Skip to main content

Towards an Automated Model of Comprehension (AMoC)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11082))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Reading is a complex cognitive process wherein learners acquire new information and consolidate their knowledge. Readers create a mental representation for a given text by processing relevant words that, along with prior inferred concepts, become activated and establish meaningful associations. Our automated model of comprehension (AMoC) uses an automated approach for simulating the ways in which learners read and conceptualize by considering both text-based information consisting of syntactic dependencies, as well as inferred concepts from semantic models. AMoC makes use of cutting edge Natural Language Processing techniques, transcends beyond existing models, and represents a novel alternative for modeling how learners potentially conceptualize read information. This study presents side-by-side comparisons of the results generated by our model versus the ones generated by the Landscape model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kintsch, W., Welsch, D.M.: The Construction-Integration Model: A Framework for Studying Memory for Text, p. 21. Institute of Cognitive Science, Boulder (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., Linderholm, T.: The landscape model of reading. In: van Oostendorp, H., Goldman, S.R. (eds.) The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading, pp. 71–98. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. McNamara, D.S., Magliano, J.: Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 51, 297–384 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dascalu, M., Dessus, P., Bianco, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Nardy, A.: Mining texts, learner productions and strategies with ReaderBench. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (ed.) Educational Data Mining. SCI, vol. 524, pp. 345–377. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02738-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Trausan-Matu, S., Stahl, G., Sarmiento, J.: Polyphonic support for collaborative learning. In: Dimitriadis, Y.A., Zigurs, I., Gómez-Sánchez, E. (eds.) CRIWG 2006. LNCS, vol. 4154, pp. 132–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11853862_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Landauer, T.K., Dumais, S.T.: A solution to Plato’s problem: the latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychol. Rev. 104(2), 211–240 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representation in vector space. In: Workshop at ICLR, Scottsdale (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manning, C.D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S.J., McClosky, D.: The Stanford CoreNLP Natural Language Processing toolkit. In: 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp. 55–60. ACL, Baltimore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The PageRank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Britton, B.K., Graesser, A.C.: Models of understanding text. In: Britton, B.K., Graesser, A.C. (eds.) Models of Understanding Text. Psychology Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work presented in this paper was funded by the European Funds of Regional Development with the Operation Productivity Program 2014–2020 Priority Axe 1, Action 1.2.1 D-2015, “Innovative Technology Hub based on Semantic Models and High Performance Computing” Contract no. 6/1 09/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihai Dascalu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dascalu, M., Paraschiv, I.C., McNamara, D.S., Trausan-Matu, S. (2018). Towards an Automated Model of Comprehension (AMoC). In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds) Lifelong Technology-Enhanced Learning. EC-TEL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11082. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98571-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98572-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics