Zusammenfassung
Unabhängig davon, wo sie arbeiten, finden es Ergotherapeuten zunehmend wichtig, das Ergebnis der Behandlung am Ende der Therapie zu messen. Der Anlass für dieses Bedürfnis sind das Engagement von Ergotherapeuten für eine hohe Behandlungsqualität, der Wunsch nach Klientenzufriedenheit und die zunehmende Forderung nach Kosteneffektivität im Gesundheitswesen.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Bosch J (1995) The reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Master’s Thesis. McMaster University, Hamilton
Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1997) Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. CAOT, Ottawa
Department of National Health and Welfare (DNHW), Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1983) Guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy (H39-33/1983 E). Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa
Department of National Health and Welfare, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1986) Intervention guidelines for the client-centred practice of occupational therapy (H39-100/1986 E). Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa
Department of National Health and Welfare, Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (1987) Towards outcome measures in occupational therapy (H39-114/1987 E). Department of National Health and Welfare, Ottawa
Fearing VG, Law M, Clark M (1997) An occupational performance process model: fostering client and therapist alliances. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 64: 7–15
Law M (1998) Client-centred occupational therapy. Slack, Thorofare/NJ
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1994a) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 2nd edn. CAOT, Toronto
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1998) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, 3rd edn. CAOT, Toronto
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell-Opzoomer A, McColl M, Polatajko H, Pollock N (1991) Canadian Occupational Performance Measure Manual. CAOT, Toronto
Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J (1995) Client-centred practice: what does it mean and does it make a difference? Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 62: 250–257
Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, Carswell A, Baptiste S, McColl M (1994b) The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: results of pilot testing. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 61: 191–197
Law M, Rosenbaum P, Russell D, Pollock N, Walter S, King G (1997) A comparison of intensive neurodevelopmental therapy plus casting and a regular occupational therapy program for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39: 664–670
Law M, Stewart D (1996) Test retest reliability of the COPM with children (unveröffentlichtes Manuskript)
MacKenzie A (1994) Differences in perceptions between older persons and their carers. Master thesis. King’s College, London
Mahurin RK, Bettignies BH, Pirozzolo FJ (1991) Structured assessment of independent living skills: preliminary report of a performance measure of functional abilities in dementia. Journal Gerontol 46: 58–66
McColl M, Patterson M, Law M (1997) Validation of the COPM for community practice. Queen’s University, Kingston
Michalos A (1980) Satisfaction and happiness. Social Indicators Research 8: 385–422
Mirkopolous C, Butler K (1994) Quality assurance: clients’ perceptions of goal performance and satisfaction. 11th World Congress of Occupational Therapy, London
Reed K, Sanderson SR (1980) Concepts in occupational therapy. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Rogers C (1939) The clinical treatment of the problem child. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston/MA
Sanford J, Law M, Swanson L, Guyatt G (1994) Assessing clinically important change as an outcome of rehabilitation in older adults. Conference of the American Society of Aging, San Francisco/CA
Scull D (1997) An outcome measure for adult mental health: an evaluation study of the COPM for adult mental health. Undergraduate honours thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff
Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A (1995) The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 62: 242–249
Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre, Boston/MA
Waters D (1995) Recovering from a depressive episode using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 62: 278–282
Wilcox A (1994) A study of verbal guidance for children with developmental coordination disorder. Unpublished master thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.
Wood-Dauphinee S, Opzoomer A, Williams JI, Marchand BB, Spitzer WO (1988) Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69: 583–590
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Law, M., Polatajko, H., Carswell, A., McColl, M.A., Pollock, N., Baptiste, S. (2009). Das kanadische Modell der „occupational performance“ und das „Canadian Occupational Performance Measure“. In: Konzeptionelle Modelle für die ergotherapeutische Praxis. Ergotherapie — Reflexion und Analyse. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89771-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89771-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89770-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89771-2