Skip to main content

Non-expert Classification of Microcalcification Clusters Using Mereotopological Barcodes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1826 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9699))

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of mereotopological barcodes to help non-experts classify microcalcification clusters as either benign or malignant. When compared against classification using the microcalcification cluster segmentation maps, the use of barcodes is able to see a significant improvement in classification performance with the AUC significantly increasing (\(p < 0.01\)) from 0.62 for images to 0.82 for barcodes on the MIAS dataset. This shows that barcodes could prove useful to aid clinicians with interpreting and classifying mammographic microcalcifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Strange, H., Chen, Z., Denton, E.R.E., Zwiggelaar, R.: Modelling mammographic microcalcification clusters using persistent mereotopology. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 47, 157–163 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American College of Radiology: Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System BIRADS. Third edn. American College of Radiology (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birdwell, R.L., Morris, E.A., Wang, S.C., Parkinson, B.T.: Pocket Radiologist: Breast Top 100 Diagnoses. Amirsys, Salt Lake City (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Z., Strange, H., Oliver, A., Denton, E.R.E., Boggis, C., Zwiggelaar, R.: Topological modeling and classification of mammographic microcalcification clusters. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 62(4), 1203–1214 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma, Y., Tay, P.C., Adams, R.D., Zhang, J.Z.: A novel shape feature to classify microcalcifications. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2265–2268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shen, L., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L.: Application of shape analysis to mammographic calcifications. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13, 263–274 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren, B., Smith, A., Jing, Z.: Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis. In: Proceedings of Medical Imaging 2012: Physics of Medical Imaging (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galton, Antony: The mereotopology of discrete space. In: Freksa, Christian, Mark, David M. (eds.) COSIT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1661, p. 251. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connections. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D., Astley, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S., Taylor, P., Betal, D., Savage, J.:The mammographic images analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Digital Mammography, pp. 375–378 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oliver, A., Torrent, A., Lladó, X., Tortajada, M., Tortajada, L., Sentís, M., Freixenet, J., Zwiggelaar, R.: Automatic microcalcification and cluster detection for digital and digitised mammograms. Knowl.-Based Syst. 28, 68–75 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., Kegelmeye, W.P.: The digital database for screening mammography. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 212–218 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, J., Ling, C.: Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 17, 299–310 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J.: The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143(1), 29–36 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mason, S.J., Grahan, N.E.: Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 128, 2145–2166 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Levenson, R.M., Krupinski, E.A., Navarro, V.M., Wasserman, E.A.: Pigeons (Columb livia) as trainable observers of pathology and radiology breast cancer images. PLoS ONE 10(11), e0141357 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the organisers of the Science Café for the opportunity to conduct this experiment. They would also like to extend their gratitude to all the participants for their willingness to be involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry Strange .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Strange, H., Zwiggelaar, R. (2016). Non-expert Classification of Microcalcification Clusters Using Mereotopological Barcodes. In: Tingberg, A., Lång, K., Timberg, P. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9699. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41546-8_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41545-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41546-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics