Skip to main content

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 22))

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

Objectives: Implantation of bare metal stents has therapeutic limitations, such as the permanent nature and the thrombogenicity. This has lead to the development of bioabsorbable polymer stents. With regard to the material, the stent design is a highly important factor for mechanical performance. Hence, in this study we examined the influence of the stent design on the mechanical properties of the entire stent. Materials/Methods: Three different designs were created as two dimensional stent outer shells with the CAD software Pro/Engineer Wildfire 3.0, Parametric Technology Corporation, Needham, USA. The stent outer shell was the basis for the three dimensional modeling with the preprocessor Patran, MSC Software Corporation, Santa Ana, CA, USA. For the nonlinear finite-element-analysis stent expansion, recoil and the pressure of the vessel were defined in separate load cases. Abaqus, Dassault Systemes, Providence, RI, USA, was used as processor and postprocessor. Three designs with the most promising results in terms of mechanical properties were used for manufacturing prototypes were investigated regarding recoil and radial strength. Stents were with from polymer tubes of a poly-(L-lactid) based polymer blend with an inner diameter of 1.4 mm and a wall thickness of 0.15 mm, for prototype manufacturing. Results: In the finite-element-analysis the recoil of Design A, B and C was 2.18%, 4.26%, and 2.82% and the collapse pressure was 0.81 bar, 0.66 bar, and 0.52 bar, respectively. In vitro testing yielded recoil values for Design A, B and C of: 2.09±0.11%, 2.14±0.25%, and 2.15±0.21%. The collapse pressure was 0.40±0.03 bar, 0.34±0.06 bar, and 0.44±0.04 bar, respectively. Conclusion: The differences of the results may be found in the elasto-plastic defined material properties. In next steps the finite-element-model will be further improved as a tool to reduce the need for experimental investigations during the development of polymer stents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. (2002) A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med 346:1773–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. (2003) Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349:1315–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heublein B, Rohde R, Kaese V, et al. (2003) Biocorrosion of magnesium alloys: a new principle in cardiovascular implant technology? Heart 89:651–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peuster M, Wohlsein P, Brugmann M, et al. (2001) A novel approach to temporary stenting: degradable cardiovascular stents produced from corrodible metal-results 6–18 months after implantation into New Zealand white rabbits. Heart 86:563–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stack RS, Califf RM, Phillips HR, et al. (1988) Interventional cardiac catheterization at Duke Medical Center. Am J Cardiol 62:3F–24F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo A, Karvouni E. (2000) Biodegradable stents: “fulfilling the mission and stepping away”. Circulation 102:371–373

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tamai H, Igaki K, Kyo E, et al. (2000) Initial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans. Circulation 102:399–404

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ormiston JA, Webster MW, Armstrong G. (2007) First-in-human implantation of a fully bioabsorbable drug-eluting stent: the BVS poly-L-lactic acid everolimus-eluting coronary stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 69:128–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanimoto S, Serruys PW, Thuesen L, et al. (2007) Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and the everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent: insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Venkatraman S, Poh TL, Vinalia T, et al. (2003) Collapse pressures of biodegradable stents. Biomaterials 24:2105–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Venkatraman SS, Tan LP, Joso JF, et al. (2006) Biodegradable stents with elastic memory. Biomaterials 27:1573–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vogt F, Stein A, Rettemeier G, et al. (2004) Long-term assessment of a novel biodegradable paclitaxel-eluting coronary polylactide stent. Eur Heart J 25:1330–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zilberman M, Eberhart RC. (2006) Drug-eluting bioresorbable stents for various applications. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 8:153–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zilberman M, Nelson KD, Eberhart RC. (2005) Mechanical properties and in vitro degradation of bioresorbable fibers and expandable fiber-based stents. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 74:792–799

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bunger CM, Grabow N, Sternberg K, et al. (2007) A biodegradable stent based on poly(L-lactide) and poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) for peripheral vascular application: preliminary experience in the pig. J Endovasc Ther 14:725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bunger CM, Grabow N, Sternberg K, et al. (2007) Sirolimus-eluting biodegradable poly-L-lactide stent for peripheral vascular application: a preliminary study in porcine carotid arteries. J Surg Res 139:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grabow N, Bunger CM, Schultze C, et al. (2007) A biodegradable slotted tube stent based on poly(L-lactide) and poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) for rapid balloon-expansion. Ann Biomed Eng 35:2031–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt W Schmitz KP. A guide to excellence. In Mastering of Endovascular Techniques. Edited by Lanzer P: Lippincott William & Wilkins; Philadelphia 2006: 114–135

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Schultze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schultze, C., Grabow, N., Martin, H., Schmitz, KP. (2009). Finite-element-analysis and in vitro study of bioabsorbable polymer stent designs. In: Vander Sloten, J., Verdonck, P., Nyssen, M., Haueisen, J. (eds) 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_520

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_520

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89207-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89208-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics