Skip to main content

Role of Humo-Enzyme Complexes in Restoring of Soil Ecosystems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Soil Enzymology in the Recycling of Organic Wastes and Environmental Restoration

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

  • 1134 Accesses

Abstract

Conventional chemical (total organic carbon, total nitrogen, C/N ratio), biochemical (total and extracellular β-glucosidase, ATP, dehydrogenase) and unconventional IEF parameters (active humic carbon, humic-bound β-glucosidase activity), were used in the monitoring of the changes in biochemical properties caused by organic amendment practices. Two soil ecosystems characterized by a gradient of different grass covers, i.e. (1) a natural Catena (control) and (2) a managed Catena altered by amending practices were selected in a semi arid zone of the Mediterranean (Murcia region, Spain). Both natural and managed Catenas showed activation of carbon cycle which gradually shifted vegetal carbon toward the humic substance formation and accumulation of active humic-β-glucosidase complexes. The model of study and the correlation among the selected parameters, has permitted to discriminate even little differences in soil biochemical properties and, on the basis of these properties, to rank the soil ecosystems in a decreasing order of quality: forest > shrub > bare. There was a narrow correlation between amount of humic carbon forms and humic-associated enzyme-activity, demonstrating that a sort of humification in situ was steadily taking place even after years and likely sustained by plant root exudates. The combination of UF and IEF resulted very efficient in the characterization of humic-enzyme complexes and biochemical processes which drive the humic substances formation, storage and activity in soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benítez E, Nogales R, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (2000) Isolation by isoelectric focusing of humic urease complexes from earthworm (Eisenia foetida)-processed sewage sludges. Biol Fertil Soils 31:489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez E, Melgar R, Nogales R (2004) Estimating soil resilience to a toxic organic waste by measuring enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1615–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canali S, Trinchera A, Pinzari F, Benedetti A (1998) Study of compost maturity by means of humification parameters and isoelectrofocusing technique. In: Proceedings of the 16th world congress of soil science. Montpellier, France, 20–26 August, Paper no. 778 (CD-ROM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Masciandaro G (2003) Stable humus-enzyme nucleus: the last barrier against soil desertification. In: Lobo MC, Ibañez JJ (eds) Preserving soil quality and soil biodiversity: the role of surrogate indicators CSIC-IMIA. Madrid, Spain, pp 77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Nannipieri P, Cervelli S, Sequi P (1978) Fractionation of humus-urease complex. Soil Biol Biochem 10:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Bonmatí-Pont M, Nannipieri P (1989) Microdetermination of protease activity in humic bands of different sizes after analytical isoelectic focusing. Biol Fertil Soils 7:202–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Pezzarossa B, Gallardo-Lancho FJ, Masciandaro G (1994) Bio-tests as markers of soil utilization and fertility. Geomicrobiol J 11:309–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccanti B, Doni S, Macci C, Cercignani G, Masciandaro G (2008) Characterization of stable humic-enzyme complexes of different soil ecosystems through analytical isoelectric focussing technique (IEF). Soil Biol Biochem 40:2174–2177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CR, Condron LM, Davis MR, Sherlock RR (2003) Seasonal changes in soil phosphorus and associated microbial properties under adjacent grassland and forest in New Zealand. For Ecol Manag 177:539–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciardi C, Nannipieri P (1990) A comparison of methods for measuring ATP in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 22:725–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavatta C, Govi M (1993) Use of insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone and isoelectric focusing in the study of humic substances in soils and organic wastes. J Chromatogr 643:261–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doni S, Macci C, Peruzzi E, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (2009) Factors controlling carbon metabolism and humification process in different soil agro-ecosystems. In: Dilly O, Pfeiffer E-M (eds) Book of abstracts XIXth International symposium on environmental biogeochemistry environmental changes and sustainability of biogeochemical cycling. University of Hamburg-Klima Campus, Hamburg, Germany, p 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW, Coleman DC, Bezdicek DF, Stewart BA (eds) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. Special Publication 35. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein AR (1996) Multivariable analysis. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M, Govaerts B, de León F, Hidalgo C, Dendooven L, Sayre KD, Etchevers J (2009) Fourteen years of applying zero and conventional tillage, crop rotation and residue management systems and its effect on physical and chemical soil quality. Eur J Agron 30:228–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • García C, Roldán A, Hernández T (1997) Changes in microbial activity after abandonment of cultivation in a semiarid Mediterranean environment. J Environ Qual 26:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Sotres F, Trasar-Cepeda MC, Ciardi C, Ceccanti B, Leirós MC (1992) Biochemical characterization of biological activity in very young mine soils. Biol Fertil Soils 13:25–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Sotres F, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leirós MC, Seoane S (2005) Different approaches to evaluating soil quality using biochemical properties. Soil Biol Biochem 37:877–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klein DA, Sorensen DL, Redente EF (1985) Soil enzyme: a predictor of reclamation potential and progress. In: Tate RL, Klein DL (eds) Soil reclamation processes: microbiological analysis and applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 141–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Lähdesmäki P, Piispanen R (1992) Soil enzymology: role of protective colloid systems in the preservation of exoenzyme activities in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 24:1173–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manns HR, Maxwell CD, Emery RJN (2007) The effect of ground cover or initial organic carbon on soil fungi, aggregation, moisture and organic carbon in one season with oat (Avena sativa) plots. Soil Till Res 96:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (1999) Assessing soil quality in different agro-ecosystems through biochemical and chemical structural properties of humic substances. Soil Till Res 51:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Ronchi V, Bauer C (2000) Kinetic parameter of dehydrogenase in the assessment of the response of soil to vermicompost and inorganic fertilisers. Biol Fertil Soils 32:479–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ros M, Hernández MT, García C (2003) Soil microbial activity after restoration of a semiarid soil by organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 35:463–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster JJ, Hampton GJ, Leach FR (1984) ATP in soil: a new extractant and extraction procedure. Soil Biol Biochem 4:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeomans JC, Bremner JM (1988) A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Commun Soil Sci Plan 19:1467–1476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out in the framework of the EU project Indicators and threshold for desertification, soil quality and remediation (INDEX-STREP n. 505450, 2004–06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grazia Masciandaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Masciandaro, G., Macci, C., Doni, S., Ceccanti, B. (2011). Role of Humo-Enzyme Complexes in Restoring of Soil Ecosystems. In: Trasar-Cepeda, C., Hernández, T., García, C., Rad, C., González-Carcedo, S. (eds) Soil Enzymology in the Recycling of Organic Wastes and Environmental Restoration. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21162-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics