Skip to main content

An Open Model for Learning Path Construction

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6483))

Abstract

Learning path construction is a complex task. It involves formulating and organizing learning activities, defining ways to evaluate student learning progress and to match such progress with designated learning outcome requirements. Existing methods for adaptive learning path construction typically consider knowledge elements (KEs) as the building blocks and offer mechanisms to select and schedule relevant KEs to form a learning path. However, as KEs may involve variety of delivery and assessment methods, relying on KEs to form building blocks can make learning path construction difficult. To avoid this problem, existing methods restrict KEs to be delivered only through “lecturing” and “question-answering” activities, even though such a restriction greatly affects the usefulness of these methods. In this paper, we propose an open model to formulate learning paths and learning activities. This model can lead to the implementation of a generic system to support learning path design for teachers from any subject disciplines. We have developed a prototype based on this model and conducted a user study to evaluate its effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press, Stony Stratford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay & Co., Inc. (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom’s Taxonomy - Learning Domains, www.businessballs.com/bloomstaxonomyoflearningdomains.htm

  4. Brusilovsky, P.: A Framework for Intelligent Knowledge Sequencing and Task Sequencing. In: Proc. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 499–506 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, C., Liu, C., Chang, M.: Personalized Curriculum Sequencing using Modified Item Response Theory for Web-Based Instruction. Expert Systems with Applications 30(2), 378–396 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalziel, J.: Implementing Learning Design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). In: Proc. ASCILITE, pp. 593–596 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dodridge, M.: Learning Outcomes and Their Assessment in Higher Education. Engineering Science and Education Journal 8(4), 161–168 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Farrell, R., Liburd, S., Thomas, J.: Dynamic Assembly of Learning Objects. In: Proc. World Wide Web, pp. 162–169 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karampiperis, P., Sampson, D.: Adaptive Learning Resources Sequencing in Educational Hypermedia Systems. Educational Technology & Society 8(4), 128–147 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koretsky, M., et al.: Enhancement of Student Learning in Experimental Design Using a Virtual Laboratory. IEEE Trans. on Education 51(1), 76–85 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Krathwohl D., Bloom B. S., Masia B.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. David McKay Co., Inc. (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M., Vaste, G.: Adaptive Learning with the LS-Plan System: A Field Evaluation. IEEE Trans. on Learning Technologies 2(3), 203–215 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, F., Lau, R., Dharmendran, P.: A Three-Tier Profiling Framework for Adaptive e-Learning. In: Spaniol, M., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Lau, R.W.H. (eds.) ICWL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5686, pp. 235–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, H., Yang, M.: QoL Guaranteed Adaptation and Personalization in E-Learning Systems. IEEE Trans. on Education 48(4), 676–687 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson E.: The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Gryphon House (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, F., Li, F.W.B., Lau, R.W.H. (2010). An Open Model for Learning Path Construction. In: Luo, X., Spaniol, M., Wang, L., Li, Q., Nejdl, W., Zhang, W. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2010. ICWL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6483. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17407-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17407-0_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17406-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17407-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics