Skip to main content

A Propagating Update Method of Multi-Represented Vector Map Data Based on Spatial Objective Similarity and Unified Geographic Entity Code

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cartography from Pole to Pole

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((ICA))

Abstract

In recent years the propagating update of multi-represented datasets has become a crucial issue for maintaining geographic data, especially since National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) appeared. The key to propagating update is building the mappings between the datasets. Usually the traditional approaches of building the mappings don’t consider the attributive similarity and often use object IDs to build the mappings which may differ with the variation of data storage. Accordingly, a comprehensive similarity computing method is proposed and unified geographic entity code (UGEC) is put forwards to build the mappings in this chapter. A workflow of propagating update, which mainly consists of data preprocessing, changes detecting, changes extracting, master dataset updating, and target dataset updating, is presented on the basis of objects mappings. An experiment on implementation of this method demonstrates its viability at the end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Bakri M, Fairbairn D (2012) Assessing similarity matching for possible integration of feature classifications of geospatial data from official and informal sources. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26(8):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belussi A, Catania B, Podesta P (2005) Towards topological consistency and similarity of multiresolution geographical maps. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems, pp 220–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch D (1999) GIS data revision-visions and reality: keynote speech in joint ISPRS commission workshop on dynamic and multi-dimensional GIS. NGCC, Bejing

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontiera P, Larson R, Radke J (2008) A comparison of geometric approaches to assessing spatial similarity for GIR. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(3):337–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu ZL, Wu JH (2008) Entity matching in vector spatial data. Vol. XXXVII. Part B4, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Bejing, pp 1467–1472

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrie L, Hellström AK (1999a) A case study of propagating updates between cartographic data sets. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Cartographic Conference of the ICA, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrie L, Hellström AK (1999b) A prototype system for propagating updates between cartographic data sets. Cartogr J 36(2):133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haunert JH, Sester M (2005) Propagating updates between linked datasets of different scales. In: Proceedings of XXII international cartographic conference (ICC 2005), pp 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt A (1999) Spatial similarity and GIS: the grouping of spatial kinds. In: 11th annual colloquium of the spatial information research center (SIRC05), pp 241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt A, Benwell GL (1997) Using spatial similarity for exploratory spatial data analysis: some directions. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on geographic information systems, pp 279–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang HK, Moon JW, Li KJ (2004) Data update across multi-scale databases. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on geoinformatics, pp 749–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieler B, Huang W, Haunert JH, Jiang J (2009) Matching river datasets of different scales. In: Sester M, Bernard L, Paelke V (eds) Advances in GIScience. Springer, Berlin, pp 135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Fonseca F (2006) Tdd: a comprehensive model for qualitative spatial similarity assessment. Spatial Cogn Comput 6(1):31–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Goodchild MF (2010) Automatically and accurately matching objects in geospatial datasets. In: Proceedings of theory, data handling and modelling in geospatial information science, Hong Kong, pp 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Goodchild MF (2011) An optimisation model for linear feature matching in geographical data conflation. Int J Image Data Fusion 2(4):309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Zhou KB, Feng S (2005) A similarity calculation strategy based on the statistic of case feature. J Huazhong Univ Sci Tech (Nat Sci Ed) 33(6):80–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi HB, Li ZL, Chen J (2010) Automated change detection for updating settlements at smaller-scale maps from updated larger-scale maps. J Spatial Sci 55(1):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainsford D, Mackaness W (2002) Template matching in support of generalisation of rural buildings. In: Advances in spatial data handling. In: Proceedings 10th international symposium on spatial data handling, pp 137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Samal A, Seth S, Cueto K (2004) A feature-based approach to conflation of geospatial sources. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 18(5):459–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheeren D, Mustière S, Zucker JD (2009) A data-mining approach for assessing consistency between multiple representations in spatial databases. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23(8):961–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A (1977) Features of similarity. Psychol Rev 84(4):327–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volz S (2006) An iterative approach for matching multiple representations of street data, pp 101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter V, Fritsch D (1999) Matching spatial data sets: a statistical approach. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 5(13):445–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YH, Wei FY (2008) A schema-matching-based approach to propagating updates between heterogeneous spatial databases 714605-1-10

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 201120502020005)” and “the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41271455/D0108)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fu Ren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, Y., Du, Q., Ren, F., Zhao, Z. (2014). A Propagating Update Method of Multi-Represented Vector Map Data Based on Spatial Objective Similarity and Unified Geographic Entity Code. In: Buchroithner, M., Prechtel, N., Burghardt, D. (eds) Cartography from Pole to Pole. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics