Abstract
Finding the right pricing for music downloads is of ample importance to the recording industry and music download service providers. For the recently introduced music downloads, reference prices are still developing and to find a revenue maximizing pricing scheme is a challenging task. The most commonly used approach is to employ linear pricing (e.g., iTunes, musicload). Lately, subscription models have emerged, offering their customers unlimited access to streaming music for a monthly fee (e.g., Napster, RealNetworks). However, other pricing strategies could also be used, such as quantity rebates starting at certain download volumes.
Research has been done in this field and Buxmann et al. (2005) have shown that price cuts can improve revenue. In this paper we apply different approaches to estimate consumer’s willingness to pay (WTP) for music downloads and compare our findings with the pricing strategies currently used in the market.
To make informed decisions about pricing, knowledge about the consumer’s WTP is essential. Three approaches based on adaptive conjoint analysis to estimate the WTP for bundles of music downloads are compared. Two of the approaches are based on a status-quo product (at market price and alternatively at an individually self-stated price), the third approach uses a linear model assuming a fixed utility per title. All three methods seem to be robust and deliver reasonable estimations of the respondent’s WTPs. However, all but the linear model need an externally set price for the status-quo product which can introduce a bias.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BAMERT, T., MEIER-BICKEL, T.S. and RÜDT, C. (2005): Pricing Music Downloads: A Conjoint Study, Proceedings of the 2005 European Academy of Management Annual Conference.
BUXMANN, P., POHL, G., JOHNSCHER, P. and STRUBE, J. (2005): Strategien für den digitalen Musikmarkt — Preissetzung und Effektivität von Maßnahmen gegen Raubkopien. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 47,2, 118–125.
GREEN, P.E., KRIEGER, A.M. and AGARWAL, M.K. (1991): Adaptive Conjoint Analysis: Some Caveats and Suggestions. Journal of Marketing Research, 28,2.
IFPI (2006): IFPI:06 Digital Music Report. 266/http://www.ifpi.org/sitecontent/library/digital-music-report-2006.pdf.
JEDIDI, K. and ZHANG, Z.J. (2002): Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price. Management Science, 48,10.
JOHNSON, R.M. (1991): Comment on “Adaptive Conjoint Analysis: Come Caveats and Suggestions”. Journal of Marketing Research, 28,2.
JUPITER RESEARCH (2003): Pricing Music Downloads: Online Music’s Volume-Driven Future, Concept Report, Jupiter Research, January 30, 2003.
JUPITER RESEARCH (2006): European Digital Music Value Chain, Vision Report, Jupiter Research, February 1, 2006.
KOHLI, R. and MAHAJAN, V. (1991): A Reservation-Price Model for Optimal Pricing of Multiattribute Products in Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 28,3, 347–354.
ORME, B. (2002): Formulating Attributes and Levels in Conjoint Analysis. Technical report, Sawtooth Software Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Breidert, C., Hahsler, M. (2007). Adaptive Conjoint Analysis for Pricing Music Downloads. In: Decker, R., Lenz, H.J. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70981-7_46
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70980-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70981-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)