Skip to main content

Psychophysical Evaluation of Audio Source Separation Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10169))

Abstract

Source separation evaluation is typically a top-down process, starting with perceptual measures which capture fitness-for-purpose and followed by attempts to find physical (objective) measures that are predictive of the perceptual measures. In this paper, we take a contrasting bottom-up approach. We begin with the physical measures provided by the Blind Source Separation Evaluation Toolkit (BSS Eval) and we then look for corresponding perceptual correlates. This approach is known as psychophysics and has the distinct advantage of leading to interpretable, psychophysical models. We obtained perceptual similarity judgments from listeners in two experiments featuring vocal sources within musical mixtures. In the first experiment, listeners compared the overall quality of vocal signals estimated from musical mixtures using a range of competing source separation methods. In a loudness experiment, listeners compared the loudness balance of the competing musical accompaniment and vocal. Our preliminary results provide provisional validation of the psychophysical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vincent, E., Gribonval, R., Févotte, C.: Performance measurement in blind audio source separation. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 14, 1462–1469 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent, E., Jafari, M.G., Plumbley. M.D.: Preliminary guidelines for subjective evaluation of audio source separation algorithms. In: Nandi, A.K., Zhu, X., (eds.) Proceedings of ICA Research Network International Workshop, Liverpool, UK, pp. 93–96 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. ITU. Recommendation ITU-R BS.1534-3: Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of audio systems (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emiya, V., Vincent, E., Harlander, N., Hohmann, V.: Subjective and objective quality assessment of audio source separation. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 19, 2046–2057 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartwright, M., Pardo, B., Mysore, G.J., Hoffman, M.: Fast and easy crowdsourced perceptual audio evaluation. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 619–623 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kornycky, J., Gunel, B., Kondoz, A.: Comparison of subjective and objective evaluation methods for audio source separation. In: Meetings on Acoustics, Paris, France, vol. 123, no. 5, p. 3569 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langjahr, P., Mowlaee, P.: Objective quality assessment of target speaker separation performance in multisource reverberant environment. In: 4th International Workshop on Perceptual Quality of Systems, Vienna, Austria, pp. 89–94 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, U., Moore, E., Lerch, A.: On the perceptual relevance of objective source separation measures for singing voice separation. In: IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA 2015) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cano, E., FitzGerald, D., Brandenburg, K.: Evaluation of quality of sound source separation algorithms: human perception vs quantitative metrics. In: EUSIPCO 2016, pp. 1758–1762 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fechner, G.T.: Elemente der Psychophysik. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig (1860)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gescheider, G.: Psychophysics: The Fundamentals, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher, H., Munson, W.A.: Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82–108 (1933)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore, B.C.J.: An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 6th edn. Brill, Leiden (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grais, E.M., Roma, G., Simpson, A.J.R., Plumbley, M.D.: Discriminative enhancement for single channel audio source separation using deep neural networks. In: 13th International Conference on Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation (LVA/ICA) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ono, N., Rafii, Z., Kitamura, D., Ito, N., Liutkus, A.: The 2015 signal separation evaluation campaign. In: Vincent, E., Yeredor, A., Koldovský, Z., Tichavský, P. (eds.) LVA/ICA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9237, pp. 387–395. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22482-4_45

    Google Scholar 

  16. Terrell, M.J., Simpson, A.J.R., Sandler, M.: The mathematics of mixing. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 62(1/2), 4–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dwass, M.: Modified randomization tests for nonparametric hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 28, 181–187 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson, A.J.R., Roma, G., Grais, E.M., Mason, R.D., Hummersone, C., Liutkus, A., Plumbley, M.D.: Evaluation of audio source separation models using hypothesis-driven non-parametric statistical methods. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Simpson, A.J.R., Roma, G., Plumbley, M.D.: Deep karaoke: Extracting vocals from musical mixtures using a convolutional deep neural network. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation, pp. 429–436 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants EP/L027119/1 and EP/L027119/2 from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). The authors also wish to thank the reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. R. Simpson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Simpson, A.J.R., Roma, G., Grais, E.M., Mason, R.D., Hummersone, C., Plumbley, M.D. (2017). Psychophysical Evaluation of Audio Source Separation Methods. In: Tichavský, P., Babaie-Zadeh, M., Michel, O., Thirion-Moreau, N. (eds) Latent Variable Analysis and Signal Separation. LVA/ICA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53547-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53547-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53546-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53547-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics