Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Heat and Power Production from Stover for Corn Ethanol Plants

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plant Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Energy and Co-products

Part of the book series: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry ((AGRICULTURE,volume 66))

  • 1550 Accesses

Abstract

Supply of corn stover to produce heat and power for a typical 170 million L (45 million gallon) dry mill ethanol plant is proposed. The corn ethanol plant requires 5.6 MW electricity and 52.3 MW process heat, which creates an annual stover demand of as much as 150 million Mg (Mg = 1,000,000 g = 1 metric ton). The stover supply system consists of collection, pre-processing, transportation and on-site fuel storage and preparation to produce heat and power. Economics of the entire supply system was conducted using the Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis and Logistics (IBSAL) simulation model. Corn stover was delivered in three formats (square bales, dry chops and pellets) to the ethanol plant. Among the three formats of stover supply systems, cost of chopped biomass was highest due to the high transportation cost and low bulk density. The economics of the stover fired heat generation system was assessed using a discounted cash flow method and compared with coal- and natural gas-fired systems. Although the capital investment cost of natural gas-fired heat generation system was relatively low, annual operating costs were the highest compared to the stover and coal-fired heating system. The coal-fired heating system had the lowest annual operating cost due to the low fuel cost, but had the highest environmental and human toxicity impacts. Combined heat and power (CHP) generation systems have high thermal efficiency, onsite power utilization and lower environmental impacts than process heat generation systems. A corn-stover-fired CHP plant was proposed to supply both power and process heat for the corn ethanol plant. The proposed CHP system required 137,450 Mg stover to generate 9.5 MWe of power and 52.3 MWth of process heat with an overall CHP efficiency of 83.3%. Economic analysis of the stover-fired CHP system was compared with that of both coal and a combination of coal and stover fuel options along with an environmental impact analysis. Annual savings from the CHP plant were calculated by comparing the existing energy input conditions for the corn ethanol plant. The stover-fired CHP system would generate annual savings of US $3.61 million with a payback period of 6 years. The economics of the coal-fired CHP system were relatively attractive compared to the stover-fired CHP system. but greenhouse gas emissions for the coal-fired CHP system were 20 times greater than that of stover-fired CHP system. Co-firing of stover with coal may balance out the environmental impacts and economics of the CHP system. We envision that creating demand for biomass will build infrastructures to deliver biomass fuel, which will further reduce the cost of biomass

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Statements in this paper represent the authors’ research and personal view points. The statements and data are not official

References

  • American Coalition for Ethanol (2006) US Ethanol Production. Available via DIALOG. http://www.ethanol.org/production.html. Cited 15 June 2006

  • Bhatt MS (2001) Mapping of general combined heat and power systems. Energy Convers Manage 42:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton M (2006) Carbon cloud over a green fuel. Available via DIALOG. http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0323/p01s01-sten.html. Cited 15 June 2006

  • CSLF (2006) An energy summary of the United States of America. Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum. Available via DIALOG. http://www.cslforum.org/usa.htm. Cited 15 June 2006

  • Cundiff JS (1995) Delayed harvest of switchgrass. 1994–1995 Annual Report. Biological Systems Engineering Department. Virginia Tech. Blacksburg, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundiff JS (1996) Simulation of five large round bale harvesting systems for biomass. Bioresour Technol 56:77–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cundiff JS, Marsh LS (1996) Harvest and storage costs for bales of switchgrass in the southern United States. Bioresour Technol 56:95–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CVRC&D (2002) Chariton Valley biomass project—design package. Prepared for USDOE under Contract #DE–FC36–96 G010148. Chariton Valley RC&D Centerville, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • CVRC&D (2004) Chariton Valley biomass project—Department of Energy project update. Available via DIALOG. http://biomass.ecria.com/technical∼engineering.html. Cited 15 March 2006

  • EDUCOGEN (2001) A guide to cogeneration. Contract No. XV11/4. 1031/P/99-159. The European Association for the Promotion of Cogeneration, Brussels, Belgium. Available via DIALOG http://www.cogen.org. Cited 15 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA-CHP (2002) Catalogue of CHP technologies. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher P, Dikerman M, Fritz J (2003) Biomass crop residues: cost and supply estimates. Report no. 819. USDA Office of Chief Economist, Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani S (2005) A systems analysis of biomass densification process. PhD Dissertation, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC:

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani S, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Turhollow AF (2006a) Economics of producing fuel pellets from biomass. Appl Eng Agric 22(3):421–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S (2006b) Effects of compressive force, particle size and moisture content on mechanical properties of biomass pellets from grasses. Biomass Bioenergy 30:648–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morey RV, Tiffany DG, Hatfield DL (2005) Biomass for electricity and process heat at ethanol plants. ASABE paper # 056131. ASABE, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • ONSITE SYCOM (1999) Review of CHP technologies. Grant no. 98R020974. US Department of Energy, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stokes B, Erbach DC (2006) Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion ton annual supply. Report # ORNL/TM-2005/66. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN, 2005. Available via DIALOG. http://www.osti.gov/bridge. Cited 15 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Savola T, Fogelholm CJ (2006) Increased power to heat ratio of small scale CHP system using biomass fuels and natural gas. Energy Convers Manage 47:3105–3118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapouri H, Duffield JA, Wang M (1999) The energy balance of corn ethanol revisited. Trans ASAE 46(4):959–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapouri H, Duffield JA, Wang M (2002) The energy balance of corn ethanol: an update, Agricultural Economic Report No. 813, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Mani S (2006) Modeling of biomass supply logistics. In: Bridgewater AV, Bobcock BDG (eds) Science in thermal and chemical biomass conversion, vol 1. CPL, Newbury Perks, UK, pp 387–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Turhollow AF (2002) Baseline cost for corn stover collection. Appl Eng Agric 18(5):38–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Turhollow AF (2004) Biomass densification—cubing operations and costs. Appl Eng Agric 20(4):495–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Turhollow AF, Cushman J, Cundiff J (2002) Engineering aspects of collecting corn stover for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 23:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokhansanj S, Kumar A, Turhollow AF (2006) Development and implementation of integrated biomass supply analysis and logistics (IBSAL) model. Biomass Bioenergy 30:838–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2006) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2004. USEPA report # 430-R-06-002. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek R, Faaij A, van Wijk A (1995) Biomass combustion: power generation technologies. Background report 4.1. Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlund B (2003) Regional bioenergy utilization in energy systems and impacts on CO2 emission. PhD Dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Saricks C, Santini D (1999) Effects of fuel ethanol use on fuel-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions. Argonne National Laboratory, ANL/ESD-38; 1999. Available via DIALOG. http://www.ipd.anl.gov, Cited 12 December 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright CT, Pyrofogle PA, Stevens NA, Hess JA, Radtke CW (2006) Value of distributed preprocessing of biomass feedstock to a bioenergy industry. ASABE Paper No. 066151. ASABE, St. Joseph, MI

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and the Office of Biomass Program, US Department of Energy (DOE), for providing funding to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2008, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA

    Shahab Sokhansanj

  2. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2360 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada

    Shahab Sokhansanj & Cannayen Igathinathane

  3. Driftmier Engineering Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Sudhagar Mani

  4. Office of Biomass Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 20585, USA

    Sam Tagore

Authors
  1. Shahab Sokhansanj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sudhagar Mani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cannayen Igathinathane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sam Tagore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shahab Sokhansanj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ceres, Inc., Rancho Conejo Blvd. 1535, Thousand Oaks, 91320, California, USA

    Peter N. Mascia

  2. ZMAW, Institute for Geography, University of Hamburg, Bundesstr. 53, Hamburg, 20146, Germany

    Jürgen Scheffran

  3. Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, W. Gregory, ERML 1201, Urbana, 61801, Illinois, USA

    Jack M. Widholm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sokhansanj, S., Mani, S., Igathinathane, C., Tagore, S. (2010). Heat and Power Production from Stover for Corn Ethanol Plants. In: Mascia, P., Scheffran, J., Widholm, J. (eds) Plant Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Energy and Co-products. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 66. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13440-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation