Abstract
Dealing with multiple models for process assessment and improvement is a challenging, time-consuming task. In the automotive sector, for example, several suppliers drive their process improvement on the basis of CMMI®. However, many car manufacturers require process capability ratings determined on the basis of Automotive SPICETM. The approach presented aims at preparing organizations already working according to CMMI for Automotive SPICE assessments. The approach was already successfully applied in industrial settings and lessons learned are discussed. The approach helps to avoid misunderstandings during assessments due to different model taxonomy, achieve appropriate process ratings, and save both effort and costs.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE™ Process Assessment Model (PAM), RELEASE v2.3 (May 5, 2007)
Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE™ Process Reference Model (PRM), RELEASE v4.3 (May 5, 2007)
Dorling, A.: CMMi Mapping to ISO/IEC TR 15504-2:1998 (last visited February 3, 2008), http://www.isospice.com/articles/33/1/CMMi-Mapping-to-ISOIEC-TR-15504-21998/Page1.html
Paulk, M., Weber, C., Garcia, S., Chrissis, M., Bush, M.: Key practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-025, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1993)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 12207:1995/Amd.2:2004(E): Information technology - Software life cycle processes. Amendment 2. Genf (2004)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 15288:2002(E): Systems engineering - System life cycle processes. Genf (2002)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 15504-2:2003(E): Information Technology - Process assessment - Part 2: Performing an assessment. Geneve (2003)
International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 15504-5:2006(E): Information technology - Process assessment - Part 5: An exemplar process assessment model. Genf (2006)
Rout, T.P., El Emam, K., Fusani, M., Goldenson, D., Jung, H.: SPICE in retrospect: Developing a standard for process assessment. J. Syst. Softw. 80(9), 1483–1493 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.045
Sassenburg, H., Kitson, D.: A Comparative Analysis of CMMI and Automotive SPICE. European SEPG, Amsterdam/Netherlands (June 2006)
Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.2 (November 2007)
Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Development, Version 1.2 (August 2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bella, F., Hörmann, K., Vanamali, B. (2008). From CMMI to SPICE – Experiences on How to Survive a SPICE Assessment Having Already Implemented CMMI. In: Jedlitschka, A., Salo, O. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5089. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69564-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69566-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)