Skip to main content

Vague Relations in Spatial Databases

  • Conference paper
Book cover Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6177))

  • 1296 Accesses

Abstract

While qualitative relations (e.g. RCC8 relations) can readily be derived from spatial databases, a more difficult matter is the representation of vague spatial relations such as ‘near-to’,‘next-to’, ‘between’, etc. After surveying earlier approaches, this paper proposes a method that is tractable, learnable and directly suitable for use in natural language interfaces to spatial databases. The approach is based on definite logic programs with contexts represented as first class objects and supervaluation over a set of threshold parameters. Given an initial hand-built program with open threshold parameters, a polynomial-time algorithm finds a setting of threshold parameters that are consistent with a training corpus of vague descriptions of scenes. The results of this algorithm may then be compiled into view definitions which are accessed in real-time by natural language interfaces employing normal, non-exotic query answering mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shekhar, S., Chawla, S.: Spatial Databases: A Tour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guttman, A.: R-trees: A dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In: SIGMOD 1984, June 18-21, pp. 47–57. ACM Press, New York (1984)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hellerstein, J., Naughton, J., Pfeffer, A.: Generalized search trees for database systems. In: VLDB, pp. 562–573 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dilo, A., de By, R.A., Stein, A.: A system of types and operators for handling vague spatial objects. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21(4), 397–426 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Altman, D.: Fuzzy set theoretic approaches for handling imprecision in spatial analysis. Journal of Geographical Information System IBM 8(3), 271–289 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, F.: Handling grammatical errors, ambiguity and impreciseness in GIS natural language queries. Transactions in GIS 7(1), 103–121 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roy, A.J., Stell, J.G.: Spatial relations between indeterminate regions. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 27(3), 205–234 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Randell, D., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: KR, pp. 165–176 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn, A.G., Gotts, N.M.: Representing spatial vagueness: A mereological approach. In: KR, pp. 230–241 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fine, K.: Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthèse 30, 263–300 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goyal, N., Shoham, Y.: Reasoning precisely with vague concepts. In: AAAI, pp. 426–431 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Santos, P., Bennett, B., Sakellariou, G.: Supervaluation semantics for an inland water feature ontology. In: IJCAI, pp. 564–569 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pulman, S.: Formal and computational semantics: a case study. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics: IWCS-7, Tilburg, The Netherlands, pp. 181–196 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bennett, B., Mallenby, D., Third, A.: An ontology for grounding vague geographic terms. In: FOIS, pp. 280–293 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bennett, B.: A theory of vague adjectives grounded in relevant observables. In: KR, pp. 36–45 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mador-Haim, S., Winter, Y., Braun, A.: Controlled language for geographical information system queries. In: Proceedings of Inference in Computational Semantics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weidenbach, C., Brahm, U., Hillenbrand, T., Keen, E., Theobalt, C., Topić, D.: SPASS version 2.0. In: 18th International Conference on Automated Deduction, Kopenhagen, Denmark, pp. 275–279 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Minock, M.: C-phrase: A system for building robust natural language interfaces to databases. Data and Knowledge Engineering 69(3), 290–302 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinker, S.: The Stuff of Thought. Penguin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Minock, M.J. (2010). Vague Relations in Spatial Databases. In: Hopfe, C.J., Rezgui, Y., Métais, E., Preece, A., Li, H. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13881-2_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13880-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13881-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics