Abstract
This article is a single-country empirical study of uncovered interest parity. Uncovered interest parity (hereafter UIP) is a non-arbitrary condition well-known and widely tested in international finance. This test of UIP is based on high-frequency data. The most promising parts of the evidence are the EGARCH analysis of statistical properties of time series of deviations from UIP, and the Markov Switching model. EGARCH (1,1) delivers a model able to predict future volatility of the tested variable. Moreover, the model also describes the time-varying nature of volatility itself. The changing nature of volatility may arise due to the process of information arrivals or being liquidity driven, but can also be a consequence of some structural breaks. Namely, the time series remains homoscedastic in the short-term while heteroscedasticity appears in long-term horizons. The regime switching model is further employed in order to test if the smoothed probabilities along the sample reflect the main events through which the economy evolved over time. The model proved to be able to indicate correctly the ex-ante identified structural break that came from crisis incident, but failed to differ between pre- and post-liberalisation periods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baillie R, Osterberg W (2000) Deviations from daily uncovered interest rate parity and the role of intervention. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 10(3–4):363–379
Beyaert A, García-Solanes J, Pérez-Castejón JJ (2007) Uncovered interest parity with switching regimes. Econ Model 24(2):189–202
Bhatti HR (2014) The existence of uncovered interest parity in the CIS countries. Econ Model 40(C):227–241
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econ 31(3):307–327
Calvo AG, Reinhart CM (2002) Fear of floating. Q J Econ 117(2):379–408
Chaboud PA, Wright JH (2005) Uncovered interest parity, it works, but not for long. J Int Econ 66(2):349–362
Chinn M, Dooley M (1995) Asia–Pacific capital markets: integration and implications for economic activity. NBER Working paper No. 5280
Christensen M (2000) Uncovered interest parity and policy behavior: new evidence. Econ Lett 69(1):81–87
Craighead W, Davis G, Miller N (2010) Interest differentials and extreme support for uncovered interest rate parity. Int Rev Econ Financ 19(4):723–732
Cuestas CJ, Filipozzi F, Staehr K (2015) Do foreign exchange forecasters believe in uncovered interest parity? Econ Lett 133:92–95
Cumby RE, Obstfeld M (1981) Exchange rate expectations and nominal interest differentials: a test of the Fischer hypothesis. J Financ 36(3):697–704
Dickey D, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with unit root. Econometrica 49(4):1057–1072
Domowitz I, Craig SH (1985) Conditional variance and the risk premium in the foreign exchange market. J Int Econ 19(1–2):47–66
Dooley PM, Isard P (1980) Capital controls, political risk, and deviations from interest–rate parity. J Polit Econ 88(2):370–384
Ellliott G, Rothenberg T, Stock J (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4):813–836
Engel C (2014) Exchange rates and interest parity. In: Gopinath G, Helpman E, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of international economics, vol 4. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 453–522
Engel C, Hamilton J (1990) Long swings in the exchange rate: are they in the data and do markets know it? Am Econ Rev 80(4):689–713
Faruqee H (1992) Dynamic capital mobility in Pacific Basin developing countries: estimation and policy implication. IMF Staff Pap 39(3):706–717
Flood PR, Rose AK (2002) Uncovered interest parity in crisis. IMF Staff Pap 49(2):252–266
Francis B, Hasan I, Hunter DM (2002) Emerging market liberalization and the impact on uncovered interest rate parity. J Int Money Financ 21(6):931–956
Froot AK (1990) Short rates and expected asset returns. NBER Working paper No. 3247, January
Froot AK, Thaler RH (1990) Anomalies: foreign exchange. J Econ Perspect 4(3):179–192
Goh KS, Lim GC, Olekalns N (2006) Deviations from uncovered interest parity in Malaysia. Appl Financ Econ 16(10):745–759
Green HW (2003) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Jiang C, Li X-L, Chang H-L, Su C-W (2013) Uncovered interest parity and risk premium convergence in Central and Eastern European countries. Econ Model 33(C):204–208
Kaminsky G (1993) Is there a peso problem? Evidence from the dollar/pound exchange rate, 1976–1987. Am Econ Rev 83(3):450–472
Kose MA, Prasad E, Jin Wei KRiS (2009) Finansijska globalizacija: Ponovna procena. Panoeconomicus 56(2):143–197
Lee B-J (2013) Uncovered interest parity puzzle: asymmetric responses. Int Rev Econ Financ 27(1):238–249
Li D, Ghoshray A, Morley B (2012) Measuring the risk premium in uncovered interest parity using the component GARCH-M model. Int Rev Econ Financ 24:167–176
Lothian J, Wu L (2011) Uncovered interest-rate parity over the past two centuries. J Int Money Financ 30(3):448–473
Marinković S (2014) Non-parametric sign test and paired samples test of effectiveness of official FX intervention. Econ Ann 59(202):107–130
Marinković S, Radović O (2016) Market volatility and foreign exchange intervention. In: Anastasios K, Aranđelović Z, Marinković S, Polychronidou P (eds) The first decade of living with the global crisis: economic and social developments in the Balkans and Eastern Europe. Springer, Switzerland
McCallum B (1994) A reconsideration of the uncovered interest parity relationship. J Monet Econ 33(1):105–132
Mehl A, Cappiello L (2009) Uncovered interest parity at long horizons: evidence on emerging economies. Rev Int Econ 17(5):1019–1037
Montiel JP (1994) Capital mobility in developing countries: some measurement issues and empirical estimates. World Bank Econ Rev 8(3):311–350
Moore M, Roche MJ (2012) When does uncovered interest parity hold? J Int Money Financ 31(4):865–879
Ng S, Perron P (2001) Leg length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69(6):1519–1554
Pasricha GK (2006) Survey of literature on covered and uncovered interest parities. MPRA paper No. 22737
Sachsida A, Ellery R Jr, Teixeira JR (2001) Uncovered interest parity and the peso problem: the Brazilian case. Appl Econ Lett 8(3):179–181
Sul D (1999) Does ex post uncovered interest differential reflect the degrees of capital mobility? Appl Econ Lett 6(2):97–102
Taylor PM (1995) The economics of exchange rates. J Econ Lit 33(1):13–47
Taylor PM (2005) Official foreign exchange interventions as a coordinating signal in the dollar-yen market. Pac Econ Rev 10(1):73–82
Acknowledgement
The authors are grateful to the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development for the funds and support that made this research possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marinković, S., Radović, O., Šević, Ž. (2016). Testing Uncovered Interest Parity for Structural Breaks: A Developing Country Perspective. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Kyrkilis, D., Makris, G., Polychronidou, P. (eds) Economic Crisis, Development and Competitiveness in Southeastern Europe. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40322-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40322-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-40321-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-40322-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)