Skip to main content

Copyright Conflicts Resolution: A Method Based on Legal Ontologies in an Architecture Enabling Subsidiarity

  • Conference paper
On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: OTM 2003 Workshops (OTM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2889))

  • 469 Accesses

Abstract

Legal and technical regulations both serve to allow a wide dissemination of creative works through networks. Technological measures and rights management information implement copyright ‘contracts’ and are based on Rights Expression Languages, i.e. ontologies that link copyright concepts and terms to events occurring in digital networks.

While implementing such devices, specific attention shall be dedicated to the compatibility between different stakeholders’ expectations. In order for Digital Rights Management systems to be fair, they must adequately support opposing interests; notwithstanding and in all cases the law requires that copyright exceptions granted by national legislations be respected.

After a description of the legal framework and current technical standardization initiatives, we will detail a method for obtaining ontologies from syntactical parsing of copyright law legal texts. This ontology will be supported by a client-server architecture capable of resolving conflicting rights expressions including the use of the principle of subsidiarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bench-Capon, T.: Task Neutral Ontologies, Common Sense Ontologies and Legal Information Systems. In: Second International Workshop on Legal Ontologies, JURIX 2001, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourigault, D., Lame, G.: Analyse distributionnelle et structuration de terminologie - Application à la construction d’une ontologie documentaire du Droit, Revue Traitement Automatique des Langues, 43–1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiariglione, L.: Digital Media Project (2003), http://www.chiariglione.org

  4. Delgado, J., Gallero, I.: Standardisation of the management of Intellectual Property Rights in multimedia content. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Web Delivery of Music, pp. 125–132. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. de Rosnay, M.D.: Digital Right Management systems toward European law: between copyright protection and access control. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Delivering of Music, Darmstadt, December 9-11, pp. 117–124. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dussolier, S.: Fair use by design in the European Directive of 2001: an empty promise. In: 12th Conference on Computers, Freedom and Privacy (2002), http://www.cfp2002.org/fairuse/dusollier.pdf

  7. Gruber, T.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. In: Knowledge Acquisition, pp. 199–220 (May 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lame, G.: Using text analysis techniques to identify legal ontologies components. In: ICAIL 2003, Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web Based Legal Information Management,

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lessig, L.: Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Basic Books, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lessig, L.: The future of Ideas, The Fate of Commons in a Connected World. Random House (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Litman, J.: Revising Copyright Law for the Information Age, 75 Oregon Law Review 19 (1996), http://www.law.cornell.edu/commentary/intelpro/litrvtxt.htm

  12. Mulligan, D., Burstein, A.: Implementing Copyright Limitations in Rights Expression Languages. In: 2002 ACM Workshop on Digital Rights Management (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berne: Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886), http://www.wipo.int/clea/docs/en/wo/wo001fr.htm

  14. Directive, Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, OJ L 167 22.06.2001 p. 10 (2001), http://www.europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/index.html

  15. US Copyright Law. Copyright Law of the United States, http://www.copyright.gov/title17/index.html

  16. DMCA, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (1998), http://www.loc.gov/copyright/legislation/dmca.pdf

  17. WCT, WIPO Copyright Treaty, World Intellectual Property Organization, 20/12/1996 (1996), http://www.wipo.org/eng/diplconf/distrib/94dc.htm

  18. WPPT, WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, World Intellectual Property Organization, 20/12/1996 (1996), http://www.wipo.org/eng/diplconf/distrib/95dc.htm

  19. MPEG, http://www.mpeg.telecomitalia.com

  20. MPEG-21, http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/index.htm

  21. MPEG-21 N4518. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 N4518, From MPEG-1 to MPEG-21: creating an interoperable multimedia infrastructure, http://mpeg.nist.gov/

  22. OASIS, http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php

  23. Open Mobile Alliance, http://www.openmobilealliance.org/

  24. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee, http://ltsc.ieee.org/

  25. Internet Streaming Media Alliance, http://www.isma.tv/home

  26. Indecs, http://www.indecs.org/pdf/framework.pdf

  27. Imprimatur project, http://www.imprimatur.net

  28. ODRL, http://odrl.net/

  29. IPR System, http://www.iprsystems.com

  30. XrML, http://www.xrml.org/

  31. Content Guard, http://www.contentguard.com

  32. IPROnto, http://dmag.upf.es/ontologies/ipronto/index.html

  33. DMAG (Distributed Multimedia Applications Group), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain, http://dmag.upf.es

  34. Creative Commons, http://www.creativecommons.org/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Rosnay, M.D. (2003). Copyright Conflicts Resolution: A Method Based on Legal Ontologies in an Architecture Enabling Subsidiarity. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: OTM 2003 Workshops. OTM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2889. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39962-9_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39962-9_66

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-20494-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-39962-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics