Skip to main content

Enhancing UML Extensions with Operational Semantics.

Behaviored Profiles with Templates

  • Conference paper
Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4735))

Abstract

The objective of the ongoing OMG standard about a foundational UML subset semantics (fUML) is twofold: providing operational semantics for a UML subset, and ease unambiguous and automatic model exploitations. Its impact could however be limited if usual UML profiling practices do not evolve. Profiles are the traditional way to specialize UML semantics and handle semantic variation points. However, they are usually defined in a way that only informally addresses the semantic issue, potentially limiting the benefits that fUML could bring in UML based methodologies. UML profiling practices must evolve: we propose to explicitly encapsulate operational semantics into stereotype operations, and provide a way to intuitively handle semantic variation points through template parameters. We illustrate the usage of these mechanisms and demonstrate their potential benefits. We also show that no UML metamodel modifications are required to support them, so that their implementation in L3-compliant UML tools is straightforward.

This work has been performed in the context of the Usine Logicielle project (www.usine-logicielle.org) of the System@tic Paris Region Cluster. This project is partially funded by the ”Direction Générale des Entreprises of the French administration”, the ”Conseil Régional d’Île de France”, the ”Conseil Général des Yvelines”, the ”Conseil Général de l’Essonne” and the ”Conseil Général des Hauts de Seine”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cuccuru, A., Mraidha, C., Terrier, F., Gérard, S.: Templateable Metomodels for Semantic Variation Points. In: ECMDA-FA. European Conference on Model Driven Architecture - Foundations and Applications, Haifa, Israel (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. O’Keefe, G.: Improving the Definition of UML. In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design patterns: Abstraction and reuse of object-oriented design. In: Nierstrasz, O. (ed.) ECOOP 1993. LNCS, vol. 707, pp. 406–431. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunter, C.: Semantics of Programming Languages: Structures and Techniques (Foundations of Computing). MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Meaningful Modeling: What’s the Semantics of ”Semantics”? Computer 37(10), 64–72 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henderson-Sellers, B.: UML - the Good, the Bad or the Ugly? Perspectives from a panel of experts. Software and System Modeling 4(1), 4–13 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hussey, K.: What do YOU want UML to be? (Slides). In: EclipseCON, Santa Clara, CA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, S.-K., Burger, D., Carrington, D.A.: An MDA Approach towards Integrating Formal and Informal Modeling Languages. In: Fitzgerald, J.A., Hayes, I.J., Tarlecki, A. (eds.) FM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3582, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. OMG. Semantics of a Foundational Subset for Executable UML Models RFP (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. OMG. Unified Modeling Language: Infrastructure (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OMG. Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure version 2.1.1 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rasch, H., Wehrheim, H.: Checking Consistency in UML Diagrams: Classes and State Machines. In: Najm, E., Nestmann, U., Stevens, P. (eds.) FMOODS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2884, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanguy, Y., Gérard, S., Radermacher, A., Terrier, F.: Model Driven Engineering for Real Time Embedded Systems. In: ERTS. 3rd European Congress Embedded Real Time Software, Toulouse (France) (January 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tessier, P., Gérard, S., Mraidha, C., Terrier, F., Geib, J.-M.: A Component-Based Methodology for Embedded System Prototyping. In: 14th IEEE International Workshop on Rapid Systems Prototyping, San Diego, CA, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gregor Engels Bill Opdyke Douglas C. Schmidt Frank Weil

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cuccuru, A., Mraidha, C., Terrier, F., Gérard, S. (2007). Enhancing UML Extensions with Operational Semantics.. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4735. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75208-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75209-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics