerical solution of singular perturbation problems and hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, in Mathematics Studies, 47, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981, pp. 179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. J. Pullin, Direct simulation methods for compressible inviscid ideal gas flow, J. Comp. Phys., 34 (1980), pp. 231–244.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. R. D. Rietz One-dimensional compressible gas dynamics calculations using the Boltzmann equation, J.Comp. Phys., 42 (1981), pp. 108–123.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. L. Roe, The use of the Riemann problem in finite-difference schemes in Proc. 7th International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Stanford/NASA Ames, June 1980, Lecture Notes in Physics, 141, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981, pp. 354–359.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B van Leer, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comp. Phys., 43 (1981), pp. 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. H. Sanders and K. H. Prendergast On the origin of the 3-kiloparsec arm Ap. J., 188 (1974), pp. 489–500.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. L. Steger and R. F. Warming Flux-vector splitting of the inviscid gas dynamic equations with applications to finite-difference methods, J. Comp. Phys., 40 (1981), pp. 263–293.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. J. L. Steger A preliminary study of relaxation methods for the inviscid conservative gas dynamics equations using flux-vector splitting Report 80-4, Flow Simulations, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, August 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harten, A., Lax, P.D., van Leer, B. (1997). On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. In: Hussaini, M.Y., van Leer, B., Van Rosendale, J. (eds) Upwind and High-Resolution Schemes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64452-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60543-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics