Abstract
Human resources resemble a crucial bottleneck in certain parts of the world, as a lack of qualified human resources can hinder the introduction of renewable and energy efficient technologies, as well as the wider application of appropriate technology and, even more importantly, maintenance of those technologies. Concerning capacity building, for example in the field of sustainable energy, recommendations include the use of lifelong learning measures such as dedicated capacity building and continuous professional development programmes, or the extension of curricula to better prepare learners for employment in green economic sectors. These short and longer-term measures should focus on building interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary skills and knowledge as required in sustainability related jobs. This chapter addresses the challenges and opportunities which open online interventions, such as massive open online courses (MOOCs), combined with open educational resources (OER), can offer to provide wider and free access to interdisciplinary high quality knowledge provision. An area for which this is in high demand is energy access, energy security and energy efficiency (EASE) and its relation to climate change, for which there is a growing demand across professions and age levels, and a deficit especially in the developing world. This will be illustrated through the key online component of a dedicated lifelong learning model developed by the European funded EDULINK project L3EAP (short for “Lifelong Learning for Energy Access, Security and Efficiency in African and Pacific Small island Developing States”). It is argued that approaches like the L3EAP mentored MOOC have the potential to play an important role in building and strengthening human capacities in less developed regions of the world, where awareness of and knowledge about sustainable energy technologies and climate change can be lacking. The authors conclude that embracing ICT solutions can be a valuable cross-cutting measure to address the lack of human capacity in distant, less developed and remote locations, such as Small Island Developing States (SIDS), which may constrain a quicker uptake of sustainable energy technologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2004). User-Centered Design. In W. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Canada: Athabasca University Press.
Belanger, Y., Thornton, J., & Barr, R. C. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach-duke university’s first MOOC. EducationXPress, 2013(2), 1.
Breslow, L., Pritchard, D. E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G. S., Ho, A. D., & Seaton, D. T. (2013). Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX’s first MOOC. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8.
Bretschneider, M., & Pflaum, E. (2016). Lernendenzentrierung im Lehren und Lernen mit digitalen Medien. Teaching Trends 2016. Digitalisierung in der Hochschule: Mehr Vielfalt in der Lehre, pp. 111–120.
Castillo, N. M., Lee, J., Zahra, F. T., & Wagner, D. A. (2015). MOOCS for development: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Information Technologies & International Development, 11(2), 35–42.
Conole, G. (2014). A new classification schema for MOOCs. The international journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2(3), 65–77.
Clarke. (2013). MOOCs: Taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC, blogpost. Available online from: http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/moocs-taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html.
Daradoumis, T., Bassi, R., Xhafa, F., & Caballé, S. (2013). A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment. 2013 Eighth International Conference on paper presented at the P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC).
de Waard, I., Gallagher, M. S., Zelezny-Green, R., Czerniewicz, L., Downes, S., Kukulska-Hulme, A., et al. (2014). Challenges for conceptualising EU MOOC for vulnerable learner groups. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, 2014, 33–42.
DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper Series 15. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from http://www.maximise-ict.co.uk/WP15_DiMaggioHargittai.pdf.
E-Trainer. (2017). Tipps zur Motivation. https://elearn.leading-interactive.de/mod/folder/view.php?id=1360.
Gené, O. B., Núñez, M. M., & Blanco, Á. F. (2014). Gamification in MOOC: challenges, opportunities and proposals for advancing MOOC model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality.
Hashmi, A.H. (2013). The Harvard Crimson, HarvardX Set to Launch Second SPOC. September 17, 2013. http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/9/17/kennedy-school-spoc-edx/.
Hood, N., & Littlejohn, A. (2016). Quality in MOOCs: Surveying the terrain.
Innis, V. (2012). The implementation of low-carbon and green economy measures in small island developing states. Commonwealth Secretariat (2012). Small States Economic Review and Basic Statistics, Volume 16, doi:10.14217/smalst-2012-en.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizons, 59(4), 441–450. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.03.008.
Kay, J., Reimann, P., Diebold, E., & Kummerfeld, B. (2013). MOOCs: So many learners so much potential. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(3), 70–77.
Keegan, D. (1998). The two modes of distance education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 13(3), 43–47. doi:10.1080/0268051980130306.
Kirkwood, A., Price, L. (2016). Technology-enabled learning implementation handbook: Commonwealth of learning (COL). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11599/2363.
Leading Interactive (LI) (2017), Lerntypen, Qualifikation e-Trainer, internal learning material, https://elearn.leading-interactive.de/mod/folder/view.php?id=1360.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202–227.
L3EAP (2017). Strengthening human capacity for the development of energy access, security and efficiency in sids, recommendation report. http://project-l3eap.eu/downloads/viewcategory/10-results.html.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. doi:10.1080/01587910500081269.
Mruck, K., Mey, G., Schön, S., Idensen, H., & Purgathofer, P. (2013). Offene Lehr- und Forschungsressourcen, in: L3T Lehrbuch für Lernen und Lehren mit Technologien. http://l3t.eu/homepage/das-buch/ebook-2013/kapitel/o/id/112/name/offene-lehr-und-forschungsressourcen.
Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319.
Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 Proceedings, 5825–5834.
Pflaum, E., Wolf, F. (2018). Lernendenzentrierung und Kompetenzorientierung im Online-Kurs “Sustainable Energy for SIDS”. In Leal Filho, W. (Ed), Innovation in der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, Theorie und Praxis der Nachhaltigkeit, Springer, (forthcoming).
Siemens, G., Dawson, S., & Gašević, D. (eds.) (2015). Preparing for the Digital University. Retrieved September 1, 2016 from http://linkresearchlab.org/PreparingDigitalUniversity.pdf.
UNEP. (2014). GEO small island developing states outlook. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
Waks, L. J. (2016). The evolution and evaluation of massive open online courses: MOOCs in motion. Berlin: Springer.
Wolf, F., Seyfarth, F., & Pflaum, E. (2018). Scalable capacity-building. Scalable online capacity-building for heterogeneous, geographically dispersed learners. In U. C. Pandey & V. Inrakanti (Eds.), Open and distance learning for sustainable growth in emerging nations. IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2621-6.
Wolf, F., Becker, D., Leal, W., Krink, J., Haselberger, & Kowald, M. (2016). Sustainable energy generation and use in SIDS and beyond—the L3EAP online learning approach, Brazilian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2).doi:10.1186/s40552-016-0021-8.
Yuan, L., Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. A white paper, http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2013/667.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Baecker, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of distance education research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21–50.
Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wolf, F., Curran, F., Pflaum, E., Ramic, H. (2018). Education for Sustainability: Integrating Climate Change and Energy into Lifelong Learning Initiatives for Small Island Developing States. In: Azeiteiro, U., Leal Filho, W., Aires, L. (eds) Climate Literacy and Innovations in Climate Change Education. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70199-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70199-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70198-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70199-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)