Skip to main content

Following the White Rabbit – A Robot Rabbit as Vocabulary Trainer for Beginners of English

  • Conference paper
HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure (USAB 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6389))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The current paper presents a case study conducted to evaluate the robot rabbit Nabaztag functioning as a vocabulary trainer for beginners of English. Hedonic aspects and motivating function, as well as the general usability and overall impression evoked by rabbit, were tested. A group of 18 5th grade students of an English class at a German junior high school were instructed to practice 20 pairs of vocabulary. Ten students were assisted by the speaking robot rabbit, while eight learned by applying an ordinary paper-and-pencil method. Results show that after one week, students who had learned with the Nabaztag had, on average, a higher recall than the control group. Moreover, the evaluation of the hedonic and pragmatic quality of interacting with the rabbit was high, as was the evaluation of both ease of use and perceived usefulness. Students learning with the rabbit were in a better mood afterwards than those who learned by means of the traditional method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H.: Interactive Robots as Social Partners and peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial. Human Computer Interaction 19, 61–84 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bialystok, E., Hakuta, K.: In other words. Basic Books, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McLaughlin, B.: Second language acquisition in childhood. In: Preschool children, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wong Fillmore, L.: When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 6, 323–346 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tabors, P.: One child, two languages. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 8, 30–43 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lester, J.C., Towns, S.G., Callaway, C.B., Voerman, J.L., FitzGerald, P.J.: Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 123–154. MIT Press, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baylor, A., Kim, S.: The effects of agents’ nonverbal communication on procedural and attitudinal learning outcomes. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 208–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Baylor, A.L., Ryu, J.: Does the presence of image and animation enhance pedagogical agent persona? Journal of Educational Computing Research 28, 373–395 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Baylor, A.L.: Permutations of control: Cognitive considerations for agent-based learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 12, 403–425 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Graesser, A.C., D’Mello, S.K., Craig, S.D., Witherspoon, A., Sullins, J., McDaniel, B., Gholson, B.: The relationship between affect states and dialogue patterns during interactions with AutoTutor. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 19, 293–312 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., McDaniel, B.: AutoTutor holds conversations with learners that are responsive to their cognitive and emotional states. Educational Technology 47, 19–22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krämer, N.C., Bente, G.: Personalizing e-learning. The social effects of pedagogical agents. Educational Psychology Review 22, 71–87 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Norman, D.A.: Three levels of design: Visceral, behavioral, and reflective. In: Norman, D.A. (ed.) Emotional Design, pp. 63–98. Basic Books, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Overbeeke, K., Djajadiningrat, T., Hummels, C., Wensveen, S., Frens, J.: Let’s make things engaging. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology. From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 7–17. Kluwer Academic Press, Netherlands (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Martens, J.-B.: User experience over time: An initial framework. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 729–738 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seligman, M.E.P., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist 55(1), 5–14 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jordan, P.W.: Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29(1), 25–33 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaver, B., Martin, H.: Alternatives: Exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 209–216 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jordan, P.W.: Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors, pp. 1–57. Taylor & Francis, London (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright, P., Wallace, J., McCarthy, J.: Aesthetics and experience-centered design. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15(4), 1–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Olivier, P., Wallace, J.: Digital technologies and the emotional family. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67(2), 204–214 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hassenzahl, M.: The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13(4), 481–499 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hassenzahl, M.: The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe, M.A., Mink, A.F., Overbeeke, K., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From usability to enjoyment, pp. 31–42. Kluwer Academic Press, Netherlands (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Burmester, M., Hassenzahl, M., Koller, F.: Usability ist nicht alles - Wege zu attraktiven Produkten [Beyond usability: Appeal of interactive products]. I-com 1, 32–40 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B.A.: Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design, pp. 1–116. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 127 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Johnson, W.L., Shaw, E.: Animated pedagogical agents. An opportunity to be grasped? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 11, 267–286 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Domagk, S.: Pädagogische Agenten in multimedialen Lernumgebungen. Empirische Studien zum Einfluss der Sympathie auf Motivation und Lernerfolg [Pedagogical agents in multimedia learning environments. Empirical studies on the influence of likability on motivation and learning]. Logos, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moreno, R.: Animated pedagogical agents in educational technology. Educational Technology 44, 23–30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Atkinson, R.K.: Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 416–427 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research & Development 54, 569–590 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S., Torrey, C.: Comparing a Computer Agent with a Humoid Robot. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction table of contents Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp. 145–152 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yamato, J., Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Kogure, K.: Evaluation of Communication with Robot and Agent: Are robots better social actors than agents? IEIC Technical Report 100, 15–19 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Han, J., Jo, M., Park, S., Kim, S.: The Educational Use of Home Robots for Children. In: IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chou, C.Y., Chan, T.-W., Lin, C.-J.: Redefining the learning companion: the past, present and future of educational agents. Computer and Education 40, 255–269 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sleeman, D., Brown, J.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Academic Press, London (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wenger, E.: Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bloom, B.S.: The 2 Sigma Problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–16 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Greer, J.E., McCalla, G.I.: Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Mizoguchi, R.: Student Modeling in ITS. In: Chan, T.W., Self, J. (eds.) Emerging Technologies in Education, pp. 35–48. AACE (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Carr, B., Goldstein, I.P.: Overlays. A theory of modeling for computer-aided instruction. AI Lab Meno 406, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Brown, J.S., Burton, R.R.: Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science 2, 155–191 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bente, G., Breuer, J.: Making the Implicit Explicit: Embedded Measurement in Serious Games. In: Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M.J., Vorderer, P. (eds.) The social science of serious games: Theories and applications, Routledge/LEA, Philadelphia, PA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F.: AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität. In: Ziegler, J., Szwillus, G. (eds.) Mensch & Computer 2003. Interaktion in Bewegung, pp. 187–196. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35, 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hassenzahl, M.: The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products. Human Computer Interaction 19, 319–349 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wicklund, R.A., Gollwitzer, P.M.: Symbolic self-completion. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Eimler, S., von der Pütten, A., Ganster, T., Krämer, N.: Lass die Ohren nicht hängen - Eine explorative Studie zum Eindruck des nonverbalen Verhaltens eines Kommunikationsroboters in Form eines Hasen. In: Kongress der deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (2010) (accepted as poster)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Eimler, S., von der Pütten, A., Schächtle, U., Carstens, L., Krämer, N. (2010). Following the White Rabbit – A Robot Rabbit as Vocabulary Trainer for Beginners of English. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds) HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure. USAB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6389. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16606-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16607-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics