Abstract
Syntactic Structures (Chomsky [6]) is widely believed to have laid the foundations of a cognitive revolution in linguistic science, and to have presented (i) the first use in linguistics of powerful new ideas regarding grammars as generative systems, (ii) a proof that English was not a regular language, (iii) decisive syntactic arguments against context-free phrase structure grammar description, and (iv) a demonstration of how transformational rules could provide a formal solution to those problems. None of these things are true. This paper offers a retrospective analysis and evaluation.
This paper is based on an invited presentation at the Mathematics of Language conference at UCLA in August 2007. Many of the ideas here have been profitably discussed with my collaborator Barbara Scholz. I am very grateful to her for her generosity with assistance and advice — not that I have taken all of the advice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bach, E.: In defense of passive. Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 297–341 (1980)
Bach, E., Horn, G.M.: Remarks on Conditions on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 265–361 (1976)
Brainerd, W.S., Landweber, L.H.: Theory of Computation. John Wiley, New York (1974)
Chomsky, N.: The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. MIT Library, Cambridge (1956) (microfilmed; revised version of a 1955 unpublished manuscript)
Chomsky, N.: Three models for the description of language. I.R.E. Transactions on Information Theory 2, 113–123 (1956); Reprinted with substantive revisions in Luce, Bush & Galanter ([22]), pp. 105–124
Chomsky, N.: Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague (1957)
Chomsky, N.: On certain formal properties of grammars. Information and Control 2, 137–167 (1959); Reprinted in Luce, Bush & Galanter [22], pp. 125–155; citation to original is incorrect
Chomsky, N.: On the notion ‘rule of grammar’. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium in Applied Mathematics, pp. 6–24. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1961); Reprinted with slight revision in Fodor, J.A., Katz, J.J. (eds.): The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, pp. 155–210. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Chomsky, N.: Explanatory models in linguistics. In: Nagel, E., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, pp. 528–550. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)
Chomsky, N.: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)
Chomsky, N.: Conditions on transformations. In: Anderson, S.R., Kiparsky, P. (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York (1973)
Chomsky, N., Miller, G.A.: Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In: Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. II, pp. 269–321. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1963)
Daly, R.T.: Applications of the Mathematical Theory of Linguistics. Mouton, The Hague (1974)
Davis, M. (ed.): Solvability, Provability, Definability: The Collected Works of Emil L. Post. Birkhäuser, Boston (1994)
Fries, C.C.: The Structure of English. Harcourt Brace, New York (1952)
Gazdar, G., Pullum, G.K., Sag, I.A.: Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar. Language 58, 591–638 (1982)
Huddleston, R.: Further remarks on the analysis of auxiliaries as main verbs. Foundations of Language 11, 215–229 (1974)
Huddleston, R.: An Introduction to English Transformational Syntax. Longman, London (1976)
Huddleston, R., Pullum, G.K.: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Lasnik, H.: Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Lightfoot, D.: Introduction. In: Chomsky, N. (ed.) Syntactic Structures, 2nd edn., pp. v–xviii, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2002)
Luce, R.D., Bush, R.R., Galanter, E. (eds.): Readings in Mathematical Psychology, vol. II. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1965)
McCawley, J.D.: Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 4, 243–269 (1968); Reprinted in McCawley, J.D.: Grammar and Meaning, pp. 35–58. Academic Press, NewYork, Taishukan, Tokyo (1973)
McCawley, J.D.: Tense and time reference in English. In: Fillmore, C.J., Langendoen, D.T. (eds.) Studies in Linguistic Semantics, pp. 97–113. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1971)
McCawley, J.D.: The category status of English modals. Foundations of Language 12, 597–601 (1975)
Newmeyer, F.J.: English Aspectual Verbs. Mouton, The Hague (1975)
Pelletier, F.J.: The generative power of rule orderings in formal grammars. Linguistics 18(1/2 (227/228)), 17–72 (1980)
Post, E.: Formal reductions of the general combinatory decision problem. American Journal of Mathematics 65, 197–215 (1943); Reprinted in Davis [14], pp. 442–460.
Post, E.: Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 50, 284–316 (1944); Reprinted in Davis[14], pp. 461–494.
Post, E.: Recursive unsolvability of a problem of Thue. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 1–11 (1947); Reprinted in Davis [14], pp. 503–513.
Postal, P.M.: Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)
Pullum, G., Wilson, D.: Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries. Language 53, 741–788 (1977)
Putnam, H.: Some issues in the theory of grammar. In: Jakobson, R. (ed.) Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects, No. 12, pp. 25–42. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1961)
Rosenbloom, P.: The Elements of Mathematical Logic. Dover, New York (1950)
Ross, J.R.: Auxiliaries as main verbs. Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1, 77–102 (1967)
Sampson, G.: What was transformational grammar? Lingua 48, 355–378 (1979); Reprinted in Empirical Linguistics, Continuum (2001)
Seuren, P.: Concerning the roots of transformational generative grammar. Historiographia Linguistica 36(1), 97–115 (2009)
Shieber, S.: Evidence against the context-freeness of human language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 333–343 (1985)
Svenonius, L.: Review of Three models for the description of language by Noam Chomsky. Journal of Symbolic Logic 23, 71–72 (1957)
Thue, A.: Probleme über Veränderungen von Zeichenreihen nach gegebenen Regeln. In: Skrifter utgit av Videnskapsselskapet i Kristiana, I. No. 10 in Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig klasse, Norske Videnskaps-Akademi, Oslo (1914)
Urquhart, A.: Emil Post. In: Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Logic from Russell to Church, vol. 5, pp. 617–666. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pullum, G.K. (2010). Creation Myths of Generative Grammar and the Mathematics of Syntactic Structures . In: Ebert, C., Jäger, G., Michaelis, J. (eds) The Mathematics of Language. MOL MOL 2009 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6149. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14322-9_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14321-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14322-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)