Skip to main content

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: Logics for a Temporal Account of Reparations and Legal Compliance

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6814))

Abstract

In this paper we extend the logic of violation proposed by [14] with time, more precisely, we temporalise that logic. The resulting system allows us to capture many subtleties of the concept of legal compliance. In particular, the formal characterisation of compliance can handle different types of legal obligation and different temporal constraints over them. The logic is also able to represent, and reason about, chains of reparative obligations, since in many cases the fulfillment of these types of obligation still amount to legally acceptable situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberti, M., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Compliance verification of agent interaction: a logic-based software tool. Applied Artificial Intelligence 20(2-4), 133–157 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G., Maher, M.: A flexible framework for defeasible logics. In: Proc. AAAI-2000. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., Broersen, J., van der Torre, L.: Reasoning about constitutive norms, counts-as conditionals, institutions, deadlines and violations. In: Bui, T.D., Ho, T.V., Ha, Q.T. (eds.) PRIMA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5357, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Fulfilling or violating obligations in multiagent systems. In: Procs. IAT 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bou, E., López-Sánchez, M., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Adaptation of autonomic electronic institutions through norms and institutional agents. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 300–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Broersen, J., van der Torre, L.: Conditional norms and dyadic obligations in time. In: Proc. ECAI 2008. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carmo, J., Jones, A.J.I.: Deontic logic and contrary to duties. In: Gabbay, D., Guenther, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dastani, M., Grossi, D., Meyer, J.-J.C., Tinnemeier, N.: Normative multi-agent programs and their logics. In: Bordini, R., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah-Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) Programming Multi-Agent Systems, Dagstuhl, Germany. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, vol. 08361. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Esteva, M., Rosell, B., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Arcos, J.L.: Ameli: An agent-based middleware for electronic institutions. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2004, vol. 3394. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pasquier, P., Flores, R., Chaib-draa, B.: Modelling flexible social commitments and their enforcement. In: Gleizes, M.-P., Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) ESAW 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3451, pp. 139–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gaertner, D., Garcia-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodriguez-Aguilar, J.-A., Vasconcelos, W.: Distributed norm management in regulated multiagent systems. In: Proc. AAMAS 2007. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Governatori, G.: Representing business contracts in RuleML. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 14(2-3), 181–216 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Governatori, G., Hulstijn, J., Riveret, R., Rotolo, A.: Characterising deadlines in temporal modal defeasible logic. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 486–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Logic of violations: A Gentzen system for reasoning with contrary-to-duty obligations. Australasian Journal of Logic 44, 193–215 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: An algorithm for business process compliance. In: Sartor, G. (ed.) Jurix 2008, pp. 186–191. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic. In: 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2005), pp. 25–34 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grossi, D., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Ubi lex, ibi poena: Designing norm enforcement in e-institutions. In: In Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Multi-Agent Systems II. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herrestad, H.: Norms and formalization. In: ICAIL, pp. 175–184 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hübner, J.F., Boissier, O., Bordini, R.: From organisation specification to normative programming in multi-agent organisations. In: Dix, J., Leite, J., Governatori, G., Jamroga, W. (eds.) CLIMA XI. LNCS, vol. 6245, pp. 117–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. López y López F., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M.: Constraining autonomy through norms. In: Proc. AAMAS 2002. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marín, R.H., Sartor, G.: Time and norms: a formalisation in the event-calculus. In: ICAIL, pp. 90–99 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, C., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Temporal reasoning and mas. In: SNAMAS 2010 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Benthem, J., Grossi, D., Liu, F.: Deontics = betterness + priority. In: Governatori, G., Sartor, G. (eds.) DEON 2010. LNCS, vol. 6181, pp. 50–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Torre, L., Boella, G., Verhagen, H. (eds.): Normative Multi-agent Systems, Special Issue of JAAMAS, vol. 17(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Eck, J.: A system of temporally relative modal and deontic predicate logic and its philosophical applications. Logique et Analyse 25, 339–381 (1982)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Governatori, G., Rotolo, A. (2011). Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: Logics for a Temporal Account of Reparations and Legal Compliance. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P., Ågotnes, T., Boella, G., van der Torre, L. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6814. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22358-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22359-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics