Abstract
Bayesian BDI agents employ bayesian networks to represent uncertain knowledge within an agent’s beliefs. Although such models allow a richer belief representation, current models of bayesian BDI agents employ a rather limited strategy for desire selection, namely one based on threshold values on belief probability. Consequently, such an approach precludes an agent from selecting desires conditioned on beliefs with probabilities below a certain threshold, even if those desires could be achieved if they had been selected. To address this limitation, we develop three alternative approaches to desire selection under uncertainty. We show how these approaches allow an agent to sometimes select desires whose belief conditions have very low probabilities and discuss experimental scenarios.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Wooldridge, M.: Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak Using Jason. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2007)
Bratman, M., Israel, D.J., Pollack, M.E.: Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence 4, 349–355 (1988)
Carrera, Á., Iglesias, C.A.: B2DI A Bayesian BDI Agent Model with Causal Belief Updating based on MSBN. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2012), pp. 343–346. SciTePress (2012)
Fagundes, M.S., Vicari, R.M., Coelho, H.: Deliberation process in a BDI model with bayesian networks. In: Ghose, A., Governatori, G., Sadananda, R. (eds.) PRIMA 2007. LNCS, vol. 5044, pp. 207–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Jennings, N.R.: On agent-based software engineering. Artificial Intelligence 117, 277–296 (2000)
Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn. Springer (2007)
Kieling, G., Vicari, R.M.: Insertion of probabilistic knowledge into BDI agents construction modeled in Bayesian Networks. In: International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS 2011), vol. 1, pp. 115–122. Conference Publishing Services (CPS), Seoul, California (2011)
Móra, M.C., Lopes, J.G., Viccari, R.M., Coelho, H.: BDI models and systems: Reducing the gap. In: Papadimitriou, C., Singh, M.P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) ATAL 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1555, pp. 11–27. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan-Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)
Decision Systems Laboratory - University of Pittsburgh: Genie & smile (May 2012), http://genie.sis.pitt.edu/
Rao, A.S.: AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language. In: Van de Velde, W., Perram, J.W. (eds.) MAAMAW 1996. LNCS, vol. 1038, pp. 42–55. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Russel, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luz, B., Meneguzzi, F., Vicari, R. (2013). Alternatives to Threshold-Based Desire Selection in Bayesian BDI Agents. In: Cossentino, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Winikoff, M. (eds) Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. EMAS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45342-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45343-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)