Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyses and compares the relationship between the resources available and the enforcement policies used by occupational health and safety (OHS) institutions, and the political mechanisms to distribute these for enforcement activities. This chapter concludes that justice is expensive and that austerity policies leading to the erosion of funds needed for regulatory enforcement activities have caused a decriminalisation of OHS crime and, hence, injustice and inequality. This chapter also raises fundamental questions on whether enforcement institutions should be provided with enough resources to fulfil a constitutional obligation to achieve their statutory goals, such is the case in Italy, or whether these fundamental constitutional principles should not guarantee enforcement institutions' mandates, such is the case in Britain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is useful to note here that resources can be a relative concept, i.e. they are not infinite and enforcement institutions can always put more resources to good use.

  2. 2.

    It is important to note that informal enforcement involves those actions concluding in informal or personal advice, while formal enforcement is when officers issue improvement or prohibition notices and prosecution. However, at the time of the interviews in England notices did not require firms to pay penalty fines. The only time when firms might have been penalised, either with fines or through employer imprisonment, is when firms were taken to court for prosecution. This has now changed with Fees For Intervention. Improvement and prohibition notices represent the formalisation of informal requests. Hence, until the Fees For Intervention was introduced the primary enforcement threat of prosecution to firms was when they were refusing to comply with improvement or prohibition notices, which a very rare occurrence.

  3. 3.

    In a different context, one of the respondents argued that some counties register no notices in a whole year, which is very difficult to happen because, according to another respondent, in 99% of workplaces there are improvements to be made.

  4. 4.

    Italian expression meaning ‘to be exhausted’.

  5. 5.

    ISPESL, Superior Institute for Prevention and Work Safety, was founded as the Italian research centre for health and safety hazards and its practices were meant to offer information, expertise and support to health and safety inspectors. ISPESL was shut down in 2010 and responsibilities transferred to INAIL . The amount of help that ISPESL was offering to enforcement officers was criticised also in other interviews .

  6. 6.

    Legal Decree 626 1994 (Repubblica Italiana 1994), which in 2008 was replaced by Legal Decree 81 2008, was the first regulation to introduce the goal setting philosophy in the health and safety Italian law in the same way the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 did in England.

  7. 7.

    According to a Ministry of Health report, in the regions where the research study was conducted funding increased by 33% between 2001 and 2009, most of it (17.8%) between 2007 and 2008 (Ministero della Salute 2004, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Canciani .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Canciani, D. (2019). Enforcement Resources. In: The Politics and Practice of Occupational Health and Safety Law Enforcement. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98509-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98509-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98508-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98509-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics