Skip to main content

Improving Retrievability and Recall by Automatic Corpus Partitioning

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((TLDKS,volume 6380))

Abstract

With increasing volumes of data, much effort has been devoted to finding the most suitable answer to an information need. However, in many domains, the question whether any specific information item can be found at all via a reasonable set of queries is essential. This concept of Retrievability of information has evolved into an important evaluation measure of IR systems in recall-oriented application domains. While several studies evaluated retrieval bias in systems, solid validation of the impact of retrieval bias and the development of methods to counter low retrievability of certain document types would be desirable.

This paper provides an in-depth study of retrievability characteristics over queries of different length in a large benchmark corpus, validating previous studies. It analyzes the possibility of automatically categorizing documents into low and high retrievable documents based on document properties rather than complex retrievability analysis. We furthermore show, that this classification can be used to improve overall retrievability of documents by treating these classes as separate document corpora, combining individual retrieval results. Experiments are validated on 1.2 million patents of the TREC Chemical Retrieval Track.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Azzopardi, L., Vinay, V.: Retrievability: an evaluation measure for higher order information access tasks. In: CIKM ’08: Proceeding of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 561–570. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baeza-Yates, R.: Applications of web query mining. In: Losada, D.E., Fernández-Luna, J.M. (eds.) ECIR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3408, pp. 7–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bashir, S., Rauber, A.: Analyzing document retrievability in patent retrieval settings. In: Bhowmick, S.S., Küng, J., Wagner, R. (eds.) DEXA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5690, pp. 753–760. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bashir, S., Rauber, A.: Identification of low/high retrievable patents using content-based features. In: PaIR ’09: Proceeding of the 2nd International Workshop on Patent Information Retrieval, pp. 9–16 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Custis, T., Al-Kofahi, K.: A new approach for evaluating query expansion: query-document term mismatch. In: SIGIR ’07: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 575–582. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Doi, H., Seki, Y., Aono, M.: A patent retrieval method using a hierarchy of clusters at tut. In: NTCIR ’05: In Proceedings of NTCIR-5 Workshop Meeting, Tokyo, Japan (December 6-9, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fujii, A.: Enhancing patent retrieval by citation analysis. In: SIGIR ’07: Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 793–794. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf, E., Azzopardi, L.: A methodology for building a patent test collection for prior art search. In: EVIA ’08: The Second International Workshop on Evaluating Information Access, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 60–71 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Itoh, H., Mano, H., Ogawa, Y.: Term distillation in patent retrieval. In: Proceedings of the ACL-2003 Workshop on Patent Corpus Processing, pp. 41–45. Association for Computational Linguistics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan, C., Watters, C., Gao, Q.: Using controlled query generation to evaluate blind relevance feedback algorithms. In: JCDL ’06: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 286–295. ACM, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lupu, M., Huang, J., Zhu, J., Tait, J.: Trec-chem: large scale chemical information retrieval evaluation at trec. SIGIR Forum 43(2), 63–70 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H., Taylor, M.: Simple bm25 extension to multiple weighted fields. In: CIKM ’04: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 42–49. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S.: Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. In: SIGIR ’94: Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 232–241. Springer, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sakai, T.: Comparing metrics across trec and ntcir: the robustness to system bias. In: CIKM ’08: Proceeding of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 581–590. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaughan, L., Thelwall, M.: Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes. Inf. Process. Manage. 40(4), 693–707 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, USA (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Xue, X., Croft, W.B.: Transforming patents into prior-art queries. In: SIGIR ’09: Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 808–809. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhai, C.: Risk minimization and language modeling in text retrieval dissertation abstract. SIGIR Forum 36(2), 100–101 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bashir, S., Rauber, A. (2010). Improving Retrievability and Recall by Automatic Corpus Partitioning. In: Hameurlain, A., Küng, J., Wagner, R., Bach Pedersen, T., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6380. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16175-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16175-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16174-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16175-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics