Skip to main content

Component Commonality in Closed-Loop Supply Chain

  • Conference paper
  • 2660 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 66))

Abstract

Many literatures in forward supply chain management point out the importance of product design. In this research, we follow the same concept and apply it to closed-loop supply chain. We consider two closed-loop supply chain structures, Parallel and Mix. In the Parallel structure, the assembly and disassembly lines are separated while in Mix structure they are performed by the same production line. We study how the usage of component commonality, location of common component, and degree of delayed differentiation impact the mean and variance of the cycle time for forward supply chain under these two structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, K.R., Magazine, M.J., Nuttle, H.L.W.: The effect of commonality on safety stock in a simple inventory model. Management Science 32(8), 982–988 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.C.: Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process. The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C.J., Wee, H.M.: Green-component life-cycle value on design and reverse manufacturing in semi-closed supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 113, 528–545 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D.A.: Aggregate safety stock levels and component part commonality. Management Science 28(11), 1296–1303 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCroix, G.A., Zipkin, P.H.: Inventory management for an assembly system with product or component returns. Management Science 51(8), 1250–1256 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eynan, A., Rosenblatt, M.J.: Component commonality effects on inventory costs. IIE Transactions 28, 93–104 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerchak, Y., Magazine, M.J., Gamble, A.B.: Component commonality with service level requirements. Management Science 34(6), 753–760 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide Jr, V.D.R., Srivasta, R.: Inventory buffers in recoverable manufacturing. Journal of Operations Managements 16, 551–568 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide Jr, V.D.R., Jayaraman, R., Srivasta, R.: Production planning and control for remanufacturing. Robotics and Computer-integrated manufacturing 15(3), 221–230 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guide Jr, V.D.R., Wassenhove, L.N.V.: Managing product returns for remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management 10(2), 142–155 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gungor, A., Gupta, S.M.: Disassembly sequence planning for products with defective parts in product recovery. Computers and Industrial Engineering 35, 161–164 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R., Walton, S.V., Sroufe, R., Melnyk, S.A.: Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: Astudy in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 141, 70–87 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T., Chanbers, S.: Flexibility – a manufacturing conundrum. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 11(2), 5–13 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, M.S.: Component commonality in a multiple-period inventory model with service level constraints. International J. Production Research 37(12), 2665–2683 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, P.K., Wong, Y.K., Chan, F.T.S.: Integrating environmental criteria into the supplier selection process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 138, 349–356 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jans, R., Degraeve, Z., Schepens, L.: Analysis of an industrial component commonality problem. European Journal of Operational Research 186, 801–811 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ketzenberg, M.E., Souza, G.C., Guide Jr., V.D.R.: Mixed assembly and disassembly operations for remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management 12(3), 320–335 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleber, R., Minner, S., Kiesmüller, G.: A continuous time inventory model for a product recovery system with multiple options. International Journal of Production Economics 79, 121–141 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L., Tang, C.S.: Modeling the cost and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Science 43(1), 40–53 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lieckens, K., Vandaele, N.: Reverse logistics network design with stochastic lead times. Computers and Operations Research 34, 395–416 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr, N., Hughson, C., Varel, E., Bauer, R.: State-of-the-art Assessment of Remanufacturing Technology. Rochester Institute of technology, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Noci, G.: Designing green vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 3(2), 103–114 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Y.H., Hwang, H.: Deterministic inventory model for recycling system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 17, 423–428 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.: Special Customer Operations. Lucent Technologies, Private communication with the authors

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagh, J.D., Martha, C.C.: Supply Chain Postponement and Speculation Strategies: how to choose the right strategy. Journal of Business Logistics 19(2), 13–33 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Savaskan, R.C., Bhattacharya, S., Wassenhove, L.N.V.: Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science 50(2), 239–252 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J.C., Chang, Y.L., Ferguson, M.: Evaluation of postponement structures to accommodate mass customization. Journal of Operations Management 23, 305–318 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, K.G., Booker, J.D., Edmondson, N.F.: Strategies and case studies in assembly system selection. Institution of Mechanical Engineers 218(B), 675–688 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tani, K., Guner, E.: Concept of an autonomous disassembly system using behavior based robotics. Production and Operations Management 11, 187–198 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zikopoulos, C., Tagaras, G.: Impact of uncertainty in the quality of returns on the profitability of a single-period refurbishing operation. European Journal of Operational Research 182(1), 205–225 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zikopoulos, C., Tagaras, G.: On the attractiveness of sorting before disassembly in remanufacturing. IIE Transactions 40(3), 313–323 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, W., Bowersox, D.J.: Planning Physical Distribution With The Principle of Postponement. Journal of Business Logistics 9(2), 117–136 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Su, J.C.P., Lee, V. (2010). Component Commonality in Closed-Loop Supply Chain. In: Huang, G.Q., Mak, K.L., Maropoulos, P.G. (eds) Proceedings of the 6th CIRP-Sponsored International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 66. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10430-5_103

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10430-5_103

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10429-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10430-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics