Skip to main content

The Importance of Consent in User Comfort with Personalization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10540))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Numerous research projects have documented concerns that users have with data commonly used by recommender systems. In this paper, we extend that work by specifically investigating the link between consent, explicitly given, and privacy concern. In a study with 662 subjects, we found that the majority of users would not consent to data from outside systems being used to personalize their experience, and sizable minorities object to even internal system data being used. Among those who said they could consent, found they are often uncomfortable with the data being used if they are not asked to consent, but become comfortable after they can explicitly give their consent. We discuss implications for recommender systems going forward, specifically with respect to incorporating data into algorithms when users are unlikely to consent to its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Awad, N.F., Krishnan, M.S.: The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Q. 30, 13–28 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Golbeck, J.: User privacy concerns with common data used in recommender systems. In: Spiro, E., Ahn, Y.-Y. (eds.) SocInfo 2016. LNCS, vol. 10046, pp. 468–480. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., Newell, C.: Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(4–5), 441–504 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L.F.: Privacy indexes: a survey of westinÕs studies. Institute for Software Research International (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramakrishnan, N., Keller, B.J., Mirza, B.J., Grama, A.Y., Karypis, G.: Privacy risks in recommender systems. IEEE Internet Comput. 5(6), 54 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Riedl, J.: Personalization and privacy. IEEE Internet Comput. 5(6), 29–31 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lam, S.K., Frankowski, D., Riedl, J.: Do you trust your recommendations? an exploration of security and privacy issues in recommender systems. In: Müller, G. (ed.) ETRICS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3995, pp. 14–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11766155_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan, G.M., Artino Jr., A.R.: Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J. Grad. Med. Educ. 5(4), 541–542 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watson, J., Lipford, H.R., Besmer, A.: Mapping user preference to privacy default settings. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 22(6), 32 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Golbeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Golbeck, J. (2017). The Importance of Consent in User Comfort with Personalization. In: Ciampaglia, G., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10540. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-67255-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-67256-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics