Skip to main content

Selection of Imitation Strategies in Populations When to Learn or When to Replicate?

  • Conference paper
  • 1081 Accesses

Abstract

A question in the modeling of populations of imitators is if simple imitation or imitation based on learning rules can improve the fitness of the individuals. In this investigation this problem is analyzed for two kinds of imitators involved in a cooperative dilemma: One kind of imitators has a replicator heuristics, i.e. individuals which decide its new action based on actions of their neighbors, whereas a second type has a learning heuristics, i.e. individuals which use a learning rule (for short learner) in order to determine their new action. The probability that a population of learners penetrates in a population of replicators depends on a training error parameter assigned to the replicators. I show that this penetration is similar to a site percolation process which is robust to changes in the individual learning rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D.: The Evolution of Cooperation. Science 211, 1390 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawkins, R.: The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Selten, R., Ostmann, A.: Imitation Equilibrium. Homo Oeconomicus 16, 114 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breazeal, C., Buchsbaum, D., Gray, J., Gatenby, D., Blumberg, B.: Learning from and About Others: Towards Using Imitation to Bootstrap the Social Understanding of Others by Robots. Artificial Life 11, 31 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirman, A.: Ants, Rationality, and Recruitment. The Quartery Journal of Economics 108, 137 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nadeau, R., Cloutier, E., Guay, J.-H.: New Evidence About the Existence of a Bandwagon Effect in the Opinion Formation Process. International Political Science Review 14, 203 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, L., Sörensen, P.N.: Cowles foundation discussion paper NO. 1552. Yale University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henrich, J., Boyd, R.: The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences. Evolution and Human Behavior 19, 215 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chavalarias, D.: Metamimetic Games: Modeling Metadynamics in Social Cognition (2005), jass.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/2/5.html

  10. Guzmán, R.A., Rodríguez-Sickert, C., Rowthorn, R.: When in Rome, do as the Romans do: the coevolution of altruistic punishment, conformist learning, and cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, 112 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lasner, A., Ekenberg, O.: A One-Layer Feedback Artificial Neural Network With Bayesian Learning Rule. Int. J. Neural Systems 1, 77 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engel, A., van den Broeck, C.: Statististical Mechanics of Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Hebb, D.O.: The organization of Behavior. Wiley, New York (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nowak, M., May, R.M.: Evolutionary Games and Spatial Chaos. Nature 359, 826 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Galam S.: Behind the Shirts, is Symmetry (1999), physics/9901012 v1 11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bull, L., Holland, O., Blackmore, S.: On Meme-Gene Coevolution. Artificial Life 6, 227 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hauert, C.H., Schuster, H.G.: Effects of increasing the Number of Players and Memory Size in the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma: a numerical approach. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 513 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanz, A., Martin, M.: Memory boots Cooperation. Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. C 17, 841 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hauert, C.: Fundamental Clusters in Spatial 2–2 games. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 761 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Herz, A.V.M.: Collective Phenomena in Spatially Extended Evolutionary Games. J. Theor. Biol. 169, 65 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindgren, K., Nordhal, M.G.: Evolutionary dynamics of spatial games. Physica D 75, 292 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nowak, M.A., Sigmund, K.: A Strategy of Win-Stay, Lose-Shift that outperforms Tit-for-Tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Nature 364, 56 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Axelrod, R.: The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hauert, C., Stenull, O.: Simple adaptive Strategy wins the Prisoners Dilemma. J. Theor. Biol. 218, 261 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider, J.J., Kirkpatrick, S.: Stochastic optimizazion. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K.: Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Díaz Ochoa, J.G. (ed.): Diversity under Variability and extreme Variability of Environments. arXiv:0804.2898v1 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Albert, R., Barabasi, A.L.: Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 47 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Granovetter, M.: Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. The American Journal of Sociology 83, 1420 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huberman, B.: The Dynamics of Social Dilemmas. Scientific American 76 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ochoa, J.G.D. (2009). Selection of Imitation Strategies in Populations When to Learn or When to Replicate?. In: Zhou, J. (eds) Complex Sciences. Complex 2009. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02466-5_81

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02466-5_81

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02465-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02466-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics