Skip to main content

Creation Myths of Generative Grammar and the Mathematics of Syntactic Structures

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6149))

Abstract

Syntactic Structures (Chomsky [6]) is widely believed to have laid the foundations of a cognitive revolution in linguistic science, and to have presented (i) the first use in linguistics of powerful new ideas regarding grammars as generative systems, (ii) a proof that English was not a regular language, (iii) decisive syntactic arguments against context-free phrase structure grammar description, and (iv) a demonstration of how transformational rules could provide a formal solution to those problems. None of these things are true. This paper offers a retrospective analysis and evaluation.

This paper is based on an invited presentation at the Mathematics of Language conference at UCLA in August 2007. Many of the ideas here have been profitably discussed with my collaborator Barbara Scholz. I am very grateful to her for her generosity with assistance and advice — not that I have taken all of the advice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, E.: In defense of passive. Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 297–341 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bach, E., Horn, G.M.: Remarks on Conditions on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 265–361 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brainerd, W.S., Landweber, L.H.: Theory of Computation. John Wiley, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chomsky, N.: The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. MIT Library, Cambridge (1956) (microfilmed; revised version of a 1955 unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chomsky, N.: Three models for the description of language. I.R.E. Transactions on Information Theory 2, 113–123 (1956); Reprinted with substantive revisions in Luce, Bush & Galanter ([22]), pp. 105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chomsky, N.: Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chomsky, N.: On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2, 137–167 (1959); Reprinted in Luce, Bush & Galanter [22], pp. 125–155; citation to original is incorrect

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chomsky, N.: On the notion ‘rule of grammar’. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium in Applied Mathematics, pp. 6–24. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1961); Reprinted with slight revision in Fodor, J.A., Katz, J.J. (eds.): The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 155–210. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chomsky, N.: Explanatory models in linguistics. In: Nagel, E., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, pp. 528–550. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chomsky, N.: Conditions on transformations. In: Anderson, S.R., Kiparsky, P. (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chomsky, N., Miller, G.A.: Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In: Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. II, pp. 269–321. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Daly, R.T.: Applications of the Mathematical Theory of Linguistics. Mouton, The Hague (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, M. (ed.): Solvability, Provability, Definability: The Collected Works of Emil L. Post. Birkhäuser, Boston (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fries, C.C.: The Structure of English. Harcourt Brace, New York (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gazdar, G., Pullum, G.K., Sag, I.A.: Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar. Language 58, 591–638 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huddleston, R.: Further remarks on the analysis of auxiliaries as main verbs. Foundations of Language 11, 215–229 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huddleston, R.: An Introduction to English Transformational Syntax. Longman, London (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huddleston, R., Pullum, G.K.: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lasnik, H.: Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lightfoot, D.: Introduction. In: Chomsky, N. (ed.) Syntactic Structures, 2nd edn., pp. v–xviii, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.): Readings in Mathematical Psychology, vol. II. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. McCawley, J.D.: Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 4, 243–269 (1968); Reprinted in McCawley, J.D.: Grammar and Meaning, pp. 35–58. Academic Press, NewYork, Taishukan, Tokyo (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCawley, J.D.: Tense and time reference in English. In: Fillmore, C.J., Langendoen, D.T. (eds.) Studies in Linguistic Semantics, pp. 97–113. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCawley, J.D.: The category status of English modals. Foundations of Language 12, 597–601 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Newmeyer, F.J.: English Aspectual Verbs. Mouton, The Hague (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pelletier, F.J.: The generative power of rule orderings in formal grammars. Linguistics 18(1/2 (227/228)), 17–72 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Post, E.: Formal reductions of the general combinatory decision problem. American Journal of Mathematics 65, 197–215 (1943); Reprinted in Davis [14], pp. 442–460.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Post, E.: Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 50, 284–316 (1944); Reprinted in Davis[14], pp. 461–494.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Post, E.: Recursive unsolvability of a problem of Thue. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 1–11 (1947); Reprinted in Davis [14], pp. 503–513.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Postal, P.M.: Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pullum, G., Wilson, D.: Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Language 53, 741–788 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Putnam, H.: Some issues in the theory of grammar. In: Jakobson, R. (ed.) Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects, No. 12, pp. 25–42. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenbloom, P.: The Elements of Mathematical Logic. Dover, New York (1950)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Ross, J.R.: Auxiliaries as main verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1, 77–102 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sampson, G.: What was transformational grammar? Lingua 48, 355–378 (1979); Reprinted in Empirical Linguistics, Continuum (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Seuren, P.: Concerning the roots of transformational generative grammar. Historiographia Linguistica 36(1), 97–115 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shieber, S.: Evidence against the context-freeness of human language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Svenonius, L.: Review of Three models for the description of language by Noam Chomsky. Journal of Symbolic Logic 23, 71–72 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Thue, A.: Probleme über Veränderungen von Zeichenreihen nach gegebenen Regeln. In: Skrifter utgit av Videnskapsselskapet i Kristiana, I. No. 10 in Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse, Norske Videnskaps-Akademi, Oslo (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Urquhart, A.: Emil Post. In: Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Logic from Russell to Church, vol. 5, pp. 617–666. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pullum, G.K. (2010). Creation Myths of Generative Grammar and the Mathematics of Syntactic Structures . In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Language. MOL MOL 2009 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14321-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14322-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics