Skip to main content

Head Rotation in Labor and Intrapartum Sonography Diagnosis with 2D and 3D

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management

Abstract

Fetal head descent in the second stage of labor is a dynamically complex process characterized by the coordinate and simultaneous occurrence of descent, rotation, and deflexion within the birth canal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cunningham F, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC 3rd, Hankins GDV et al (1997) Anatomy of the reproductive tract. In: Licht J (ed) Williams obstetrics. Appleton & Lange, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, hauth JC, Wenstrom KD (1997) Mechanisms of normal labour. In Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hankins. Willoams Obstetrics, 20th ed., stamford, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dupuis O, Ruimark S, Corrine D, Simone T, Andre D, Rene-Charles R (2005) Fetal head position during the second stage of labor: comparison of digital and vaginal examination and transabdominal ultrasonographic examination. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123:193–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E (2003) Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 101:915–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2006) Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Howard R, Osei E, Nicolaides KH (2004) Investigation of occipito posterior delivery by intrapartum sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:425–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gei AF, Smith RA, Hankins GD (2003) Brachial plexus paresis associated with fetal neck compression from forceps. Am J Perinatol 20:289–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mola GD, Amoa AB, Edilyong J (2002) Factors associated with success or failure in trials of vacuum extraction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:35–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vacca A, Keirse MJNC (1989) Instrumental vaginal delivery. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJN (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1216–1233

    Google Scholar 

  10. Olagundoye V, MacKenzie IZ (2007) The impact of a trial of instrumental delivery in theatre on neonatal outcome. BJOG 114:603–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM (1999) Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 341:1709–1714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth J, Landon MB, Thom E, Spong CY, Varner MW, Moawad AH, Caritis SN, Harper M, Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Miodovnik M, O’Sullivan MJ, Sibai BM, Langer O, Gabbe SG (2006) National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 108:885–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R (2003) Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. BJOG 110:610–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HC (2001) Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108:383–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cunningham F, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC (1997) Dystocia. In: Lange A (ed) Williams obstetrics, vol 1. Appleton Lange, Stamford, p 449

    Google Scholar 

  16. Akmal S, Kametas N, Tsoi E, Hargreaves C, Nicolaides KH (2003) Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:437–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Nicolaides KH (2004) Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal occipital position: interobserver agreement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:421–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley S, Langer O (2002) Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sherer DM, Miodovnik M, Bradley KS, Langer O (2002) Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:264–268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Souka AP, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A (2003) Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 13:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kreiser D, Schiff E, Lipitz S, Kayam Z, Avraham A, Achiron R (2001) Determination of fetal occiput position by ultrasound during the second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Med 10:283–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, Puertas A, Nicolaides KH (2010) What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:493–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Blasi I, D’Amico R, Fenu V, Volpe A, Fuchs I, Henrich W, Mazza V (2010) Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:210–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G (2009) Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33:331–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghi T, Contro E, Farina A, Nobile M, Pilu G (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:500–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tullio Ghi M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghi, T., Youssef, A., Maroni, E., Pilu, G., Rizzo, N. (2012). Head Rotation in Labor and Intrapartum Sonography Diagnosis with 2D and 3D. In: Malvasi, A. (eds) Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29939-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29939-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29938-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29939-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics