Skip to main content

SmartStrokes: Digitizing Paper-Based Neuropsychological Tests

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

Clinical neuropsychologists develop comprehensive behavioral profiles on their patients primarily by using paper-and-pencil test stimuli. Despite these tests being significantly cheaper and faster than complex procedures such as MRI scans, multiple drawbacks remain. Constructing these behavioral profiles can take upwards of six hours to fully complete, and the analysis of the sketches from these pencil-and-paper tests is still largely subjective and qualitative. We developed SmartStrokes, a testing suite that implements digital versions of common clinical neuropsychology pencil-and-paper tests, with the purpose of helping to automate and analyze patient sketches using the principles of sketch recognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Clock Drawing Test, Iowa Geriatric Education Center, 2014, https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/igec/tools/cognitive/clockDrawing.pdf.

References

  1. Aly N, Playfer J, Smith S, Halliday D (2007) A novel computer-based technique for the assessment of tremor in parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing 36(4):395–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowie CR, Harvey PD (2006) Administration and interpretation of the trail making test. Nat Protoc 1:2277–2281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham H, Penney D, Davis R, Tanner J, Nguyen P, Schwab N, Malaty I, Okun MS, Bowers D, Libon DJ, Price CC (2012) Clock drawing in pd: what makes the clock drawing test tick? J Int Neuropsychol Soc, p 222

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eoff BD, Hammond T (2009) Who dotted that ‘i’?: context free user differentiation through pressure and tilt pen data. In: Proceedings of graphics interface 2009, GI’09. Canadian information processing society, Toronto, Ont, Canada pp 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hodges JR (2007) Cognitive Assessment for Clinicians, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hoyert DL, Xu J et al (2012) Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 61(6):1–52

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim H, Cho YS, Do EYL (2010) Context-bounded refinement filter algorithm: improving recognizer accuracy of handwriting in clock drawing test

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim H, Cho YS, Do EYL (2011) Using pen-based computing in technology for health. Human-computer interaction, Users and applications, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6764. Springer, Berlin, pp 192–201

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lara-Garduno R, Melnyk N, Taele P, Hammond T (2015) Evaluating automated cognitive testing for stroke patient diagnosis and recovery. In: ACM Richard Tapia celebration of diversity in computing, ACM, Poster presentation

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lees-Haley PR, Smith HH, Williams CW, Dunn JT (1996) Forensic neuropsychological test usage: an empirical survey. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 11(1):45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lezak MD (1995) Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Kaber DB, Tupler L, Lee YS (2011) Haptic-based virtual environment design and modeling of motor skill assessment for brain injury patientsrehabilitation. Comput Aided Des Appl 8(2):149–162

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lu PH, Boone KB, Cozolino L, Mitchell C (2003) Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test and the meyers and meyers recognition trial in the detection of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol 17(3):426–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reitan RM (1992) Trail making test: manual for administration and scoring. Reitan neuropsychology laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosselli M, Ardila A (1991) Effects of age, education, and gender on the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure. Clin Neuropsychol 5(4):370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shorr JS, Delis DC, Massman PJ (1992) Memory for the Rey-Osterrieth figure: perceptual clustering, encoding, and storage. Neuropsychology 6(1):43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shulman KI, Feinstein A (2003) Quick cognitive screening for clinicians: mini-mental, Clock-drawing and other brief tests, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strauss E, Sherman EM, Spreen O (2006) A compendium of neuropsychological tests, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press Inc., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tombaugh TN (2004) Trail making test a and b: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19(2):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wahlin TBR, Bckman L, ke Wahlin A, Winblad B (1996) Trail making test performance in a community-based sample of healthy very old adults: effects of age on completion time, but not on accuracy. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 22(1): 87–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Texas A&M Health Science Center for the invaluable feedback and guidance in the development of this project. We also thank several team members of Texas A&M’s Sketch Recognition Lab, especially Folami Alamudun, Paul Taele, and all the members who continue to provide feedback and useful sketch data as they aid in completing user studies. Additionally, we would like to thank Nick Melnyk, Laramie Goode, Andy Hurley, Thomas Klingshirn, and Josh Rispoli for their significant contributions during the project’s inception in concept and implementation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raniero Lara-Garduno .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lara-Garduno, R., Leslie, N., Hammond, T. (2016). SmartStrokes: Digitizing Paper-Based Neuropsychological Tests. In: Hammond, T., Valentine, S., Adler, A. (eds) Revolutionizing Education with Digital Ink. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31193-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31193-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31191-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31193-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics