Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Endoscopic and Keyhole Cranial Base Surgery pp 363–386Cite as

23 Intracranial Aneurysms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

Applying the keyhole principle (discussed in section “Intracranial Aneurysms: Keyhole Transcranial Approaches”), the vast majority of unruptured and ruptured aneurysms can be successfully treated using limited keyhole craniotomies. Suitable keyhole craniotomies for aneurysm surgery are the supraorbital, mini-pterional, interhemispheric, subtemporal, retrosigmoid and median suboccipital keyhole approaches. The most frequently used keyhole craniotomy for aneurysms is the supraorbital keyhole approach (SOKA). The most important limitations of keyhole craniotomies are: (1) limited ability to change the surgical trajectory during the operation, (2) restricted maneuverability of instruments and (3) impaired visualization based on the limited opening. Thus, meticulous preoperative planning and the use of endoscopes as well as specific keyhole instruments are mandatory. Good outcomes could be achieved in 96.5% of patients with unruptured aneurysms treated through keyhole craniotomies with an endoscopic-assisted technique. The endoscope provided important visual information that led to clip repositioning in 19.1% of cases. Cosmetic results in patients treated via a SOKA were rated very satisfactory by 84% or satisfactory by 8.8% and no or only little postoperative discomfort was reported by 89.3% of the patients. Permanent morbidity was frontal hypesthesia in 3.4%, hyposmia in 2.1% and palsy of the frontalis muscle in 2.1% in this group. In general, a trend for fewer complications was associated with surgical treatment of aneurysms using keyhole craniotomies. Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) for the clipping of intracranial aneurysms (discussed in section “Intracranial Aneurysms: Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches”) is a relatively new but controversial topic in cerebrovascular surgery. In recent years, various authors have reported successful results utilizing the EEA to treat vascular lesions for specific, well-selected cases. Advantages of the EEA include improved visualization, elimination of brain retraction, decreased manipulation of adjacent neurovascular structures, improved cosmesis and quicker recovery. However, concerns regarding the ability to manage intra-operative rupture as well as the difficulty in performing such delicate maneuvers in a long, narrow nasal corridor, a lack of familiarity with endonasal anatomy and adequate instrumentation have created hesitation among most cerebrovascular surgeons. Despite these difficulties, well-selected patients can have excellent results with this technique when applied by experienced teams. The strengths and weaknesses of utilizing the EEA for aneurysm clipping along with our indications for patient selection, surgical technique and outcomes reported in the literature to date are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References (Key References Bolded)

  1. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1821–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, Rinkel GJ. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:626–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alshekhlee A, Mehta S, Edgell RC, Vora N, Feen E, Mohammadi A, et al. Hospital mortality and complications of electively clipped or coiled unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1471–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiebers DO, International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators (ISUIA). Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Falk Delgado A, Andersson T, Falk DA. Clinical outcome after surgical clipping or endovascular coiling for cerebral aneurysms: a pragmatic meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials with short- and long-term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(3):264–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer G, Stadie A, Reisch R, Hopf NJ, Fries G, Böcher-Schwarz H, et al. The keyhole concept in aneurysm surgery: results of the past 20 years. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1 Suppl Operative):45–51; discussion 51.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hopf NJ, Füllbier L. Minimally invasive neurosurgery for vascular lesions. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2010;21(4):673–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reisch R, Fischer G, Stadie A, Kockro R, Cesnulis E, Hopf N. The supraorbital endoscopic approach for aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6S):130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reisch R, Stadie A, Kockro RA, Hopf N. The keyhole concept in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79(2 Suppl):S17.e9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edjlali M, Gentric J-C, Régent-Rodriguez C, Trystram D, Hassen WB, Lion S, et al. Does aneurysmal wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI help to distinguish stable from unstable intracranial aneurysms? Stroke. 2014;45:3704–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Musahl C, Weissbach C, Hopf NJ. Neuromonitoringin. In: Spetzler, Kalani, Nakaji, editors. Neurovascular Surgery. 2nd ed. Stuttgart-New York: Thieme; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hopf NJ, Perneczky A. Endoscopic neurosurgery and endoscope-assisted microneurosurgery for the treatment of intracranial cysts. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:1330–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zacharia BE, Bruce SS, Carpenter AM, Hickman ZL, Vaughan KA, Richards C, et al. Variability in outcome after elective cerebral aneurysm repair in high-volume academic medical centers. Stroke. 2014;45:1447–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopf NJ, Stadie A, Reisch R. Management of bilateral middle cerebral artery aneurysms via a unilateral supraorbital key-hole craniotomy. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2009;52(3):126–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reisch R, Marcus HJ, Hugelshofer M, Koechlin NO, Stadie A, Kockro RA. Patients’ cosmetic satisfaction, pain, and functional outcomes after supraorbital craniotomy through an eyebrow incision. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):730–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kassam AB, Mintz AH, Gardner PA, Horowitz MB, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH. The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONSE162–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Mintz A, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Horowitz M. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of an unsecured superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007;107:1047–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitano M, Taneda M. Extended transsphenoidal approach to anterior communicating artery aneurysm: aneurysm incidentally identified during macroadenoma resection: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:E299–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ensenat J, Alobid I, de Notaris M, Sanchez M, Valero R, Prats-Galino A, et al. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of a ruptured vertebral-posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:onsE121–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Froelich S, Cebula H, Debry C, Boyer P. Anterior communicating artery aneurysm clipped via an endoscopic endonasal approach: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:310–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Germanwala AV, Zanation AM. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clipping of ruptured and unruptured paraclinoid cerebral aneurysms: case report. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:234–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Drazin D, Zhuang L, Schievink WI, Mamelak AN. Expanded endonasal approach for the clipping of a ruptured basilar aneurysm and feeding artery to a cerebellar arteriovenous malformation. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Somanna S, Babu RA, Srinivas D, Rao KVLN, Vazhayil V. Extended endoscopic endonasal transclival clipping of posterior circulation aneurysms: an alternative to the transcranial approach. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:2077–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gardner PA, Vaz-Guimaraes F, Jankowitz B, Koutourousiou M, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, et al. Endoscopic endonasal clipping of intracranial aneurysms: surgical technique and results. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(5):1380–93.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yildirim AE, Divanlioglu D, Karaoglu D, Cetinalp NE, Belen AD. Purely endoscopic endonasal clipping of an incidental anterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1378–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vaz-Guimaraes F, Su SY, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Hemostasis in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg – Part B. 2015;76:296–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horowitz MB. Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2013;73(2 Suppl Operative):261–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Snyderman C, Kassam A, Carrau R, Mintz A, Gardner P, Prevedello DM. Acquisition of surgical skills for endonasal skull base surgery: a training program. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vaz-Guimaraes F, Rastelli MM Jr., Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang EW, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Impact of dynamic endoscopy and bimanual-binarial dissection in endoscopic endonasal surgery training: a laboratory investigation. J Neurol Surg Part B. 2015;76(B5):365–71.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1882–6.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harvey RJ, Parmar P, Sacks R, Zanation AM. Endoscopic skull base reconstruction of large dural defects: a systematic review of published evidence. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:452–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Rastelli MM Jr, Peris-Celda M, Koutourousiou M, Peace D, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transcavernous posterior clinoidectomy with interdural pituitary transposition. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1): 91–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tormenti M, Latorre F, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal middle clinoidectomy: anatomic, radiological, and technical note. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):ons233–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Drake CG. The surgical treatment of vertebral-basilar aneurysms. Clin Neurosurg. 1969;16:114–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA. Training in neurorhinology; the impact of case volume on the learning curve. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2011;44(5):1223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Koutourousiou M, Garnder PA, Tormenti MJ, Henry SL, Stefko ST, Kassam AB, et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of skull base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):614–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Snyderman CH, Pant H, Kassam AB, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA. The learning curve for endonasal surgery of the cranial base: a systematic approach to training. In: Kassam AB, Gardner PA, editors. Endoscopic approaches to the skull base. Progress in neurological surgery, vol. 26. Basel: Karger; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vaz-Guimaraes F, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Wang E, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for vascular lesions: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60(4):503–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. *Invited senior authors. See chapter subsection for complete list of authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Hirslanden Private Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

    Nikolai J. Hopf

  2. Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Paul A. Gardner

Authors
  1. Nikolai J. Hopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul A. Gardner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul A. Gardner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cranial Base and Pituitary Surgery Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    James J. Evans

  2. Pituitary and Cranial Base Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA

    Tyler J. Kenning

  3. Cranial Base and Pituitary Surgery Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Christopher Farrell

  4. Skull Base, Pituitary and Cerebrovascular Surgery Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Varun R. Kshettry

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hopf, N.J., Gardner, P.A. (2019). 23 Intracranial Aneurysms. In: Evans, J., Kenning, T., Farrell, C., Kshettry, V. (eds) Endoscopic and Keyhole Cranial Base Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64379-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64379-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64378-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64379-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation