This chapter studies the effects of an increase in the price of an intermediate input on economic growth of a small open economy. Most of the analysis employs a nonscale growth model, although for comparative purposes we also briefly consider a simple endogenous growth model. The economy has access to a perfect world capital market, a consequence of which is that the equilibrium growth rates of consumption and output can diverge indefinitely. Both models imply that following an oil shock consumption level, although its subsequent growth rate remains unaffected. But the two models yield sharply contrasting implications for the growth rate of capital and ouput. The nonscale growth model implies that the effects on the growth rate are only temporary. Eventually, the growth rate of capital and output recovers back to its initial balanced growth rate, although output, capital, and consumption are all permanently lower. In the case of the endogenous growth model, there are no transitional dynamics; a permanent increase in the price of the imported input leads to a permanent constant reduction in the growth rate of capital and output.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bardhan P, Lewis S (1970) Models of growth with imported inputs. Economica 37:373–385
Barro RJ (1997) Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Barro RJ (2003) Determinants of economic growth in a panel of countries. Ann Econ Finance 4:231–274
Barsky RB, Kilian L (2004) Oil and the macroeconomy since 1970s. J Econ Perspect 18:115–134
Bean CR (1986) The terms of trade, labour supply and the current account. Econ J 96:38–46
Becker T, Mauro P (2006) Output drops and the shocks that matter. IMF Working Paper No. 06/172
Bhandari JS, Turnovsky SJ (1984) Materials price increases and aggregate adjustment in an open economy. Eur Econ Rev 25:151–182
Bruno M, Sachs J (1982a) Energy and resource allocation: a dynamic model of the Dutch disease. Rev Econ Stud 49:845–859
Bruno M, Sachs J (1982b) Input price shocks and the slowdown in economic growth: the case of UK manufacturing. Rev Econ Stud 49:679–705
Corden WM (1975) A framework for analyzing the implications of the rise in oil prices. In: Rybczynski T (ed) The economics of the oil crisis. Holmes and Meier, New York
Eicher TS, Schubert SF, Turnovsky SJ (2008) Dynamic effects of terms of trade shocks: the impact on debt and growth. J Int Money Finance
Eicher TS, Turnovsky SJ (1999) International capital markets and non-scale growth. Rev Int Econ 7:171–188
Findlay R, Rodriguez AC (1977) Intermediate imports and macroeconomic policy under flexible exchange rates. Can J Econ 10:208–217
Golub S (1983) Oil prices and exchange rates. Econ J 93:576–593
Grounder R, Bartleet M (2007) Oil price shocks and economic growth: evidence for New Zealand, 1989–2006. NZ Association of economists, Christchurch
Harberger AC (1950) Currency depreciation, income, and the balance of trade. J Polit Econ 58: 47–60
Hayashi F (1982) Tobin's marginal q, average q: a neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50:213–224
Huang KXD, Meng Q (2007) The Harberger—Laursen—Metzler effect under capital market imperfections. J Int Money Finance 26:1001–1015
Ikeda S (2001) Weakly non-separable preferences and the Harberger—Laursen—Metzler effect. Can J Econ 34:290–307
Jones CI (1995a) R & D based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103:759–784
Jones CI (1995b) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Q J Econ 110:495–527
Kandil M (2006) On the transmission of exchange rate fluctuations to the macroeconomy: contrasting evidence for developing and developed countries. J Int Trade Econ Dev 15:101–127
Kose MA (2002) Explaining business cycles in small open economies: how much do world prices matter?. J Int Econ 56:299–327
Krugman P (1983) Oil and the dollar. In: Bhandari J, Putnam B (eds) Economic interdependence and flexible exchange rates, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Laursen S, Metzler LA (1950) Flexible exchange rates and the theory of employment. Rev Econ Stat 32:281–299
Marion N (1984) Nontraded goods, oil price increases and the current account. J Int Econ 16:29–44
Marion N, Svensson LEO (1984) Adjustments to expected and unexpected oil price changes. Can J Econ 17:15–31
Matsuyama K (1988) Terms-of-trade, factor intensities and the current account in a life-cycle model. Rev Econ Stud 55:247–262
Mendoza EG (1995) The terms of trade, the real exchange rate, and economic fluctuations. Int Econ Rev 36:101–137
Obstfeld M (1980) Intermediate imports, the terms of trade and the dynamics of the current account. J Int Econ 10:461–480
Obstfeld M (1982) Aggregate spending and the terms of trade: Is there a Laursen—Metzler effect? Q J Econ 97:251–270
Otto G (2003) Terms of trade shocks and the balance of trade: there is a Harberger—Laursen— Metzler effect. J Int Money Finance 22:155–184
Persson T, Svensson LEO (1985) Current account dynamics and the terms of trade: Harberger— Laursen—Metzler two generations later. J Polit Econ 93:43–65
Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94:1002–1038
Sachs J (1983) Energy and growth under flexible exchange rates. In: Bhandari J, Putnam B (eds) Economic interdependence and flexible exchange rates, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Sachs J, Cooper RN, Fischer S (1981) The current account and macroeconomic adjustment in the 1970s. Brookings Papers Econ Activity 1:201–268
Schubert SF, Turnovsky SJ (2002) The dynamics of temporary policies in a small open economy. Rev Int Econ 10:604–622
Sen P (1991) Imported input price and the current account in an optimizing model without capital mobility. J Econ Dyn Control 15:91–101
Sen P, Turnovsky SJ (1989) Deterioration of the terms of trade and capital accumulation: a re-examination of the Laursen—Metzler effect. J Int Econ 26:227–250
Serven L (1999) Terms-of-trade shocks and optimal investment: another look at the Laursen— Metzler effect. J Int Money Finance 18:337–365
Svensson LEO (1984) Oil prices, welfare and the trade balance. Q J Econ 99:649–672
Svensson LEO, Razin A (1983) The terms of trade and the current account: The Harberger— Laursen—Metzler effect. J Polit Econ 91:97–125
Turnovsky SJ (1996) Fiscal policy, growth, and macroeconomic performance in a small open economy. J Int Econ 40:41–66
Turnovsky SJ, Chattopadhyay P (2003) Volatility and growth in developing economies: some numerical results and empirical evidence. J Int Econ 59:267–295
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schubert, S.F., Turnovsky, S.J. (2009). Imported Inputs: Dynamic Effects on Economic Growth. In: Kamihigashi, T., Zhao, L. (eds) International Trade and Economic Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78676-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78676-4_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78675-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78676-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)