Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Anticipation pp 1–18Cite as

Why Sociology Needs Anticipation?

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

It is possible to underline a strong tendency toward “mainstreaming the future” – to use John Urry’s expression within sociology today. The introduction of the future in sociological theory and research is not simply the opening of a new “field of inquiry” but rather is profoundly related to some of the problems that the discipline has encountered in its development and meets some of the answers that have recently been at the core of its development.

The number of theoretical reflections and empirical analyses that consider the future is increasing, and the field of studies of futurity in sociology is flourishing, with new contributions added every day (for instance, in youth studies, feminist studies, emotion and affect studies, and science and technology). The chapter focuses on three main theoretical and analytical themes in this development.

The first theme concerns the link between social action and anticipation. I argue that there is a profound link between futurity and social action, which has always been present, although not sufficiently developed, in social theory (Schutz, Mead, Bourdieu).

The second theme concerns the development of the latent futures dimension and the related idea that an encounter with the future is not simply “an encounter with a non-tangible and invisible world” (Adam and Groves, Future matters. Action, knowledge, ethic, 2007: XV).

The third theme, which concludes the chapter, can be called the re-enchantment of the future, that is, the recognition of the importance of nonrational, emotional, and imaginative elements for anticipating the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adam, B., & Groves, C. (2007). Future matters. Action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (2009a). Future in the making. Sociological practice and challenge. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), Handbook of public sociology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (2009b). Cultural future matters an exploration in the spirit of max Weber’s methodological writings. Time and Society, 18(1), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B., Beck, U., & Loon, J. (Eds.). (2000). The risk society and beyond. Critical issues for social theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2010). Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 777–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (2015). Banking on words the failure of language in the age of derivative finance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, R. (2004). The capacity to aspire. Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Cultural and public action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Back, L. (2015). Blind pessimism and the sociology of hope. Discover Sociology. Available at: http://discoversociety.Org/2015/12/01/blind-pessimism-and-the-sociology-of-hope/?utm_content=buffer5ea12&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

  • Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (2009). Public sociology and the future: The possibile, the probabile, the preferable. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), Handbook of Public Sociology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Oxford: Stanford University Press/Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review. 70(1), 4–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. (2016). A sensory sociology of the future: affect, hope and inventive methodologies. The Sociological Review, 00, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R., & Tutton, R. J. C. (2017). Introduction to futures in question: Theories, methods, practices. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12448.

  • Desroche H. (1979) Sociology of hope (C. Martin-Sperry, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1981). The need for a recovery of philosophy. In J. J. McDermott (Ed.), The philosophy of John Dewey (pp. 58–97). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2013). Reinvention. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, E. (2011). The future of futures. The time of money in financing and society. Cheltenham: Edward Edgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, V. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of public sociology. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility in search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (1972). Inventing the future in spite of futurology. Future Essays, 4, 369–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2013). Utopia as a method. The imaginary reconstitution of society. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1982). The Differentiation of Society. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2005). The future birth of the affective fact. Conference Proceedings: Genealogies of Biopolitics. Available at: http://browse.reticular.info/text/collected/massumi.pdf

  • Mead, G. H. (2002[1932]).The philosophy of the present. New York: Prometheus Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A. (2009). Projects and possibilities: Researching futures in action. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzzetto, L. (2006). Time and meaning in Alfred Schütz. Time and Society, 15(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2009). Reflexivity and the habitus. In M. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about reflexivity (pp. 108–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1967a). The phenomenology of the social world (G. Walsh & F. Lehnert, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A. (1967b). Collected papers, the problem of social reality. The Hague: Martinus NiJhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, S. M. (2015). Future moves: Forward-oriented studies of culture, society, and technology. Current Sociology, 63(2), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavory, I., & Eliasoph, N. (2013). Toward a theory of anticipation. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 908–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. (1994). The social theory of practices: Tradition, tacit knowledge, and presuppositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutton, R. (2017). Wicked futures: meaning, matter and the sociology of the future. The Sociological Review, 00, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2016). What is the future? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2013). Societies beyond oil. Oil dregs and social futures. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2003). Global complexities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. (2007). Modes of hoping. History of the Human Sciences, 20(3), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weigert, A. (2014). Realizing narratives make future time real. Time and Society, 23(3), 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Giuliana Mandich

Authors
  1. Giuliana Mandich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuliana Mandich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept of Sociology & Social Research, University of Trento Dept of Sociology & Social Research, Trento, Italy

    Roberto Poli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mandich, G. (2017). Why Sociology Needs Anticipation?. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_65-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_65-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation