Skip to main content

Strategic Characterization of the Index of an Equilibrium

  • Conference paper
Book cover Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4997))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We prove that an equilibrium of a nondegenerate bimatrix game has index + 1 if and only if it can be made the unique equilibrium of an extended game with additional strategies of one player. The main tool is the “dual construction”. A simplicial polytope, dual to the common best-response polytope of one player, has its facets subdivided into best-response regions, so that equilibria are completely labeled points on the surface of that polytope. That surface has dimension m − 1 for an m×n game, which is much lower than the dimension m + n of the polytopes that are classically used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bárány, I., Vempala, S., Vetta, A.: Nash equilibria in random games. In: Proc. 46th FOCS, pp. 123–131 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, X., Deng, X.: Settling the complexity of 2-player Nash-equilibrium. In: Proc. 47th FOCS, pp. 261–272 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conitzer, V., Sandholm, T.: Complexity results about Nash equilibria. In: Proc. 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 765–771 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demichelis, S., Germano, F.: On the indices of zeros of Nash fields. Journal of Economic Theory 94, 192–217 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilboa, I., Zemel, E.: Nash and correlated equilibria: some complexity considerations. Games and Economic Behavior 1, 80–93 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Govindan, S., Wilson, R.: Uniqueness of the index for Nash equilibria of two-player games. Economic Theory 10, 541–549 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hofbauer, J.: Some thoughts on sustainable/learnable equilibria. In: 15th Italian Meeting on Game Theory and Applications, Urbino, Italy, July 9–12 (2003) (accessed on October 29, 2007), http://www.econ.uniurb.it/imgta/PlenaryLecture/Hofbauer.pdf

  8. Johnson, C.R., Olesky, D.D., van den Driessche, P.: Matrix classes that generate all matrices with positive determinant. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 25, 285–294 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemke, C.E., Howson Jr., J.T.: Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 12, 413–423 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Myerson, R.B.: Sustainable equilibria in culturally familiar games. In: Albers, W., et al. (eds.) Understanding Strategic Interaction: Essays in Honor of Reinhard Selten, pp. 111–121. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Papadimitriou, C.H.: On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 48, 498–532 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Savani, R., von Stengel, B.: Exponentially many steps for finding a Nash equilibrium in a bimatrix game. In: Proc. 45th FOCS, pp. 258–267 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shapley, L.S.: A note on the Lemke–Howson algorithm. Mathematical Programming Study 1: Pivoting and Extensions, pp. 175–189 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. von Schemde, A.: Index and Stability in Bimatrix Games. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 1853. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. von Stengel, B.: Computing equilibria for two-person games. In: Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 3, pp. 1723–1759. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ziegler, G.M.: Lectures on Polytopes. Springer, New York (1995)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

von Schemde, A., von Stengel, B. (2008). Strategic Characterization of the Index of an Equilibrium. In: Monien, B., Schroeder, UP. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79308-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79309-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics