Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Philosophy and International Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Michael Oakeshott's Political Philosophy of International Relations

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

Abstract

This chapter shows that Oakeshott’s philosophy is relevant to debates in international theory. It demonstrates that the critique of rationalism in politics is linked to the second Great Debate between classical and scientific approaches that was developed in the second half of the twentieth century. It shows that in Oakeshott’s texts there are references to Morgenthau’s critique of scientific politics, and that Hedley Bull’s argument against the scientific approach resembles Oakeshott’s one against rationalism. The chapter also highlights some of the differences between Oakeshott’s conception of history and those defended by the English School. The relevance of Oakeshott’s philosophy for the development of the so-called normative turn in International Relations is demonstrated. Finally, the chapter highlights some of the similarities between Oakeshott’s epistemology and recent constructivist literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Adler, E., and V. Pouliot. 2011. International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Astrov, A. 2005. On World Politics: R.G. Collingwood, M. Oakeshott and Neotraditionalism in International Relations. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayer, A.J. 2001. Logic, Truth and Logic. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, W 2007. Are There Any Lessons of History? The English School and the Activity of Being an Historian. International Politics 44: 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartelson, J. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, M. 2011. The Life and Thought of Herbert Butterfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D. 1984. The Creation of the Past: British Idealism and Michael Oakeshott’s Philosophy of History. History and Theory 23: 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D. 1993. Human Conduct, History, and Social Science in the Works of R.G. Collingwood and Michael Oakeshott. New Literary History 24(3): 697–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D. 1998. Political Theories of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 1992. International Relations. New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2006. Philosophie Politique et Relations Internationales Anglo-Américaine ou Pourquoi Existe-t-il une Théorie Internationale? Études Internationales 37(2): 223–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 1994. The Ethics of Political Restructuring in Europe. The Perspective of Constitutive Theory. In Political Restructuring in Europe. Ethical Perspectives, ed. C. Brown, 163–185. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2001. Understanding International Relations, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2012. The “Practice Turn,” Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory? Millennium—Journal of International Studies 40: 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. 1966a. International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach. World Politics 18: 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. 2000. International Relations as an Academic Pursuit. In Hedley Bull on International Society, eds. K. Alderson and A. Hurrell, 246–264. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H. 1944. The English Man and His History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1949. The Origin of Modern Science 1300– 1800, London: G. Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H. 1959. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. 2001. The English school: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies 27(3): 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2000. International Systems in World History. Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. 2009. We Have Never Been Whiggish (About Phlogiston). Centaurus 51(4): 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’ORO, G. 2014. Collingwood and Oakeshott. History and Idealism. In The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics, eds. J. Malpas and H.H. Gander, 191–203. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. 1995. The Social Construction of International Society. European Journal of International Relations 1(3): 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the Collège de France. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. 1990. Oakeshott. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilhot, N. 2011. The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory. In Guilhot, N. ed. The Invention of International Relations Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 128–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddock, B. 1996. Michael Oakeshott: “Rationalism in Politics”. In The Political Classics: Green to Dworkin, eds. M. Forsyth and M. Keens-Soper, 100–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A.R. 1983. On Whiggism. History of Science 21: 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, I. 2006. The International Thought of Martin Wight. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamati-Ataya, I. 2012. Beyond (Post)Positivism: The Missed Promises of Systemic Pragmatism. International Studies Quarterly 56: 291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C.G. 1942. The Function of General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy. 39(2): 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S.H. 1959. International Relations: The Long Road to Theory. World Politics 11(3): 346–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, S., and I. Tregenza. 2014. Rationalism and Tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott Conversation. European Journal of Political Theory 13(1): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. 2003. Whigs and Histories. Herbert Butterfield and the Historiography of Science. History of Science 41: 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, R. 2005. Tradition as Invention: The “Traditions Tradition” and the History of Ideas in International Relations. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 34(1): 57–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. 1957. System and Process in International Politics New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1961. Problems of Theory Building and Theory Confirmation in International Politics. World Politics 14(1): 6–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, M. 1966. The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World Politics 19(1): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F.V. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F.V. 2014. The Status of Law in World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linklater, A., and H. Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations. A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mcintyre, K. 2011. Herbert Butterfield. History, Providence, and Skeptical Politics. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, S. 2004. Truth, Power, Theory: Hans Morgenthau’s Formulation of Realism. Diplomacy & Statecraft 15(1): 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1955. Reflections on the State of Political Science. The Review of Politics 17(4): 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1970. Truth and Power. Essays of a Decade 1960–1970. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1985. Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace, 6th edn. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardin, T. 1983. Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardin, T. 2001. The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott. University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2008. Theorising the International Rule of Law. Review of International Studies 34(3): 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, M. 1993. Interpretation and the “Science” of International Relations. Review of International Studies 19(1): 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. 1933. Experience and Its Modes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. 1975. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1991. In Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. Ed. T. Fuller. 2nd edn. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1993a. Religion, Politics, and the Moral Life. Ed. T. Fuller. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1993b. Morality and Politics in Modern Europe. Ed. S.R. Letwin. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1999. On History and Other Essays. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2004. What is History and Other Essays. Ed. L. O’Sullivan. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2006. Lectures in the History of Political Thought. Eds. L. O’Sullivan and T. Nardin. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2007. The Concept of a Philosophical Jurisprudence. Essays and Reviews 1926–1951. Ed. L. O’Sullivan. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, N. 2013. Making Sense, Making Worlds. constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, D. 2015b. Oakeshott on Practice, Normative Thought and Political Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(3): 545–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. 2003a. Oakeshott on History. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2003b. Introduction. In Oakeshott, M. What is History? And Other Essays, ed. L. O’Sullivan, 1–30. Exeter: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2012. World of Experience: History. In The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott, ed. E. Podoksik, 42–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, L. 2000. Michael Oakeshott on European Political History. History of Political Thought 21(1): 132–151

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, N. 2012. Oakeshott on Civil Association. In A Companion to Oakeshott, eds. P. Franco and L. Marsh, 290–231. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. 2005. Tragedy or Scepticism? Defending the Anti-Pelagian Mind in World Politics. International Relations 19(3): 321–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reus-Smit, C. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State. Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2002. Imagining Society. Constructivism and the English School. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(3): 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2003a. Constructivism. In Theories of International Relations, 3rd edn, eds. S. Burchill and A. Liklater, 188–211. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 2000. “Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organisation 54(1): 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J.G. 1993. Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations. International Organisation 47(1): 139–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.W. 1996. Michael Oakeshott on History, Practice and Political Theory. History of Political Thought XVIII(4): 591–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.W. 1999. International Relations and History. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, T.D. 1956. Political Principles. In Philosophy, Politics and Society, ed. P. Laslett, 22–34. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. 1966. Why There is No International Theory. In Diplomatic Investigations, eds. H. Butterfield and M. Wight, 17–34. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. 1991. International Theory. The Three Traditions. Eds. G. Wight and H. Bull. Leicester & London: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.C. 2013. In the Beginning: The International Relations Enlightenment and the End of International Relations Theory. European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 647–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liceo Linguistico Internazionale, Baranzate, Italy

    Davide Orsi

Authors
  1. Davide Orsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Orsi, D. (2016). Philosophy and International Relations. In: Michael Oakeshott's Political Philosophy of International Relations. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38785-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation