Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Framed Field Experiments on Approval Voting: Lessons from the 2002 and 2007 French Presidential Elections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Approval Voting

Part of the book series: Studies in Choice and Welfare ((WELFARE))

Abstract

Competitive elections are an essential feature of representative democracies; thus, the choice of voting method is partly constitutive of the form of the democracy. Clearly, this engenders fundamental debates on the properties that acceptable voting rules should and should not exhibit. These debates take place primarily in two spheres: the public and the scientific. Let us here consider an example from France. The President of the French Republic is elected by direct universal suffrage, on the basis of a two-round plurality vote. In other words, run-off voting ensures that the elected President always obtains a majority. On each round, each voter can vote for one and only one candidate. If no candidate receives a majority of votes in the first round of voting, there is a run-off between the two highest-scoring candidates. The winner of this latter round is the winner of the election. Hence, each round is determinant for the result and considered as an important source of information on citizens’ political preferences. The results of the first round of the 2002 French presidential election were a shock for a large part of the population: contrary to the predictions of the opinion polls, the candidate for the extreme Right, Jean-Marie Le Pen, and the sitting president, Jacques Chirac, were selected for the second round. This surprise has contributed to serious public debate on the mechanisms of the two-round single-name vote. This discussion focuses in particular on the tension between tactical and sincere voting, with many citizens pleading for the adoption of a voting method which would allow better expression of their true preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alós-Ferrer, C., & Granić, Ð. G. (2010). Approval voting in Germany: description of a field experiment. In J.-F. Laslier & R. Sanver (Eds.), Handbook on approval voting (pp. 397–411). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M., & Laraki, R. (2007a). A theory of measuring, electing and ranking. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104(21), 8720–8725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M., & Laraki, R. (2007b). Election by majority judgement: experimental evidence. Cahiers du Laboratoire d’Econométrie de l’Ecole Polytechnique, no. 28, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M., & Laraki, R. (2007c). Le jugement majoritaire : l’expérience d’Orsay. Commentaire, 30(118), 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M., Laraki, R., Laslier, J.-F., & van der Straeten, K. (2003). Le vote par assentiment: une expérience. Cahiers du Laboratoire d’Econométrie de l’Ecole Polytechnique, no. 2003-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M., Laslier, J.-F., & van der Straeten, K. (2002). Compte-rendu de l’expérience de vote du 23 janvier 2002 à l’IEP. Mimeo, mars 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, G. W. Jr., & Persky, J. (1999). Robust voting. Public Choice, 99(3–4), 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baujard, A., & Igersheim, H. (2007a). Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors des élections présidentielles françaises du 22 avril 2007. Rapport au Centre d’Analyse Stratégique, décembre 2007. 289 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baujard, A., & Igersheim, H. (2007b). Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors des élections présidentielles françaises du 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats. Rapport d’étape au Centre d’Analyse Stratégique, juin 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baujard, A., & Igersheim, H. (2007c) L’expérience du vote par note. Expérimenter des modes de scrutins différents. In Organiser l’expression citoyenne. Pratiques électorales, déroulement des scrutins, technologies du vote. Un dimanche au bureau de vote. Actes du colloque du 5 avril 2007, no. 10. Rapports et documents du Centre d’Analyse Stratégique, La Documentation Française, avril 2007, pp. 48–53. 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baujard, A., & Igersheim, H. (2009). Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats. Revue Economique, 60(1), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baujard, A., Igersheim, H., & Senné, T. (2009a). Measuring consensus. An analysis based on experimental data. Mimeo CREM, Université de Caen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baujard, A., Igersheim, H., & Senné, T. (2009b). The political supply in the 2007 French presidential elections: An analysis based on experimental data. Mimeo CREM, Université de Caen; Annales d’Economie et Statistiques (Submited for publication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda, J. (1781). Mémoires sur les Élections au Scrutin. Paris: Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S., & Fishburn, P. (1983). Approval voting. Boston: Birkhaüser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, J. (1785). Essais sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic coordination in the World’s electoral system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G., & Katz, J. (2002). Elbridge gerry’s salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farvaque, E., Jayet, H., & Ragot, L. (2009). Quel mode de scrutin pour quel vainqueur ? Une expérience sur le vote préférentiel transférable. Revue d’Économie Politique, 120(2), 221–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D. S. (1989). On combining approval with disapproval voting. Behavioral Science, 34, 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehrlein, W. V., & Lepelley, D. (2003). On some limitations of the median voting rule. Public Choice, 117(1), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2008). Naturally occurring markets and exogenous laboratory experiments: a case study of the winner’s curse. Economic Journal, 118, 822–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillinger, C. (2004a). On the possibility of democracy and rational collective choice. Discussion Paper, no. 2004-21, University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillinger, C. (2004b). Utilitarian collective choice and voting. Discussion Paper, no. 2004-25, University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillinger, C. (2004c). Voting and the cardinal aggregation of judgments. Discussion Paper, no. 2004-09, University of Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillinger, C. (2005). The case for utilitarian voting. Homo Oeconomicus, 23, 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. (2004). Le vote et la règle majoritaire, analyse mathématique de la politique. CNRS-édition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. (2006). Spatial approval voting. Political analysis, 14, 160–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. (2009a). A note on comparing median evaluations in single peaked-domains. Cahier no. 2009-23, Laboratoire d’économétrie, École Polytechnique, June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. (2009b). Lessons from in situ experiments during french elections. In B. Grofman, A. Laurent & B. Dolez (Eds.), In situ and laboratory experiments on electoral law reform: french presidential elections, Heidelberg: Springer (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. (2010a). Describing the society through approval data. In J.-F. Laslier & R. Sanver, (Eds.), Handbook on approval voting (pp. 455–468). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F. (2010b). Laboratory experiments on approval voting. In J.-F. Laslier & R. Sanver (Eds.), Handbook on approval voting (pp. 339–356). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F., & Sanver, R. (2010). The basic approval voting game. In J.-F. Laslier & R. Sanver (Eds.) Handbook on approval voting (pp. 431–451). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F., & van der Straeten, K. (2004). Election présidentielle : une expérience pour un autre mode de scrutin. Revue Française de Science Politique, 54, 99–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslier, J.-F., and van der Straeten, K. (2008). Approval voting in the french 2002 presidential election: a live experiment. Experimental Economics, 11, 97–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez, M. (2010). Approval voting in a large electorate. In J.-F. Laslier & R. Sanver (Eds.) Handbook on approval voting (pp. 165–197). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CREM, University of Caen Basse-Normandie, Caen, France

    Antoinette Baujard

Authors
  1. Antoinette Baujard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herrade Igersheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoinette Baujard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Labo. d'Econometrie, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau CX, 91128, France

    Jean-François Laslier

  2. Dept. Economics, Istanbul Bilgi University, Kurtulus Deresi Cad. 47, Istanbul, 34440, Turkey

    M. Remzi Sanver

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baujard, A., Igersheim, H. (2010). Framed Field Experiments on Approval Voting: Lessons from the 2002 and 2007 French Presidential Elections. In: Laslier, JF., Sanver, M. (eds) Handbook on Approval Voting. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02838-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02839-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation