Skip to main content

Minimally Invasive Corneal Surgery

  • Chapter
  • 837 Accesses

Cornea transplantation is a fascinating surgical procedure for the many reasons to do it, as well as the many ways to do it. Cornea transplant surgeons now have the option of replacing the posterior cornea for primary and secondary endotheliopathies, as well as the anterior cornea for pathology that does not involve the endothelium. In penetrating keratoplasty (PK), full-thickness host corneal tissue is replaced with full-thickness donor corneal tissue. Erasmus Darwin, the grandfather of Charles Darwin, is given credit for his vision of restoring a scarred cornea to its transparent state [1]. His idea, proposed in 1760, led to our present corneal transplantation procedure [1].

The idea to use living corneal tissue for transplantation was suggested by Franz Reisinger in 1818 [1]. He experimented with the procedure in rabbits and chickens but was unable to achieve clear grafts [1]. Bigger reported a successful homograft procedure on a pet gazelle in 1837, and Von Hippel performed the first successful lamellar cornea transplant in 1886 when he transplanted a rabbit cornea into a human recipient bed [1]. Finally, in 1905, Zirm performed the first successful human cornea transplant [1]. The procedure has continued to evolve since then with successes due to advances in surgical instrumentation, donor tissue preservation, and anti-inflammatory agents. For example, topical Cyclosporin A (Allergan, Irvine, CA) is now available. According to an eye bank statistical report in 2002, there are approximately 33,000 PKs performed per year in the United States [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ (2005) Cornea. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carones F, Vigo L, Scandola E et al (2002) Evaluation of the prophylactic use of mitomycin-C to inhibit haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:2088–2095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Panda A, Vanathi M, Kumar A et al (2007) Corneal graft rejection. Surv of Ophthalmol 52:375–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Javadi M, Naderi M, Zare M et al (2006) Comparison of the effect of three suturing techniques on postkeratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus. Cornea 25:1029–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dada T, Aggarwal A, Vanathi M et al (2008) Post-penetrating keratoplasty glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 56:269–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E et al (2008) Collagen cross-linking with ribofl avin and ultraviolet-A light in kerato-conus: long-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg 34: 796–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donnenfeld E, Kornstein H, Amin A et al (1999) Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 106: 1966–1974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malecha MA, Holland EJ (2002) Correction of myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty with laser in situ keratomileusis. Cornea 21:564–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Niederkorn JY (2007) Immune mechanisms of corneal allograft rejection. Current Eye Res 32:1005–1016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maumenee A (1951) The infl uence of donor-recipient sensi-tization on corneal grafts. Am J Ophthalmol 34:142–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khodadoust AA, Silverstein AM (1969) Transplantation and rejection of individual cell layers of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol 8:180–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. CCTS Research Group (1992) The collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Arch Ophthalmol 110:1392–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mader T, Stulting D (1991) The high-risk penetrating ker-atoplasty. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 4:411–422

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cowden J, Copeland R, Schneider M (1989) Large diameter therapeutic penetrating keratoplasties. J Refract Corneal Surg 5:244–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cherry PMH, Pashby RC, Tadros ML et al (1979) An analysis of corneal transplantation. Ann Ophthalmol 11:461–469

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuberville AW, Foster CS, Wood TO (1983) The effect of donor cornea epithelium removal on the incidence of allograft rejection reactions. Ophthalmology 90:1351–1356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Settee R, Korean M, Anand D et al (2008) Intakes in advanced keratoconus. Cornea 27:1022–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghosh S, Jhanji E, Taylor H et al (2008) Acyclovir therapy in prevention of recurrent herpetic keratitis following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 145:198–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Branco B, Gaudio P, Margolis T 2004) Epidemiology and molecular analysis of herpes simplex keratitis requiring primary penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 88: 1285–1288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinhardt T, Kalgan C, Cetin A (1997) The infl uence of glaucoma history on graft survival after penetrating kerato-plasty. Greases Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:553–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Borderie V, Meritet J, Chaumeil C et al (2004) Cultureproven herpetic keratitis after penetrating keratoplasty in patients with no previous history of herpes disease. Cornea 23:118–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holland EJ, Schwartz GS (1999) Herpes simplex virus kera-titis classifi cation and treatment. Clinical Signs Ophthalmol 14:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldblum D, Bachmann C, Tappeiner C et al (2008) Comparison of oral antiviral therapy with valacyclovir or acyclovir after penetrating keratoplasty for herpetic keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1201–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holland EJ (2003) In post-keratoplasty patients: a safer alternative to prednisolone? Data on fi le, Bausch #x0026; Lomb pharmaceuticals

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather M. Skeens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skeens, H.M., Holland, E.J. (2010). Minimally Invasive Corneal Surgery. In: Fine, I.H., Mojon, D.S. (eds) Minimally Invasive Ophthalmic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02602-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02602-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02601-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02602-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics