Skip to main content

Evaluating Top Information Technology Firms in Standard and Poor’s 500 Index by Using a Multiple Objective Programming Based Data Envelopment Analysis

  • Conference paper
Advanced Research in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2012)

Abstract

Information technology (IT) is defined as the obtainment, procedure, storage and propagation of sounding, drawing, and textual information by combining microelectronics-based computing and telecommunications. Nowadays, IT is starting to spread further from the conventional personal computer and network technologies to integrations of other fields of technology such as the use of cell phones, televisions, automobiles, etc. In other words, IT has penetrated in daily life of human beings and become one part of the whole society. The importance of IT has become momentous. Therefore, to understand the performance of efficiency and productivity of the IT firms is critical for managers as well as for personal investors. Until now, there are very few researches tried to analyze final performance of the IT firms. As a result, this research intends to use traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) CCR or BCC models to evaluate the performance of IT firms. The Decision Making Units (DMUs) on this research are chosen from IT firms in S&P 500. However, the traditional DEA models are not fair models from the aspect of improper weight derivations. Thus, this paper intends to analyze the efficiency of IT firms in S&P 500 efficiencies by using multiple objective programming (MOP) based Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In a MOP based DEA approach, DMUs will be evaluated based on an equal standard and the results will be evaluated more fairly. The world’s leading IT firms in S&P 500 will be evaluated based on publicly available financial reports of the fiscal year 2010. In addition, the newly developed MOP can improve the traditional DEA’s unfair weights problems and benchmark the efficiency of IT firms in S&P 500 correctly. In the empirical study, the MOP based DEA demonstrated that F5 Networks should be the communications equipment companies of IT worthwhile to be invested. In the future, performance evaluation results can be served as foundations for investment strategies definition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jorgenson, D.W.: Information Technology and the U.S. Economy. The American Economic Review 91(1), 1–32 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips, P.A.: Performance measurement systems and hotels: a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Hospitality Management 18(2), 171–182 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lewin, A.Y., Minton, J.W.: Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research. Management Science 32(5), 514–538 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6), 429–444 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Fare, R., Hunsaker, W.: Notions of efficiency and their reference sets. Management Science 32(2), 237–243 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang, C.I., Tzeng, G.H.: A new efficiency measure for DEA: efficiency achievement measure established on fuzzy multiple objectives programming. Journal of Management 17(2), 369–388 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chiang, C.I., Tzeng, G.H.: A multiple objective programming approach to data envelopment analysis. In: Shi, Y. (ed.) New Frontiers of Decision Making for the Information Technology Era. World Science, Hong Kong (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helms, M.M.: Encyclopaedia of Management, 5th edn. Thomson Gale (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sumanth, D.J.: Productivity engineering and management. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tangen, S.: Demystifying productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 54(1), 34–46 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Coelli, T., Prasada Rao, D.S., O’Donnell, C.J., Battese, G.E.: An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Emrouznejad, A.: Data Envelopment Analysis Homepage (1995), http://www.DEAzone.com

  13. Harbour, J.L.: The performance Paradox: understanding the real drivers that critically affect outcomes. Productivity Press Taylor & Francis Group (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Collin, S.M.H.: Dictionary of ICT, 4th edn. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bruton, N.: Managing the IT services process, p. 95. Butterworth Heinemann (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harry, P.: Performance Measurement Principles and Techniques: An Overview for Local Government. Public Productivity Review 4(4), 312–339 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grinstein, A., Goldman, A.: Characterizing the technology firm: An exploratory study. Research Policy 35, 121–143 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park, S., Hartley, J., Wilson, D.: Quality management practices and their relationship to buyers’ supplier ratings: A study in the Korean automotive industry. Journal of Operations Management 268, 1–18 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cardy, R.L., Dobbins, R.H.: Human resources, high technology, and a quality organizational environment: Research agendas. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 6(2), 261–279 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowonder, B.Y., Yadav, S.: R&D spending patterns of global firms. Research Technology Management 42(6), 44–55 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deeds, D.L.: The role of R&D intensity, technical development and absorptive capacity in creating entrepreneurial wealth in high technology startups. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 18(1), 29–47 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fare, R., Grabowaski, R., Grosskopf, S.: Technical efficiency of Philippine agriculture. Applied Economics 17(2), 205–214 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chiang, C.I., Tzeng, G.H.: A New Efficiency Measure for DEA: Efficiency Achievement Measure Established on Fuzzy Multiple Objectives Programming. Journal of Management 17(2), 369–388 (2000a)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiang, C.I., Tzeng, G.H.: A multiple objective programming approach to data envelopment analysis. In: Shi, Y., Zeleny, M. (eds.) New Frontiers of Decision Making for the Information Technology Era, pp. 270–285. World Science Publishing Company, Singapore (2000b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Farrell, M.J.: The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120(3), 253–291 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9), 1078–1092 (1984)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Charnes, A., Clark, T., Cooper, W.W., Golany, B.: A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the US Air Force. Annals of Operations Research 2(1), 95–112 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, J.R., Tzeng, Y.C., Tzeng, G.H., Yu, Z.Y., Sheu, H.J.: A fuzzy multiple objective programming to DEA with imprecise data. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness & Knowledge-Based Systems 12(5), 591–600 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sakawa, M., Yumine, T.: Interactive fuzzy decision-making for multi-objective linear fractional programming problems. Large Scale Systems 5, 105–114 (1983)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakawa, M., Yano, H.: Interactive decision making for multi- objective linear fractional programming problems with parameters. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal 16, 377–394 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Ohta, H., Yamaguchi, T.: Multi-goal programming including fractional goal in consideration of fuzzy solutions. Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and System 7, 1221–1228 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy. Sets and Systems 1(1), 45–55 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huang, CY., Wang, PY., Tzeng, GH. (2012). Evaluating Top Information Technology Firms in Standard and Poor’s 500 Index by Using a Multiple Objective Programming Based Data Envelopment Analysis. In: Jiang, H., Ding, W., Ali, M., Wu, X. (eds) Advanced Research in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7345. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31087-4_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31087-4_73

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31086-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31087-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics