Abstract
We show that resonant dipole–dipole interactions between Rydberg atoms in a triangular lattice can give rise to artificial magnetic fields for spin excitations. We consider the coherent dipole–dipole coupling between np and ns Rydberg states and derive an effective spin-1/2 Hamiltonian for the np excitations. By breaking time-reversal symmetry via external fields, we engineer complex hopping amplitudes for transitions between two rectangular sub-lattices. The phase of these hopping amplitudes depends on the direction of the hop. This gives rise to a staggered, artificial magnetic field which induces non-trivial topological effects. We calculate the single-particle band structure and investigate its Chern numbers as a function of the lattice parameters and the detuning between the two sub-lattices. We identify extended parameter regimes where the Chern number of the lowest band is \( C=1 \) or \( C=2 \).
This article is part of the topical collection “Enlightening the World with the Laser” - Honoring T. W. Hänsch guest edited by Tilman Esslinger, Nathalie Picqué, and Thomas Udem.
References
D. Jaksch, C. Bruder, J.I. Cirac, C.W. Gardiner, P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998)
I. Bloch, Nature 1, 23 (2005)
T. Calarco, H.J. Briegel, D. Jaksch, J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 2137 (2000)
J.I. Cirac, P. Zoller, Nat. Phys. 8, 264 (2012)
T.H. Johnson, S.R. Clark, D. Jaksch, EPJ Quantum Technol. 1, 10 (2014)
I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)
W.S. Bakr, J.I. Gillen, A. Peng, S. Fölling, M. Greiner, Nature 462, 74 (2009)
W.S. Bakr, A. Peng, M.E. Tai, R. Ma, J. Simon, J.I. Gillen, S. Fölling, L. Pollet, M. Greiner, Science 329, 547 (2010)
J.F. Sherson, C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, M. Cheneau, I. Bloch, S. Kuhr, Nature 467, 68 (2010)
C. Weitenberg, M. Endres, J.F. Sherson, M. Cheneau, P. Schauß, T. Fukuhara, I. Bloch, S. Kuhr, Nature 471, 319 (2011)
T. Gericke, P. Würtz, D. Reitz, T. Langen, H. Ott, Nat. Phys. 4, 949 (2008)
P. Würtz, T. Langen, T. Gericke, A. Koglbauer, H. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 080404 (2009)
A. Auerbach, Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism (Springer, New York, 1994)
J. Simon, W.S. Bakr, R. Ma, M.E. Tai, P.M. Preiss, M. Greiner, Nature 472, 307 (2011)
C. Sanner, E.J. Su, W. Huang, A. Keshet, J. Gillen, W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 240404 (2012)
J. Ruseckas, G. Juzeliūnas, P. Öhberg, M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010404 (2005)
J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeliūnas, P. Öhberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011)
R. Dum, M. Olshanii, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1788 (1996)
Y.-J. Lin, R.L. Compton, A.R. Perry, W.D. Phillips, J.V. Porto, I.B. Spielman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 130401 (2009a)
Y.-J. Lin, R.L. Compton, K. Jiménez-García, J.V. Porto, I.B. Spielman, Nature 462, 628 (2009b)
Y.-J. Lin, R.L. Comption, K. Jiménez-García, W.D. Phillips, J.V. Porto, I.B. Spielman, Nat. Phys. 7, 531 (2011)
M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, S. Nascimbène, S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, I. Bloch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 255301 (2011)
D. Jaksch, P. Zoller, New J. Phys. 5, 56 (2003)
J. Struck, C. Ölschläger, R.L. Targat, P. Soltan-Panahi, A. Eckardt, M. Lewenstein, P. Windpassinger, K. Sengstock, Science 333, 996 (2011)
J. Struck, C. Ölschläger, M. Weinberg, P. Hauke, J. Simonet, A. Eckardt, M. Lewenstein, K. Sengstock, P. Windpassinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 225304 (2012)
K. Jiménez-García, L.J. LeBlanc, R.A. Williams, M.C. Beeler, A.R. Perry, I.B. Spielman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 225303 (2012)
R.N. Palmer, D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 180407 (2006)
R.N. Palmer, A. Klein, D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013609 (2008)
N.R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 185301 (2013)
G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, T. Esslinger, Nature 515, 237 (2014)
P. Hauke, O. Tieleman, A. Celi, C. Ölschläger, J. Simonet, J. Struck, M. Weinberg, P. Windpassinger, K. Sengstock, M. Lewenstein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 145301 (2012)
H. Zhang, Q. Guo, Z. Ma, X. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 87, 043625 (2013)
A. Sterdyniak, N.R. Cooper, N. Regnault, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 116802 (2015)
A.W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, I. Rousochatzakis, R. Moessner, P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041037 (2014)
A.W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, C. Gross, I. Bloch, P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 173002 (2015)
D. Peter, S. Müller, S. Wessel, H.P. Büchler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 025303 (2012)
A.V. Gorshkov, S.R. Manmana, G. Chen, J. Ye, E. Demler, M.D. Lukin, A.M. Rey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 115301 (2011a)
A.V. Gorshkov, S.R. Manmana, G. Chen, E. Demler, M.D. Lukin, A.M. Rey, Phys. Rev. A 84, 033619 (2011b)
N.Y. Yao, C.R. Laumann, A.V. Gorshkov, S.D. Bennett, E. Demler, P. Zoller, M.D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 266804 (2012)
D. Peter, N.Y. Yao, N. Lang, S.D. Huber, M.D. Lukin, H.P. Büchler, Phys. Rev. A 91, 053617 (2015)
N.Y. Yao, A.V. Gorshkov, C.R. Laumann, A.M. Läuchli, J. Ye, M.D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 185302 (2013)
D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, C. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 113002 (2015)
T.F. Gallagher, Rydberg Atoms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)
F. Nogrette, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, D. Barredo, L. Béguin, A. Vernier, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021034 (2014)
H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Léséleuc, T. Macrì, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, Nature 534, 667 (2016)
D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, arXiv:1607.03042
F. Robicheaux, N.M. Gill, Phys. Rev. A 89, 053429 (2014)
S. Bettelli, D. Maxwell, T. Fernholz, C.S. Adams, I. Lesanovsky, C. Ates, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043436 (2013)
H. Schempp, G. Güner, S. Wüster, M. Weidemüller, S. Whitlock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 093002 (2015)
B. Zygelman, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042704 (2012)
M. Kiffner, W. Li, D. Jaksch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 170402 (2013a)
M. Kiffner, W. Li, D. Jaksch, J. Phys. B 46, 134008 (2013b)
C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, G. Grynberg, Atom-Photon Interactions (J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998)
P.D. Ye, D. Weiss, R.R. Gerhardts, M. Seeger, K. von Klitzing, K. Eberl, H. Nickel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 3013 (1995)
A. Nogaret, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 253201 (2010)
D.R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B 14, 2239 (1976)
T. Fukui, Y. Hatsugai, H. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1674 (2005)
K. Singer, J. Stanojevic, M. Weidemüller, R. Cote, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 38, S295 (2005). ISSN issn0953-4075. http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-4075/38/2/021
T. Amthor, M. Reetz-Lamour, S. Westermann, J. Denskat, M. Weidemüller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 023004 (2007)
M. Kiffner, D. Ceresoli, D. Jaksch, J. Phys. B 49, 204004 (2016)
Y. Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. B 48, 11851 (1993)
X. Qi, Y. Wu, S. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 74, 45125 (2006)
H.M. Price, N.R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. A 85, 033620 (2012)
T.G. Walker, M. Saffman, Phys. Rev. A 77, 032723 (2008)
A.R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1960)
I.I. Beterov, I.I. Ryabtsev, D.B. Tretyakov, V.M. Entin, Phys. Rev. A 79, 052504 (2009)
D.A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D Line Data. http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.1.4, 23 December 2010)
W. Li, I. Mourachko, M.W. Noel, T.F. Gallagher, Phys. Rev. A 67, 052502 (2003)
N.W. Ashcroft, N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1976)
Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica Version 10.1 (Wolfram Research, Inc., Irvine, 2015)
Acknowledgements
M.K. thanks the National Research Foundation and the Ministry of Education of Singapore for support and Tilman Esslinger for helpful discussions. The authors would like to acknowledge the use of the University of Oxford Advanced Research Computing (ARC) facility in carrying out this work (http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22558).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Dipole Matrix Elements
We evaluate the matrix elements of the electric-dipole-moment operator \( \widehat{\boldsymbol{d}} \) of an individual atom via the Wigner–Eckert theorem [64, 65] and find
where \( {C}_{jm1q}^{j^{\prime }{m}^{\prime }} \) are Clebsch–Gordan coefficients and the spherical unit vectors \( {\boldsymbol{\epsilon}}_q \) in Eq. (23) are defined as
The reduced dipole matrix element is [64, 65]
where the \( 3\times 2 \) matrix in curly braces is the Wigner \( 6-j \) symbol, e is the elementary charge, and \( \left\langle {n}^{\prime }{l}^{\prime }|r| nl\right\rangle \) is a radial matrix element.
Appendix B: Rubidium Parameters
Here we calculate the strength of the dipole–dipole interaction for rubidium atoms and estimate the magnitude of the level shifts required for realizing our model. For \( n{s}_{1/2}\leftrightarrow n{p}_{3/2} \) transitions in rubidium with principal quantum number \( n=70 \), the reduced dipole moment \( \mathcal{D} \) in Eq. (25) is given by
where e is the elementary charge and \( {a}_0 \) is the Bohr radius. It follows that the strength of the dipole–dipole coupling \( {V}_0 \) in Eq. (7) for \( a=20\kern0.166667em \upmu \mathrm{m} \) is
The lifetime of the \( n{s}_{1/2} \) and \( n{p}_{3/2} \) states at temperature \( T=300\mathrm{K} \) and for \( n=70 \) is \( {T}_{\mathrm{s}}\approx 151.6\kern0.166667em \upmu \mathrm{s} \) and \( {T}_{\mathrm{p}}\approx 191.3\kern0.166667em \upmu \mathrm{s} \), respectively [66]. Note that these values take into account the lifetime reduction due to blackbody radiation. The hopping rates vary with the lattice parameters but are typically of the order of \( {V}_0 \). It follows that in principle many coherent hopping events can be observed before losses due to spontaneous emission set in. This finding is consistent with the experimental observations in Ref. [42]. Note that the magnitude of \( {V}_0 \) can be increased by reducing the size of the lattice constant a or by increasing n.
Next we discuss the requirements for reducing the general Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) to our model in Eq. (14). First, we note that the level shifts induced between Zeeman sub-states must be large compared to \( {V}_0 \) and hence of the order of \( 10\kern0.166667em \mathrm{MHz} \). Shifts of this magnitude can be realized with weak magnetic fields [67] or AC stark shifts [42]. Furthermore, the fine structure splitting between the \( n{s}_{1/2} \) and \( n{p}_{3/2} \) manifolds is \( \Delta {E}_{\mathrm{FS}}\approx 2\pi \times 10.8\kern0.166667em \mathrm{GHz} \) [68], which is much larger than \( {V}_0 \), and hence, it is justified to neglect off-resonant terms in Eq. (3). Finally, we note that the energy difference between the \( n{p}_{3/2} \) manifold and the nearby \( n{p}_{1/2} \) manifold is approximately \( 285\kern0.166667em \mathrm{MHz} \) [68], which is also much larger than \( {V}_0 \). It follows that the \( n{p}_{1/2} \) states can be safely neglected.
Appendix C: k-space Hamiltonian
The k-space Hamiltonian can be obtained by considering the single-excitation sub-space \( {\mathcal{E}}_1 \) spanned by the basis states
where \( \mid \alpha \Big\rangle \) denotes one p excitation at site \( \alpha \) and \( \mid 0\Big\rangle \) is the “vacuum” state with zero excitations, i.e. the atoms at all lattice sites are in state \( \mid {s}_{1/2}1/2\Big\rangle \). In order to solve the eigenvalue equation
with \( \mid \psi \Big\rangle \in {\mathcal{E}}_1 \), we describe the lattice in Fig. 1 by a rectangular Bravais lattice with a two-atomic basis. More specifically, the direct lattice points are given by the \( \mathcal{R} \) atoms such that the basis is comprised of one \( \mathcal{R} \) atom at \( \mathbf{0} \) and one \( \mathcal{B} \) atom at \( \left(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\right)/2 \). According to Bloch’s theorem [69], we can solve Eq. (29) with the Ansatz
where the coefficients \( {u}_{\alpha } \) can be written as
and \( \mathbf{k} \) is a point in the first Brillouin zone of the direct lattice. The vector \( \mathbf{U}\left(\alpha \right) \) in Eq. (31) is the Bravais lattice point associated with site \( \alpha \),
With Eqs. (30) and (31), Eq. (29) can be reduced to the following matrix equation for the amplitudes \( {\psi}_{\mathcal{R}} \) and \( {\psi}_{\mathcal{B}} \),
where the \( 2\times 2 \) matrix \( \mathcal{H}\left(\mathbf{k}\right) \) is the k-space Hamiltonian. We find \( \mathcal{H}\left(\mathbf{k}\right) \) using the software package MATHEMATICA [70] for each set of lattice parameters a and b. In general, the resulting expressions are too complicated to display here. In the special case of nearest-neighbour interactions only, we find
where \( \cos \left(\alpha \right)=1/{\left[1+{\left(b/a\right)}^2\right]}^{1/2} \) and \( {\left[\mathcal{H}\left(\mathbf{k}\right)\right]}_{21}={\left[\mathcal{H}\left(\mathbf{k}\right)\right]}_{12}^{\ast } \).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiffner, M., O’Brien, E., Jaksch, D. (2018). Topological Spin Models in Rydberg Lattices. In: Meschede, D., Udem, T., Esslinger, T. (eds) Exploring the World with the Laser. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64346-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64346-5_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64345-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64346-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)