Skip to main content

Artificial DMUs and Contingent Weight Restrictions for the Analysis of Brazilian Retail Banks Efficiency

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 2007))

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the BCC-I model in Data Envelopment Analysis comparing results of Artificial DMUs and the adjusted Contingent Weight Restrictions approach in the analysis of Brazilian Retail Banks efficiencies. The number of employees, fixed assets, leverage and delinquency rate were considered as inputs, and the financial intermediation results and the equities profitability as outputs. While the Contingent Weight Restrictions method makes only directed weight restrictions, Artificial DMUs method simulates a set of weight restrictions and depends on the use of specialists’ opinions. The compared methods are relevant to increase the precision of the market analysis. The results of both methods are compared in order to distinguish their advantages and inconveniences. A set of efficient banks is obtained together with a market analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R., et al. (1997), Weight restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions. Annals of Operations Research, 73:13–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Charnes, A., et al. (1994), Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and application. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dyson, R. G., et al. (2001), Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132:245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pastor, J. T. (1997) Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis: a generalization. Annals of Operation Research, 73:91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedraja-Chaparro, F., Salinas-Jimenez, J., Smith, P. (1997), On the role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analyis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8:215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roll, Y., Golany, B. (1991), Controlling factor weights in DEA. IIE Transaction, 23(1):2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thanassoulis, A., Allen, R. (1998), Simulating Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis by Means of Unobserved DMUs Management Science, 44:586–594, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Diallo, M., de Souza, M.V.P., Guedes, L.E., Souza, R.C. (2008). Artificial DMUs and Contingent Weight Restrictions for the Analysis of Brazilian Retail Banks Efficiency. In: Kalcsics, J., Nickel, S. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 2007. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 2007. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77903-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics