Skip to main content

Planning Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic: Correspondence and Complexity

  • Conference paper
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8196))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1105 Accesses

Abstract

A growing community investigates planning using dynamic epistemic logic. Another framework based on similar ideas is knowledge-based programs as plans. Here we show how actions correspond in the two frameworks. We finally discuss fragments of DEL planning obtained by the restriction of event models. Fragments are separated by virtue of their computational complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, M.B., Bolander, T., Jensen, M.H.: Conditional epistemic planning. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds.) JELIA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7519, pp. 94–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolander, T., Andersen, M.B.: Epistemic planning for single and multi-agent systems. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 21(1), 9–34 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Ditmarsch, H., Kooi, B.: Semantic results for ontic and epistemic change. In: Bonanno, G., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 7), pp. 87–117. Texts in Logic and Games, Amsterdam University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lang, J., Zanuttini, B.: Knowledge-based programs as plans: Succinctness and the complexity of plan existence. In: Proc. TARK 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rintanen, J.: Complexity of planning with partial observability. In: Zilberstein, S., Koehler, J., Koenig, S. (eds.) ICAPS, pp. 345–354. AAAI (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, Q., Wen, X., Liu, Y.: Multi-agent epistemic explanatory diagnosis via reasoning about actions. In: To appear in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jensen, M.H. (2013). Planning Using Dynamic Epistemic Logic: Correspondence and Complexity. In: Grossi, D., Roy, O., Huang, H. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40947-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40948-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics