Skip to main content

Software Process Improvement in Small and Medium Sized Software Enterprises in Eastern Finland: A State-of-the-Practice Study

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3281))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Software Process Improvement (SPI) has been proven to increase product and service quality as organizations apply it to achieve their business objectives. Improvement needs of small organizations are same as larger organizations, i.e. they want to achieve better results in software projects, product quality, and customer satisfaction and put an end to the project overruns and failures. However the resources of the small company for SPI-work are often limited and external support seems to be essential. Companies are lacking experience and knowledge how to define and implement appropriate improvement plans and actions. The paper presents current results of software process assessment and improvement work done at University of Joensuu in cooperation with small and medium-sized software companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, P., Ramachandran, M., Abushama, H.: PRISMS: an Approach to Software Process Improvement for Small to Medium Enterprises. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference On Quality Software, Dallas, Texas, November 6-7 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brodman, J., Johnson, D.: Tailoring the CMM for Small Businessess, Small Organizations, and Small Projects. Software Process Newsletter (8) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cater-Steel, A.: Process Improvement in Four Small Software Companies. In: Proceedings of 13th Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2001), Canberra, Australia, August 27-28 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. CMMI for Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Integrated Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing (CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS) Version 1.1, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diaz, M., Sligo, J.: How Software Process Improvement Helped Motorola. IEEE Software 14(5), 75–81 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dybå, T.: Factors of Software Process Improvement Success in Small and Large Organizations: an Empirical Study in the Scandinavian Context. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Software Engineering Conference held jointly with 10th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 148–157 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. El Emam, K., Briand, L.: Cost and Benefits of Software Process Improvement. Technical Report ISERN-97-12, International Software Engineering Research Network (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herbsleb, J., Carleton, A., Rozum, J., Siegel, J., Zubrow, D.: Benefits of CMM based Software Process Improvement: Initial Results. Technical Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-13, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofer, C.: Software Development in Austria: Results of an Empirical Study among Small and Very Small Enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 28 th Euromicro Conference (EUROMICRO 2002), Dortmund, Germany, September 4-6, pp. 361–366 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horvat, R., Rozman, I., Györkös, J.: Managing the Complexity of SPI in Small Companies. Software Process Improvement and Practice 5(1), 45–54 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. IEEE Software November/December 2003: The State of the Practice, vol. 20(6) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/IEC IS 15504-2: Software Engineering - Process Assessment - Part 2: Performing An Assessment (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO/IEC TR 15504-1: Information Technology - Software Process Assesment - Part 1: A Concepts and Introductory Guide. International Organisation for Standardisation (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO/IEC TR 15504-5: Information Technology - Software process assessment - Part 5: An assessment model and indicator guidance. International Organisation for Standardisation (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kautz, K.: Software Process Improvement in Very Small Enterprises? Does it pay off? Journal of Software Process - Improvement and Practice, Special Issue on Organizational Change through Software Process Improvement 4(4), 209–226 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelly, D., Culleton, B.: Process Improvement for Small Organizations. IEEE Computer 32(10), 41–47 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krasner, H.: Accumulating the Body of Evidence for The Payoff of Software Process Improvement (1997), http://www.utexas.edu/coe/sqi/archive/krasner/spi.pdf (accessed 12.7.2004)

  18. Kuvaja, P., Similä, J., Krzanik, L., Bicego, A., Koch, G., Saukkonen, S.: Software Process Assessment and Improvement, The BOOTSTRAP Approach. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. The KYKY model, Software Technology Transfer Finland, http://www.sttf.fi/ (unpublished)

  20. Laryd, A., Orci, T.: Dynamic CMM for Small Organizations. In: Proceedings of the 1st Argentine Symposium on Software Engineering (ASSE 2000), pp. 133–149 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moitra, D.: Managing Change for Software Process Improvement Initiatives: a Practical Experience-Based Approach. Software Process Improvement and Practice 4(4), 199–207 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rainer, A., Hall, T.: Key Success Factors for Implementing Software Process Improvement: A Maturity-Based Analysis. Journal of Systems and Software 67(2), 71–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Saukkonen, S., Oivo, M.: Teollinen ohjelmistoprosessi: Ohjelmistoprosessin parantaminen SIPI-menetelmällä. Helsinki, TEKES (1998) (in finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  24. SPICE assessment forms: Finnish Software Measurement Association network, http://www.fisma.org/ (unpublished)

  25. tSoft-project: University of Joensuu, Finland, http://cs.joensuu.fi/tSoft/ (in finnish)

  26. Stelzer, D., Mellis, W.: Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice 4(4), 227–250 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Saastamoinen, I., Tukiainen, M. (2004). Software Process Improvement in Small and Medium Sized Software Enterprises in Eastern Finland: A State-of-the-Practice Study. In: Dingsøyr, T. (eds) Software Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3281. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30181-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30181-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23725-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30181-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics