Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Cyber Resilience of Systems and Networks pp 381–401Cite as

Internet of Things

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Risk, Systems and Decisions ((RSD))

Abstract

This chapter addresses cyber-physical systems resilience with a focus on Internet of Things as a particularly prominent example of large-scale cyber-physical systems. The emphasis is on current and future network architectures and systems, highlighting main research issues, as well as technological trends. This chapter opens by discussing and contrasting resilience of organisation and resilience of communications and computing technologies. It then proceeds to explore issues of resilience in two use cases. One deals with smart cities, a particular application scenario of IoT, and another with large-scale networks. This chapter points out that the Internet of Things is evolving towards an Internet of Everything, where everybody and everything are connected to provide multiple services within various contexts such as smart home, wearables, smart city, smart grid, industrial internet, connected car, connected health, smart retail, smart supply chain, and smart farming. In the context of this evolution, a number of challenges must be addressed, most of which touch on issues of resilience, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cybenko, metrics for cyber resilience.

References

  • Abreu, D. P., Velasquez, K., Curado, M., & Monteiro, E. (2017). A resilient internet of things architecture for smart cities. Annals of Telecommunications, 72, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0530-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, C. C., Ashish, N., & Sheth, A. (2013). The internet of things: A survey from the data-centric perspective. In C. Aggarwal (Ed.), Managing and Mining Sensor Data. Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, K., & Michael, K. (2013). Connected: To everyone and everything (guest editorial: Special section on sensors). IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1–18, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, K. (2009). That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFiD Journal, 22, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barata, J., & Cunha, P. R. (2016). Mobile supply chain management: Moving where? In Proceedings of the 13th European, Mediterranean and middle eastern conference on information systems (EMCIS) (pp. 1–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barata, J., Cunha, P. R., & Abrantes, L. (2015). Dealing with risks and workarounds: A guiding framework. In The practice of enterprise modeling. Lecture notes in business information processing 235 (Vol. 235, pp. 141–155).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, K. E., Han, Q., Kim, K., Nguyen, P., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2016). Resilient overlays for IoT-based community infrastructure communications. 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), Berlin, pp. 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTDI.2015.40

  • Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Natarajan, P., & Zhu, J. (2014). Big data and internet of things: A roadmap for smart environments. In Fog computing: A platform for internet of things and analytics (pp. 169–186). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7 isbn= 978-3-319-05029-4, url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. ELSEVIER Computer Communications Journal, 54(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettel, M., & Friederichsen, N. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An industry 4.0 perspective. International Journal Mechanical Aerospace, Industrial Mechatronic Manufacturing Engineering, 8(1), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capela, N., & Sargento, S. (2015). An intelligent and optimized multihoming approach in real and heterogeneous environments. Wireless Networks, 21(6), 1935–1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caralli, R. A., Allen, J. H., & White, D. W. (2010). CERT resilience management model: A maturity model for managing operational resilience (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, E. B., Allen, C. R., Hatfield, K., Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Woods, D. D., & Linkov, I. (2017). Features of resilience. Environmental System Decision, 37(1), 46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan, R., Orlowska, M. E. & Li, X.(2007). RFID data management: Challenges and opportunities. 2007 IEEE International Conference on RFID, Grapevine, TX, pp. 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/RFID.2007.346166

  • Diaz, M., Martin, C., & Rubio, B. (2016). State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of internet of things and cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 67, 99–117. ISSN 1084-8045, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., Hao, F., Mukherjee, S., Lakshman, T. V., & Kompella, R. (2013). Towards an elastic distributed SDN controller. In ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review (Vol. 43(4), pp. 7–12). ACM New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • FI-WARE. (n.d.). Future internet core platform. http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/99929_en.html; https://www.fiware.org/

  • Gaddour, O., & Koubâa, A. (2012). RPL in a nutshell: A survey. ELSEVIER Computer Networks Journal, 56(14), 3163–3178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B.. (2016). Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, pp. 3928–3937. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488

  • Ignatiadis, I., & Nandhakumar, J. (2007). The impact of enterprise systems on organizational resilience. Journal of Information Technology, 22(1), 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immich, R., Cerqueira, E., & Curado, M. (2016). Shielding video streaming against packet losses over VANETs. Wireless Networks, 22(8), 2563–2577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jammal, M., et al. (2014). Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges. ELSEVIER Computer Communications Journal, 72(29), 74–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (2009). Risk management and the strategy execution system. Balanced Scorecard Representative, 11(6), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koponen, T., Casado, M., Gude, N., Stribling, J., Poutievski, L., Zhu, M., & Shenker, S. (2010). Onix: A distributed control platform for large-scale production networks. In OSDI (Vol. 10, pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyh, C., Bley, K., & Schäffer, T. (2016). Digitization of German enterprises in the production sector – Do they know how ‘digitized’ they are? In Americas conference on information systems - AMCIS 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems - AMCIS 2016, San Diego, USA, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyh C., Schäffer T., Bley K., Forstenhäusler S. (2017). Assessing the IT and Software Landscapes of Industry 4.0-Enterprises: The Maturity Model SIMMI 4.0. In E. Ziemba (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Vol 277. Information Technology for Management: New Ideas and Real Solutions. AITM 2016, ISM 2016. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 589–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, M., Wang, P., & Chu, C.-H. (2013). Data management for internet of things: Challenges, approaches and opportunities. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference IEEE cyber, physical and social computing. green computing communications (GreenCom) IEEE internet things (iThings/CPSCom) (pp. 1144–1151). Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallak, L. (1998). Putting organizational resilience to work. Industrial Management, 40(6), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. In Technical report. McKinsey Global Institute. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies

  • Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of Cloud computing. NIST Special Publication 800–145, 1(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithas, S., Tafti, A., & Mitchell, W. (2013). How a Firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 511–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. I. of S., & T. NIST. (2010). Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative. 2010. SP 800-37 Rev. 1. Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems: A Security Life Cycle Approach. Technical Report. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øgland, P. (2008). Resilience as a goal for quality management systems design. Systemist, 30(2), 247–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Seager, T. P., & Rao, P. S. C. (2011). Lessons in risk- versus resilience-based design and management. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7(3), 396–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R. J. (2007). Challenges to information systems: Time to change. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 193–195.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, M., & Dascalu, A. (2011). Considerations on integrating risk and quality management. In Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, fascicle I (pp. 49–54).

    Google Scholar 

  • Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., & Krcmar, H. (2017). A competency model for ‘Industrie 4.0’ employees. In 13th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switzerland, pp. 46–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, A., Cerqueira, E., Curado, M., & Monteiro, E. (2016). A two-tier adaptive data aggregation approach for M2M group-communication. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(3), 823–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riolli, L., & Savicki, V. (2003). Information system organizational resilience. Omega, 31(3), 227–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Integrated business continuity and disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilience. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 261–273.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Senna, C., Batista, D. M., & Milton, A. (2011). Experiments with a self-management system for virtual networks. In II Workshop de Pesquisa Experimental Da Internet Do Futuro (WPEIF). Campo Grande.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart, W. (1939). Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. Washington, DC: Graduate School, Department of Agriculture.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., et al. (2011). Network resilience: A systematic approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(7), 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, B., Pentikousis, K., & Curado, M. (2014). MeTHODICAL: Towards the next generation of multihomed application. Computer Networks, 65, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tootoonchian, A., & Ganjali, Y. (2010). HyperFlow: A distributed control plane for OpenFlow. In Proceedings of the 2010 internet network management conference on Research on enterprise networking (INM/WREN'10). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, pp. 3–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Meulen, R. (2014). Gartner says personal worlds and the internet of everything are colliding to create new markets. Gartner. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2621015

  • Vaquero, L. M., & Rodero-Merino, L. (2014). Finding your way in the fog: Towards a comprehensive definition of fog computing. SIGCOMM Comput. The Communication Review, 44(5), 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, K., Abreu, D. P., Curado, M., & Monteiro, E. (2017a). Service placement for latency reduction in the internet of things. Annals of Telecommunications, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0524-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, K., Perez Abreu, D., Gonçalves, D., Bittencourty, L., Curado, M., Monteiro, E., & Madeira, E. (2017b). Service orchestration in fog environments. In IEEE 5th international conference on future internet of things and cloud (pp. 21–23). Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F., Liu S., Liu P., Bai Y. (2006) Bridging physical and virtual worlds: Complex event processing for RFID data streams. In Y. Ioannidis et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3896. Advances in Database Technology - EDBT 2006. EDBT 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanella, A., et al. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Zhang, S., Chen, X., & Huo, X. (2010). Cloud computing research and development trend. In Second international conference on future networks, Sanya (pp. 93–97).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this chapter was partially carried out in the scope of the MobiWise project: From mobile sensing to mobility advising (P2020 SAICTPAC/0011/2015), cofinanced by COMPETE 2020, Portugal 2020 – Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI), European Union’s ERDF (European Regional Development Fund), and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). David Perez Abreu wishes to acknowledge the Portuguese funding institution FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology for supporting his research under the Ph.D. grant SFRH/BD/117538/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Informatics and Systems, Department of Informatics Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Marilia Curado, Henrique Madeira, Paulo Rupino da Cunha, Bruno Cabral, David Perez Abreu, João Barata, Licínio Roque & Roger Immich

Authors
  1. Marilia Curado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henrique Madeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paulo Rupino da Cunha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bruno Cabral
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Perez Abreu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. João Barata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Licínio Roque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Roger Immich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilia Curado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, Maryland, USA

    Alexander Kott

  2. Engineer Research and Development Center, US Army Corps of Engineers, Concord, Massachusetts, USA

    Igor Linkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Curado, M. et al. (2019). Internet of Things. In: Kott, A., Linkov, I. (eds) Cyber Resilience of Systems and Networks. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77492-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77492-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77491-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77492-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation