Small-World Network and Knowledge Sharing

Yu, Yu; Chen, Yao; Shi, Qinfen

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77926-3_9

Yu Yu⁷,
Yao Chen^7,8 &
Qinfen Shi⁹

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 271))

657 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is a two-way communication process, and the compact degree and frequency of knowledge exchange are both different due to the individual cognitive background of organization members. The mutual learning and communication among members can promote continuous sharing and enhance the organization’s overall knowledge level by sharing and expanding more benefits of the knowledge receiver. During communication and understanding, a knowledge dialogue is accrued, and there is a complex interactive relationship between individuals or populations, thus forming a relative network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

eBook: USD 16.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Softcover Book: USD 99.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 129.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Abdullateef, E. (2000). Developing knowledge and creativity: Asset tracking as a strategy centerpiece. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 30(3), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632920009597311.
Article Google Scholar
Abernathy, W. J., & Chakravarthy, B. S. (1979). Government intervention and innovation in industry: A policy framework. Sloan Management Review, 20(3), 3–18.
Google Scholar
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (1999). Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature, 401, 130. https://doi.org/10.1038/43601.
Article Google Scholar
Ali, E. A., Halit, K., Hayat, A., & Zeki, O. (2017). Knowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: A multiple case study in Turkey. Kybernetes, 46(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2016-0081.
Article Google Scholar
Allee, V. (1997). The knowledge evolution: Expanding organizational intelligence. Newton: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Google Scholar
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i-171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360.
Article Google Scholar
Alton, C. (2003). Knowledge sharing: A game people play. ASLIB Proceedings, 55(3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530310472615.
Article Google Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., & Ottino, J. M. (2004). Complex networks. The European Physical Journal B, 38(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00110-5.
Article Google Scholar
Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(21), 11149–11152. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200327197.
Article Google Scholar
Ambos, T. C., Ambos, B., Eich, K. J., & Puck, J. (2016). Imbalance and isolation: How team configurations affect global knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 22(4), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.03.005.
Article Google Scholar
Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.
Article Google Scholar
Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., & Lavoie, F. F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 27(5), 306–318.
Article Google Scholar
Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2006). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865–1883.
Article Google Scholar
Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(00)00010-0.
Article Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, S., & Pathak, P. (2007). Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects — A game theoretic analysis. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.006.
Article Google Scholar
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
Article Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Article Google Scholar
Barrat, A., & Weigt, M. (2000). On the properties of small-world network models. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 13(3), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050067.
Article Google Scholar
Beerepoot, M., & Beerepoot, N. (2007). Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4812–4825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.015.
Article Google Scholar
Bell, G. G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955–972.
Article Google Scholar
Bernard, A., & Tichkiewitch, S. (2008). Methods and tools for effective knowledge life-cycle-management. Berlin: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160915.
Article Google Scholar
Bhargava, S. C., Kumar, A., & Mukherjee, A. (1993). A stochastic cellular automata model of innovation diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 44(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90008-U.
Article Google Scholar
Birkinshaw, J., & Sheehan, T. (2002). Managing the knowledge life cycle. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 75–83.
Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 47–69.
Article Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229–247.
Article Google Scholar
Bower, D. J. (1993). Successful joint ventures in science parks. Long Range Planning, 26(6), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90213-Y.
Article Google Scholar
Brenda, K., Yajiong, X., & Yongjun, L. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 22(5/6), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0042.
Article Google Scholar
Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(5), 337–338.
Article Google Scholar
Bui, H. T. (2017). Big five personality traits and job satisfaction. Journal of General Management, 42(3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307016687990.
Article Google Scholar
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020.
Article Google Scholar
Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614.
Article Google Scholar
Cai, G., & Kock, N. (2009). An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 821–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.021.
Article Google Scholar
Carayol, N., & Roux, P. (2009). Knowledge flows and the geography of networks: A strategic model of small world formation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.005.
Article Google Scholar
Carlucci, D., Marr, B., & Schiuma, G. (2004). The knowledge value chain: How intellectual capital impacts on business performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(6–7), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2004.004903.
Article Google Scholar
Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: Influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262781.
Article Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1943a). The description of personality. I. Foundations of trait measurement. Psychological Review, 50(6), 559–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057276.
Article Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1943b). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(4), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116.
Article Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1417576.
Article Google Scholar
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800090303.
Article Google Scholar
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
Article Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Kao, C., & Zhu, J. (2013). Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.021.
Article Google Scholar
Cheng, J. H., Yeh, C. H., & Tu, C. W. (2008). Trust and knowledge sharing in green supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810882170.
Article Google Scholar
Chong, C. W., Teh, P.-L., & Tan, B. C. (2014). Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: Do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter? Educational Studies, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.825577.
Article Google Scholar
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
Article Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.
Article Google Scholar
Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Bi, G., & Yang, F. (2010). Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.006.
Article Google Scholar
Cooke, P., Kaufmann, D., Levin, C., & Wilson, R. (2006). The biosciences knowledge value chain and comparative incubation models. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5025-3.
Article Google Scholar
Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007701304281.
Article Google Scholar
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. New York: Springer US.
Google Scholar
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer US.
Chapter Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Google Scholar
Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8), 1557–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002.
Article Google Scholar
Cress, U., & Martin, S. (2006). Knowledge sharing and rewards: A game-theoretical perspective. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500112.
Article Google Scholar
Cyr, S., & Choo, C. W. (2010). The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 824–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011087832.
Article Google Scholar
de Moor, M. H. M., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Krueger, R. F., de Geus, E. J. C., Toshiko, T., et al. (2012). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for personality. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.128.
Article Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610370159.
Article Google Scholar
DiCesare, F., Harhalakis, G., Proth, J.-M., Silva, M., & Vernadat, F. (1993). Practice of petri nets in manufacturing. Dordrecht: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Diez, J. R. (2000). The importance of public research institutes in innovative networks-empirical results from the metropolitan innovation systems Barcelona, Stockholm and Vienna. European Planning Studies, 8(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666418.
Article Google Scholar
Ding, Z., Ng, F., & Li, J. (2014). A parallel multiple mediator model of knowledge sharing in architectural design project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.004.
Article Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1998). Harvard business review on knowledge management. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (2006). The practice of management (Reissue ed.). New York: Harper Business.
Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490905.
Article Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2004). When to ally and when to acquire. Harvard Business Review, 82(7–8), 108–115.
Google Scholar
Eustace, C. (2003). A new perspective on the knowledge value chain. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 588–596.
Article Google Scholar
Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1985). A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87(4), 594–604.
Article Google Scholar
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6.
Article Google Scholar
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9.
Article Google Scholar
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.
Article Google Scholar
Franić, S., Borsboom, D., Dolan, C. V., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). The big five personality traits: Psychological entities or statistical constructs? Behavior Genetics, 44(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9625-7.
Article Google Scholar
French, J. W. (1953). The description of personality measurements in terms of rotated factors. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Google Scholar
Fuentes, M. A., & Kuperman, M. N. (1999). Cellular automata and epidemiological models with spatial dependence. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 267(3–4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00027-8.
Article Google Scholar
Gagné, M. (2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20298.
Article Google Scholar
Ghobadi, S. (2015). What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: A literature review and classification framework. Information Management, 52(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.10.008.
Article Google Scholar
Ghobadi, S., & D’Ambra, J. (2013). Modeling high-quality knowledge sharing in cross-functional software development teams. Information Processing & Management, 49(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.07.001.
Article Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. California: Sage Publications.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger, J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.
Article Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.
Article Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110.
Article Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437.
Article Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208.
Article Google Scholar
Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1), 102–115.
Article Google Scholar
Guan, J., & Wang, J. (2004). Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency. Scientometrics, 59(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000013303.25298.ae.
Article Google Scholar
Guan, J., & Zuo, K. (2014). A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency. Scientometrics, 100(2), 541–575.
Article Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships1This paper has benefited from the insightful comments and suggestions of Andy Brod and Kathy Combs.1. Research Policy, 29(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6.
Article Google Scholar
Harari, M. B., Jain, N. K., & Joseph, T. (2014). The five-factor model of personality and knowledge transfer in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12086.
Article Google Scholar
Hau, Y. S., Kim, B., Lee, H., & Kim, Y.-G. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009.
Article Google Scholar
Heintze, N. (1995). Control-flow analysis and type systems. In A. Mycroft (Ed.), Static analysis. SAS 1995. lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 983). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Holsapple, C. W., & Singh, M. (2001). The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness. Expert Systems with Applications, 20(1), 77–98.
Article Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355.
Article Google Scholar
Hsu, B.-F., Wu, W.-L., & Yeh, R.-S. (2011). Team personality composition, affective ties and knowledge sharing: A team-level analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(2–4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2011.038597.
Article Google Scholar
Hu, J., Guan, Y., & Fan, X. (2010). The innovation efficiency of industry-University- Research Cooperation based on DEA. In 2010 3rd international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, 26–28 Nov. 2010 (Vol. 3, pp. 345–348), Kunming, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2010.403 .
Huang, C.-C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003.
Article Google Scholar
Huang, X., He, P., & Zhang, W. (2016). A cooperative differential game of transboundary industrial pollution between two regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.095.
Article Google Scholar
Hung, S.-Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H.-M., & Lin, W.-M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(6), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.02.004.
Article Google Scholar
Inzelt, A. (2004). The evolution of university–industry–government relationships during transition. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.002.
Article Google Scholar
Jadin, T., Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2013). Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.007.
Article Google Scholar
Jafari Navimipour, N., & Charband, Y. (2016). Knowledge sharing mechanisms and techniques in project teams: Literature review, classification, and current trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.003.
Article Google Scholar
Janssen, O., Lam, C. K., & Huang, X. (2010). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The moderating roles of distributive justice and positive affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.614.
Article Google Scholar
Jensen, K. (1994). An introduction to the theoretical aspects of coloured petri nets. New York: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Johnes, J., & Yu, L. (2008). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Economic Review, 19(4), 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.08.004.
Article Google Scholar
Jørgensen, S., & Zaccour, G. (2004). A brief tutorial on differential games. In S. Jørgensen & G. Zaccour (Eds.), Differential games in marketing. Boston: Springer.
Chapter Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the big five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837.
Article Google Scholar
Kalling, T. (2003). Organization-internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: A qualitative case study. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.170.
Article Google Scholar
Kao, C. (2014). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis with slacks-based measures. Omega, 45, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.12.002.
Article Google Scholar
Kari, J. (2005). Theory of cellular automata: A survey. Theoretical Computer Science, 334(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2004.11.021.
Article Google Scholar
Kari, J. (2012). Basic concepts of cellular automata. In G. Rozenberg, T. Bäck, & J. N. Kok (Eds.), Handbook of natural computing. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Keeling, M. J. (1999). The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1421), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0716.
Article Google Scholar
Kleinberg, J. M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406, 845. https://doi.org/10.1038/35022643.
Article Google Scholar
Kleingeld, A., van Mierlo, H., & Arends, L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024315.
Article Google Scholar
Koessler, F. (2004). Strategic knowledge sharing in Bayesian games. Games and Economic Behavior, 48(2), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.002.
Article Google Scholar
Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2010). New forms of strategic research collaboration between firms and universities in the German research system. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(1–2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijttc.2010.029427.
Article Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Scheer, L., Jan-Benedict, E. M., & Steenkamp. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152110.
Article Google Scholar
Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Cheung, F. M. (2003). Prediction of performance facets using specific personality traits in the Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00021-0.
Article Google Scholar
Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2010). Process and product innovation: A differential game approach to product life cycle. International Journal of Economic Theory, 6(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7363.2010.00132.x.
Article Google Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290.
Article Google Scholar
Leavitt, H. J., & Bahrami, H. (1989). Managerial psychology: Managing behavior in organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Lee, C. C., & Yang, J. (2000). Knowledge value chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783–794.
Article Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6.
Article Google Scholar
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Boston: Springer US.
Chapter Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136.
Article Google Scholar
Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers & Operations Research, 31(9), 1365–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00095-9.
Article Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—Industry—Government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.5.279.
Article Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Guoping, Z. (2001). University—Industry—Government relations in China. Industry and Higher Education, 15(3), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000001101295632.
Article Google Scholar
Li, Y.-M., & Jhang-Li, J.-H. (2010). Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: A game theoretic analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1052–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.033.
Article Google Scholar
Li, D., Ma, J., Tian, Z., & Zhu, H. (2015). An evolutionary game for the diffusion of rumor in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 433, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.03.080.
Article Google Scholar
Lin, M., & Li, N. (2010). Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(3), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.10.004.
Article Google Scholar
Liu, B. (2011). Study on performance of industry-university cooperation based on DEA. In 2011 international conference on business management and electronic information, 13–15 May 2011 (Vol. 4, pp. 168–171), Guangzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBMEI.2011.5920944
Liu, Y., & Phillips, J. S. (2011). Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.002.
Article Google Scholar
Liu, D., Kumar, S., & Mookerjee, V. S. (2012). Advertising strategies in electronic retailing: A differential games approach. Information Systems Research, 23(3-part-2), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0377.
Article Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., Smith, K. J., Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall College Div.
Google Scholar
Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294590.
Article Google Scholar
Lu, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Strategic challenges for creating knowledge-based innovation in China: Transforming triple helix university-government-industry relations. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770810851476.
Article Google Scholar
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Pub Ltd.
Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2007). The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25526452.
Article Google Scholar
Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C.-F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.11.003.
Article Google Scholar
Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.06.004.
Article Google Scholar
Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., von Krogh, G., & Mueller, J. (2011). Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.540156.
Article Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507.
Article Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217.
Article Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: Neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(83)90146-0.
Article Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-Commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81.
Article Google Scholar
Merton, R. C. (2013). Innovation risk: How to make smarter decisions. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 48–56.
Google Scholar
Metcalfe, M. (2005). Knowledge sharing, complex environments and small-worlds. Human Systems Management, 24(3), 185–195.
Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67.
Google Scholar
Minbaeva, D. B. (2008). HRM practices affecting extrinsic and intrinsic motivation of knowledge receivers and their effect on intra-MNC knowledge transfer. International Business Review, 17(6), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.08.001.
Article Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.
Article Google Scholar
Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606073424.
Article Google Scholar
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research:The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172742.
Article Google Scholar
Mu, J., Peng, G., & Love, E. (2008). Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810884273.
Article Google Scholar
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J. (2000). Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101(3), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026485807148.
Article Google Scholar
Nierstrasz, O. M. (1985). Message flow analysis. In D. C. Tsichritzis (Ed.), Office automation. topics in information systems. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer.
Google Scholar
Nigg, J. T., John, O. P., Blaskey, L. G., Huang-Pollock, C. L., Willcutt, E. G., Hinshaw, S. P., et al. (2002). Big five dimensions and ADHD symptoms: Links between personality traits and clinical symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.451.
Article Google Scholar
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.
Article Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow - A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Google Scholar
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291.
Article Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1968). Energy flow in ecosystems: A historical review. American Zoologist, 8(1), 11–18.
Article Google Scholar
OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar
OECD. (2011). Public Research Institutions: Mapping sector trends. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Google Scholar
Olaisen, J., & Revang, O. (2017). The dynamics of intellectual property rights for trust, knowledge sharing and innovation in project teams. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.012.
Article Google Scholar
O’leary-kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.2307/256673.
Article Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.
Article Google Scholar
Pavitt, K. (1976). Government policies towards innovation: A review of empirical findings. Omega, 4(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(76)90005-0.
Article Google Scholar
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x.
Article Google Scholar
Picazo-Vela, S., Chou, S. Y., Melcher, A. J., & Pearson, J. M. (2010). Why provide an online review? An extended theory of planned behavior and the role of big-five personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.005.
Article Google Scholar
Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information Management, 50(4), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002.
Article Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (2015). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Book Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 926–929.
Google Scholar
Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of University–Industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.10.
Article Google Scholar
Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0223.
Article Google Scholar
Rahm, D., Kirkland, J., & Bozeman, B. (2000). University-Industry R&D Collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Netherlands: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Reisig, W. (1985). Petri nets: An introduction. New York: Springer.
Book Google Scholar
Richard, J., & Wayne, W. (2009). Using agent based simulation and game theory analysis to study knowledge flow in organizations: The KMscape. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 5(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2009010102.
Article Google Scholar
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2014). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Rosendaal, B., & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2015). Knowledge sharing within teams: Enabling and constraining factors. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.45.
Article Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
Article Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F. (1993). Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9), 1133–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600907.
Article Google Scholar
Salimifard, K., & Wright, M. (2001). Petri net-based modelling of workflow systems: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 134(3), 664–676.
Article Google Scholar
Samaddar, S., & Kadiyala, S. S. (2006). An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.024.
Article Google Scholar
Samieh, H. M., & Wahba, K. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior from game theory and socio-psychology perspectives. In 40th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 3-6 Jan. 2007 (pp. 187c–187c). Big Island: University of Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.319.
Chapter Google Scholar
Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8.
Article Google Scholar
Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm’s trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817287.
Article Google Scholar
Savolainen, R. (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.007.
Article Google Scholar
Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The big five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 966–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966.
Article Google Scholar
Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757.
Article Google Scholar
Seiford, L. M., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). Recent developments in DEA. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U.
Article Google Scholar
Selten, R. (1983). Evolutionary stability in extensive two-person games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 5(3), 269–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(83)90012-4.
Article Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007.
Article Google Scholar
Shi, Y., & Guan, J. (2016). Small-world network effects on innovation: Evidences from nanotechnology patenting. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(11), 329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3637-1.
Article Google Scholar
Shih, M.-H., Tsai, H.-T., Wu, C.-C., & Lu, C.-H. (2006). A holistic knowledge sharing framework in high-tech firms: Game and co-opetition perspectives. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2006.010272.
Article Google Scholar
Shim, J. (2010). The relationship between workplace incivility and the intention to share knowledge: The moderating effects of collaborative climate and personality traits. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Google Scholar
Sikhar, B., Gaurav, A., Zhang, W. J., Biswajit, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2012). A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.158.
Article Google Scholar
Silva, M., & Teruel, E. (1997). Petri nets for the design and operation of manufacturing systems. European Journal of Control, 3(3), 182–199.
Article Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852.
Article Google Scholar
Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5.
Article Google Scholar
Smith, J. M., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246(5427), 15–18.
Article Google Scholar
Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002.
Article Google Scholar
Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718.
Article Google Scholar
Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065725.
Article Google Scholar
Suzuki, J., Tsukada, N., & Goto, A. (2015). Role of Public Research Institutes in Japan’s National Innovation System: Case study of AIST, RIKEN and JAXA. Science, Technology and Society, 20(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815579793.
Article Google Scholar
Swink, M. (2006). Building collaborative innovation capability. Research-Technology Management, 49(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2006.11657367.
Article Google Scholar
Tang, C., & Naumann, S. E. (2015). Team diversity, mood, and team creativity: The role of team knowledge sharing in Chinese R&D teams. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(3), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.43.
Article Google Scholar
Taylor, P. D., & Jonker, L. B. (1978). Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9.
Article Google Scholar
Teh, P.-L., Yong, C.-C., Chong, C.-W., & Yew, S.-Y. (2011). Do the big five personality factors affect knowledge sharing behaviour? A study of Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 47–62.
Google Scholar
Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. (2009). Knowledge transfer in MNCs: Examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledge sourcing impact individual centrality and performance. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.02.001.
Article Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.
Article Google Scholar
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.
Article Google Scholar
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243–252.
Article Google Scholar
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225–251.
Article Google Scholar
Uzzi, B., Amaral, L. A. N., & Reed-Tsochas, F. (2007). Small-world networks and management science research: A review. European Management Review, 4(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500078.
Article Google Scholar
van der Aalst, W. M. (1998). The application of petri nets to workflow management. Journal of circuits, systems, and computers, 8(01), 21–66.
Article Google Scholar
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303039001001.
Article Google Scholar
Vincent, T. L. (1985). Evolutionary games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 46(4), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939163.
Article Google Scholar
von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Rechsteiner, L. (2012). Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: A review and framework. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 240–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00978.x.
Article Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2012). Knowledge integration in collaborative innovation and a self-organizing model. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(02), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622012400093.
Article Google Scholar
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2005). The knowledge value chain: A pragmatic knowledge implementation network. Handbook of Business Strategy, 6(1), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/08944310510558115.
Article Google Scholar
Wang, C.-C., & Yang, Y.-J. (2007). Personality and intention to share knowledge: An empirical study of scientists in an R&D laboratory. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(10), 1427–1436. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.10.1427.
Article Google Scholar
Watts, D. J. (2004). The “new” science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342.
Article Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.
Article Google Scholar
Wei, J., Liu, L., & Francesco, C. A. (2010). A cognitive model of intra-organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture. International Journal of Information Management, 30(3), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.08.007.
Article Google Scholar
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
Wolf, D. E. (1999). Cellular automata for traffic simulations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 263(1), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00536-6.
Article Google Scholar
Wolfram, S. (1984). Universality and complexity in cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 10(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(84)90245-8.
Article Google Scholar
Xu, Y., & Bernard, A. (2010). Knowledge value chain: An effective tool to measure knowledge value. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(11), 957–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2010.500677.
Article Google Scholar
Yao, W., Chen, J., & Si, Y. (2011). Research on the knowledge creation process of the university-industry collaboration: A case from China. African Journal of Business Management, 5(32), 12586–12597.
Google Scholar
Yao, W., Han, X., & Li, Y. (2015). Cross-organizational knowledge creation theory from the perspective of I-Ching: Case study in Chinese aerospace industry. Chinese Management Studies, 9(4), 528–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2015-0162.
Article Google Scholar
Yu, Y., Hao, J.-X., Dong, X.-Y., & Khalifa, M. (2013). A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.005.
Article Google Scholar
Zhao, R., Zhou, X., Han, J., & Liu, C. (2016). For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.008.
Article Google Scholar
Zhu, J. (2009). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. New York: Springer US.
Book Google Scholar
Zhu, Y.-Q. (2016). Solving knowledge sharing disparity: The role of team identification, organizational identification, and in-group bias. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.003.
Article Google Scholar
Zhuge, H. (2002a). A knowledge flow model for peer-to-peer team knowledge sharing and management. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(1), 23–30. Pii s0957-4174(02)00024-62391016/s0957-4174(02)00024-6.
Article Google Scholar
Zhuge, H. (2002b). A knowledge grid model and platform for global knowledge sharing. Expert Systems with Applications, 22(4), 313–320.
Article Google Scholar
Zhuge, H. (2004). The knowledge grid (Vol. 2012). Hackensack: World Scientific.
Book Google Scholar
Zohar, D. (1995). The justice perspective of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(5), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160508.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

College of Auditing and Evaluation, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Yu Yu & Yao Chen
Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
Yao Chen
Suzhou University of Science & Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Qinfen Shi

Authors

Yu Yu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yao Chen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qinfen Shi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yu, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, Q. (2018). Small-World Network and Knowledge Sharing. In: Strategy and Performance of Knowledge Flow. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 271. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77926-3_9

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77926-3_9
Published: 25 April 2018
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77925-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77926-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics