Abstract
Classification methods have been widely used during last years in order to predict patterns and trends of interest in data. In present paper, a multiclassifier approach that combines the output of some of the most popular data mining algorithms is shown. The approach is based on voting criteria, by estimating the confidence distributions of each algorithm individually and combining them according to three different methods: confidence voting, weighted voting and majority voting. To illustrate its applicability in a real problem, the drill wear detection in machine-tool sector is addressed. In this study, the accuracy obtained by each isolated classifier is compared with the performance of the multiclassifier when characterizing the patterns of interest involved in the drilling process and predicting the drill wear. Experimental results show that, in general, false positives obtained by the classifiers can be slightly reduced by using the multiclassifier approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Emmanouilidis, C., et al.: Flexible software for condition monitoring, incorporating novelty detection and diagnostics. Computers in Industry 57, 516–527 (2006)
Cassady, C.R., Schneider, K., Yu, P.: Impact of Maintenance Resource Limitations on Manufacturing System Productivity. In: Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research 2002 Conference (2002)
Muller, A., et al.: Formalisation of a new prognosis model for supporting proactive maintenance implementation on industrial system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93, 234–253 (2008)
van Erp, M., Vuurpijl, L., Schomaker, L.: An overview and comparison of voting methods for pattern recognition. In: Proc. of the 8th IWFHR, pp. 195–200 (2002)
Ferreiro, S., Arana, R., Aizpurua, G., Aramendi, G., Arnaiz, A., Sierra, B.: Data Mining for Burr Detection (in the Drilling Process). In: Proceedings of the 10th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Network, Salamanca, Spain, June 10-12 (2009)
Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics, 2nd edn., XXIX, 487 p. 28 illus. Springer, NY (2002) ISBN 978-0-387-95442-4
Carrascal, A., Díez, A., Azpeitia, A.: Unsupervised Methods for Anomalies Detection through Intelligent Monitoring Systems. In: Corchado, E., Wu, X., Oja, E., Herrero, Á., Baruque, B. (eds.) HAIS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5572, pp. 137–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Kotsiantis, S.B.: Supervised Machine Learning. A Review of Classification Techniques, Informatics 31, 249–268 (2007)
Wu, X., Kumar, V., Ross Quinlan, J., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., McLachlan, G., Ng, A., Liu, B., Yu, P., Zhou, Z.-H., Steinbach, M., Hand, D., Steinberg, D.: Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems 14(1), 1–37 (2008)
Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive Bayes classifier. In: IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence (2001)
Aha, D., Kibler, D.: Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6, 37–66 (1991)
Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J.: An Introduction to Support Vector Machines. Cambridge University Press (2000)
Powell, M.J.D.: Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: a review. In: Mason, J.C., Cox, M.G. (eds.) Algortithms for Approximation on Functions and Data, pp. 143–167. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)
Quinlan: C4.5. Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)
Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1(1), 81–106 (1986)
Cohen, W.W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Internacional Conference on Machine Learning (1995)
Fürnkranz, J., Widner, G.: Incremental Reduced Error Pruning. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Internacional Conference on Machine Learning (1994)
Stone, M.: Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 36, 111–147 (1974)
Kittler, J., Hated, M., Duin, R.P.W., Matas, J.: On Combining Classifiers. IEEE Transactions PAMI 20, 226–239 (1998)
Verma, B., Gader, P., Chen, W.: Fusion of multiple handwritten word recognition techniques. Patt. Recog. Lett. 22, 991–998 (2001)
Dietterich, T.G.: Machine learning research: Four current directions. AI Magazine 18(4), 97–136 (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Diez, A., Carrascal, A. (2012). A Multiclassifier Approach for Drill Wear Prediction. In: Perner, P. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. MLDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31536-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31537-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)