Skip to main content

What Makes Learning Fun? Exploring the Influence of Choice and Difficulty on Mind Wandering and Engagement during Learning

  • Conference paper
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Maintaining learner engagement is critical for all types of learning technologies. This study investigated how choice over a learning topic and the difficulty of the materials influenced mind wandering, engagement, and learning during a computerized learning task. 59 participants were randomly assigned to a text difficulty and choice condition (i.e., self-selected or experimenter-selected topic) and measures of mind wandering and engagement were collected during learning. Participants who studied the difficult version of the texts reported significantly higher rates of mind wandering (d = .41) and lower arousal both during (d = .52) and after the learning session (d = .48). Mind wandering and arousal were not affected by choice. However, participants who were assigned to study the topic they selected reported significantly more positive valence during (d = .57) but not after learning. These participants also scored substantially higher on a subsequent knowledge test (d = 1.27). These results suggest that choice and text difficulty differentially impact mind wandering, engagement, and learning and provide important considerations for the design of ITSs and serious games with a reading component.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: The half-life of cognitive-affective states during complex learning. Cognition & Emotion 25, 1299–1308 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L., Stupnisky, R., Perry, R.: Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology 102, 531 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Drummond, J., Litman, D.: In the zone: Towards detecting student zoning out using supervised machine learning. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 306–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: When does disengagement correlate with learning in spoken dialog computer tutoring? In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 81–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann, S., Robinson, A.: Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal 35, 243–258 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baker, R., D’Mello, S., Rodrigo, M., Graesser, A.: Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Larson, R., Richards, M.: Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education 99, 418–443 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., Paris, A.: School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74, 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arroyo, I., Ferguson, K., Johns, J., Dragon, T., Meheranian, H., Fisher, D., et al.: Repairing disengagement with non-invasive interventions. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 158, p. 195 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D’Mello, S., Chipman, P., Graesser, A.: Posture as a predictor of learner’s affective engagement. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 905–910 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joseph, E.: Engagement tracing: Using response times to model student disengagement. In: Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology, vol. 125, p. 88 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smallwood, J., Schooler, J.: The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin 132, 946 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smallwood, J., Fishman, D., Schooler, J.: Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 230–236 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graesser, A.: Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 101, 371–395 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McNamara, D., Kintsch, W.: Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes 22, 247–288 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., McNamara, D.: Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction 19, 228–242 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zwaan, R., Radvansky, G.: Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123, 162 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schooler, J., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T., Reichle, E., Sayette, M.: Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, 319–326 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., Schooler, J.: The lights are on but no one’s home: Meta-awareness and the decoupling of attention when the mind wanders. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 527–533 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng, S., D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pekrun, R.: The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review 18, 315–341 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Deci, E., Ryan, R.: Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum, New York (1985)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Hidi, S., Renninger, K.: The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist 41, 111–127 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cordova, D., Lepper, M.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 715 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Calvert, S., Strong, B., Gallagher, L.: Control as an engagement feature for young children’s attention to and learning of computer content. The American Behavioral Scientist 48, 578 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., Berndorff, D.: Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 545 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Millis, K., Forsyth, C., Butler, H., Wallace, P., Graesser, A., Halpern, D.: Operation ARIES!: A serious game for teaching scientific inquiry. In: Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 169–195. Springer, London (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Smilek, D., Carriere, J., Cheyne, J.: Out of mind, out of sight Eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science 21, 786–789 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S.: Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 3–5 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mason, W., Suri, S.: Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, 1–23 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Graesser, A., McNamara, D., Kulikowich, J.: Coh-Metrix providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher 40, 223–234 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., McCarthy, P., Graesser, A.: Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes 47, 292–330 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Graesser, A., Person, N.: Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 31, 104–137 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mills, C., D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Bosch, N., Strain, A., Graesser, A. (2013). What Makes Learning Fun? Exploring the Influence of Choice and Difficulty on Mind Wandering and Engagement during Learning. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics