Skip to main content

Introduction: Unraveling the Polysemy Around Policy Evaluation

There are different paths to understand evaluation or evaluation processes in public policies. In common, however, we can say that all paths lead to the production of a very specific type of knowledge: evaluative knowledge. Thus, discussing the nature of “knowledge” can be a good starting point for us to delve into evaluation. This is because it can help us problematize its definition within a multidisciplinary field of studies and practices, considering its different possibilities of configuration and representation, which includes the main epistemological disputes that we find behind its polysemy, its method disagreements, the dynamics behind the construction of publics, as well as its traditional formative logics. All these elements, among others, can help us to understand the social context of the evaluative knowledge production, which is increasingly gaining ground not only in the processes of governing and of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albaek E (1998) Knowledge, interests and the many meanings of evaluation: a developmental perspective. Scand J Soc Welf 7:94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkin MC (1985) A guide for evaluation decision makers. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkin MC, Christie CA (2004) Evaluation theory tree revisited. In: Alkin MC (ed) ‘Evaluation roots: tracing theorists’ views and influences’. Sage Publications, pp 381–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schon DA (1978) Organizational learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezzi C (2007) Il Disegno della Ricerca Valutativa. Franco Angeli, Milão

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullosa RF (2009) Introdução à Avaliação e Monitoramento de Projetos Sociais. In: Boullosa RF, Araújo ET (2009) Avaliação e Monitoramento de Projetos Sociais. 1. ed. Curitiba: IESDE. v. 1000. 262p

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullosa RF (2018) Gestão Social e Avaliação. In: de Oliveira Neto JM, Junior JTS (eds) Gestão Social, vol 1, 1st edn. Fundação Demócrito Rocha/UANE/BID/STDS, Fortaleza, pp 267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullosa RF (2019) Mirando ao revés as políticas públicas: o desenvolvimento de uma abordagem crítica e reflexiva para o estudo das políticas públicas. Publicações da Escola da AGU, série especial:89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullosa RF (2020) Para onde tem nos levado a pandemia? Entre tantos desamparos públicos, precisamos também falar sobre avaliação em políticas públicas. Revista NAU Social v.11, n.21, p. 427–442 Nov 2020 / Abr 2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullosa RF, Peres JLP (2020) Análise e elaboração e gestão de programas e projetos de desenvolvimento socioterritorial. UFBA, Escola de Administração, Salvador

    Google Scholar 

  • Boullosa RF, Peres, JLP, Bessa LFM (in press) Por dentro do campo: uma narração reflexiva dos estudos críticos em políticas públicas. Revista Organizações & Sociedade, Escola de Administração, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1976) Le champ scientifique: Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, vol 2. Ed. du Seuil, Paris, p 88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozzi SO (2001) Evaluación de la gestión pública: conceptos y aplicaciones en el caso latinoamericano. Revista do Serviço Público 52(1):25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook TD, Gruder CL (1978) Metaevaluation research. Eval Q 2(1):5–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria CAP (2005) A política da avaliação de políticas públicas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo 20(59):97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (1995) Evaluating public policy. Nelson-Hall, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F (2003) Beyond empiricism: policy analysis as deliberative practice. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society (theories of institutional design). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209–227

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer F, Forester J (1993) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guba & Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks B (1994) Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus GE (2008) Le citoyen sentimental: Emotions et politique en démocratie. Collection Sociétés en mouvement. Presses de Sciences Po, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokate K (2009) Convirtiendo el “monstruo” en aliado: la evaluación como herramienta de la gerencia social. Instituto Interamericano para el Desarrollo Social – INDES

    Google Scholar 

  • Orata PT (1940) Evaluating evaluation. J Educ Res 33:641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1988) The evaluator’s responsibility for utilization. Eval Pract 9:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (1997) Utilization-focused evaluation, 3rd edn. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres JLP (2020) Reinterpretando o fluxo de políticas públicas a partir da experiência: do pragmatismo crítico ao Hip Hop da Ceilândia/DF (Tese de Doutorado), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento, Sociedade e Cooperação Internacional – PPGDSCI. UnB, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues RW (2014) Monitoramento (entry). In: de Freitas Boullosa R (ed) Dicionário para a Formação em Gestão Social, vol 1, 1ed edn. Editora CIAGS, Salvador, pp 144–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi PH, Wright JD (1984) Evaluation research: an assessment. Annu Rev Sociol 10:331–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safatle V (2015) Circuito dos Afetos: Corpos políticos, Desamparo, Fim do Indivíduo. Cosac Naify, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professional think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven M (1967) The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler RW, Gagne RM, Scriven M (eds) Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Rand-McNally, Chicago, pp 39–83

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2020). The Eval4Action campaign – a decade of action to deliver the SDGs by 2030. Access: https://www.eval4action.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss C (1972) Evaluation research: methods for assessing program effectiveness. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss C (1994) Evaluation: methods for studying programs and policies. Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (1989) What Washington Means by Policy Reform. In: Williamson, John (ed.): Latin American Readjustment: How Much has Happened, Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollman H (2007) Policy evaluation and evaluation research. In: Fischer F, Miller GJ, Sidney M (eds) Handbook of public policy analysis – theory, politics and methods. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

de Freitas Boullosa, R. (2021). Policy Evaluation, Brazil. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3759-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3759-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics