Skip to main content

A Proposal for a Semantic Web Service Description Format

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3250))

Abstract

Automatic evaluation and consumption of Web services requires a comprehensive semantic information model of a Web service. One example of a language that facilitates capability-driven description of services is OWL-S. However, it imposes two limitations: (1) it offers no native support for the description of certain rule types often needed for service description and (2) it leads to very large service description documents that are difficult to read and write. In this paper, we propose an XML-based markup format that addresses these problems and allows for semantic annotation of Web services of different technical flavors. This work is inspired by OWL-S, however it makes certain design decisions aimed to increase the ease of use of semantic Web service descriptions, by presenting a significantly more compact syntax for service markup and grounding. Furthermore, the proposed description format provides support for non-deterministic service operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W3C: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) version 1.2 (2002), http://www.w3.org/tr/2003/wd-wsdl12-20030303/

  2. The OWL-S Coalition: OWL Web Services V1.0 (2004), http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/

  3. Fensel, D., Bussler, C.: The Web Service Modeling Framework WSMF. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 1 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: Feature synopsis for OWL Lite and OWL (2001), http://www.w3.org/tr/owl-features/

  5. Sabou, M., Richards, D., van Splunter, S.: An experience report on using DAMLS. In: The Proceedings of the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference Workshop on E-Services and the Semantic Web (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: Reasoning in description logics. In: Brewka, G. (ed.) Principles of Knowledge Representation, pp. 191–236. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Copi, I.M., Cohen, C.: Introduction To Logic, 11th edn. Dark Alley (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer, B.: Deduction based software component retrieval (Phd Theses, University of Passau) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language - Combining OWL and RuleML (2004), http://www.daml.org/rules/proposal/

  10. McDermott, D.: DRS: A Set of Conventions for Representing Logical Languages in RDF (2004), http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/drsguide.pdf

  11. Ankolekar, A., Huch, F., Sycara, K.: Concurrent Execution Semantics of DAMLS with Subtypes. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 318–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. W3C: Resource Description Framework, RDF (2002), http://www.w3.org/rdf/

  13. Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., Irvine, U., Masinter, L., Corporation, X.: Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax (1998), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.tx

  14. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (May 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ghallab, M., Howe, A., Knoblock, C., McDermott, D., Ram, A., Veloso, M., Weld, D., Wilkins, D.: PDDL– the planning domain definition language (1998), http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/ghallab98pddl.html

  16. McDermott, D., Dou, D.: Representing Disjunction and Quantifiers in RDF. In: Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McDermott, D.: Estimated-Regression Planning for Interactions with Web Services. In: Proc. of the AI Planning Systems Conference 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bertoli, P., Cimatti, A., Lago, U.D., Pistore, M.: Extending PDDL to nondeterminism, limited sensing and iterative conditional plans. In: ICAPS 2003, Workshop on PDDL (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peer, J., Vukovic, M. (2004). A Proposal for a Semantic Web Service Description Format. In: Zhang, LJ.(., Jeckle, M. (eds) Web Services. ECOWS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3250. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30209-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30209-4_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23202-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30209-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics