Skip to main content

‘It Has to Be Useful for the Pupils, of Course’ – Teachers as Intermediaries in Design with Children

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Nordic Contributions in IS Research (SCIS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 259))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We explore ways by which teachers act as intermediaries in information technology (IT) design with children through analyzing three of our design projects conducted with schoolchildren and their teachers. In our projects the teachers acted as informants and evaluators, but not as IT design partners, albeit they had a lot of decision-making power as steering-group members of the projects. The teachers offered valuable understanding of children through their general knowledge about child development and their knowledge of their class. Teachers also acted as valuable facilitators in the design process, enhancing children’s participation in the design process. They also acted as advocates of children and their learning. They considered children’s learning goals and fit with the curriculum and developed their own skills and knowledge to serve children’s learning. Occasionally, they also acted as advocates of children’s interests more generally; however, not in the sense of critical tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bødker, S., Buur, J.: The design collaboratorium – a place for usability design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 9(2), 152–169 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper, C., Bowers, J.: Representing the users: notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In: Thomas, P. (ed.) The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces, pp. 48–66. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Druin, A.: Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 592–599 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Druin, A.: The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 21(1), 1–25 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Druin, A., Bederson, B., Boltman, A., Miura, A., Knotts-Callahan, D., Platt, M.: Children as our technology design partners. In: Druin, A. (ed.) The Design of Children’s Technology, pp. 51–72. Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Druin, A., Bederson, B., Hourcade, J., Sherman, L., Revelle, G., Platner, M., Weng, S.: Designing a digital library for young children: an intergenerational partnership. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 398–405 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garzotto, F.: Broadening children’s involvement as design partners: from technology to “experience”. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 186–193 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. (eds.): Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guha, M., Druin, A., Fails, J.: Cooperative inquiry revisited: reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. Int. J. Child Comput. Interact. 1(1), 14–23 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., Göransson, B.: Usability professionals – current practices and future development. Interact. Comput. 18(4), 568–600 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iivari, N.: Understanding the work of an HCI practitioner. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI, pp. 185–194 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iivari, N.: Culturally compatible usability work - an interpretive case study on the relationship between usability work and its cultural context in software product development organizations. J. Organ. End User Comput. 22(3), 40–65 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iivari, N.: Usability specialists as boundary spanners – an appraisal of usability specialists’ work in multiparty distributed open source software development effort. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8118, pp. 571–588. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Iivari, N., Karasti, H., Molin-Juustila, T., Salmela, S., Syrjänen, A.L., Halkola, E.: Mediation between design and use – revisiting five empirical studies. Hum. IT J. Inf. Technol. Stud. Hum. Sci. 10(2), 81–126 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karasti, H.: Increasing sensitivity towards everyday work practice in system design. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis, Scientiae Rerum Naturalium A 362. Oulu University Press, Oulu (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kyng, M.: Bridging the gap between politics and techniques: on the next practices of participatory design. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 49–68 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mambrey, P., Mark, G., Pankoke-Babatz, U.: User advocacy in participatory design: designers’ experiences with a new communication channel. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 7(3–4), 291–313 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Markus, M., Mao, Y.: User participation in development and implementation: updating an old tired concept for today’s IS contexts. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 5(11–12), 514–544 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mazzone, E., Iivari, N., Tikkanen, R., Read, J., Beale, R.: Considering context, content, management, and engagement in design activities with children. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 108–117 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mazzone, E., Read, J., Beale, R.: Design with and for disaffected teenagers. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI, pp. 290–297 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Molin-Juustila, T., Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., Halkola, E.: Multiple voices in ICT design with children – a nexus analytical enquiry. Behav. Inf. Technol. 34(11), 1079–1091 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pardo, S., Vetere, F., Howard, S.: Broadening stakeholder involvement in UCD: designers’ perspectives on child-centred design. In: Proceedings of OzCHI, pp. 1–9 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pardo, S., Vetere, F., Howard, S.: Teachers’ involvement in usability testing with children. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 89–92 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Read, R., Bekker, M.: The nature of child computer interaction. In: Proceedings of BHCI, pp. 163–170 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Read, J., Gregory, P., MacFarlane, S., McManus, B., Gray, P., Patel, R.: An investigation of participatory design with children-informant, balanced and facilitated design. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 53–64 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Read, J., MacFarlane, S.: Using the fun toolkit and other survey methods to gather opinions in child computer interaction. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 81–88 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Robertson, J.: Experiences of designing with children and teachers in the StoryStation project. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 29–41 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rode, J., Stringer, M., Toye, E., Simpson, A., Blackwell, A.: Curriculum-focused design. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 119–126 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., Davies, M.: Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 343–350 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Simonsen, J., Robertson, T. (eds.): Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tuovila, S., Iivari, N.: Bridge builders in IT artifact development. In: Proceedings of ECIS, pp. 819–830 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Virvou, M., Tsiriga, V.: Involving effectively teachers & students in the life cycle of an intelligent tutoring system. Educ. Technol. Soc. 3(3), 511–521 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yarosh, S., Radu, Y., Hunter, S., Rosenbaum, E.: Examining values: an analysis of nine years of IDC research. In: Proceedings of IDC, pp. 136–144 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the teachers, pupils, Master’s level students and LUKUINTO programme representatives for participating in this study. Especially we thank Tonja Molin-Juustila for her contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Netta Iivari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iivari, N., Kinnula, M. (2016). ‘It Has to Be Useful for the Pupils, of Course’ – Teachers as Intermediaries in Design with Children. In: Lundh Snis, U. (eds) Nordic Contributions in IS Research. SCIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43597-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics